US6973410B2
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and system for evaluating the efficiency of an air conditioning apparatus
Assignee: Chillergy Systems LLC
•
Filing: 2001-12-27
•
Granted: 2005-12-06
•
Expires: 2021-12-27
Abstract
Abstract Air conditioning chiller operating efficiency is evaluated in response to chiller operating parameters input to a computing device which calculates separately the efficiencies of the condenser and evaporator components of the chiller. Additional efficiency calculations are performed to identify specific causes of inefficiency in the condenser and evaporator. The computing device also adjusts the efficiency calculations as appropriate to account for actual compressor current load conditions. The device determines whether chiller efficiency is being compromised by poor performance of one or more chiller components, calculates inefficiency values, estimates the cost of the inefficiency, identifies specific causes of the inefficiency, and suggests appropriate remedial actions to restore maximum efficiency of the chiller.
Inventors
- 👤 Lawrence J. Seigel
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 22:21
CPC Classifications
F; F24; F24F; F24F11/00; F24F11/30; F24F11/46; F24F11/47
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 49
Claim 1
Independent Claim
123 words
A method for evaluating an air conditioning chiller having a condenser, an evaporator, and a compressor, comprising the steps of: inputting condenser data and evaporator data into a computing device, which performs steps comprising: computing a condenser efficiency loss value based on a condenser relationship between condenser efficiency and the condenser data; comparing the condenser efficiency loss value to a condenser loss threshold value to assess chiller efficiency; computing an evaporator efficiency loss value based on an evaporator relationship between evaporator efficiency and the evaporator data; comparing the evaporator efficiency loss value to an evaporator efficiency loss threshold value to assess chiller efficiency; and calculating a chiller efficiency loss value by totaling the condenser efficiency loss value and the evaporator efficiency loss value.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
123 words
A method for evaluating an air conditioning chiller having a condenser, an evaporator, and a compressor, comprising the steps of: inputting condenser data and evaporator data into a computing device, which performs steps comprising: computing a condenser efficiency loss value based on a condenser relationship between condenser efficiency and the condenser data; comparing the condenser efficiency loss value to a condenser loss threshold value to assess chiller efficiency; computing an evaporator efficiency loss value based on an evaporator relationship between evaporator efficiency and the evaporator data; comparing the evaporator efficiency loss value to an evaporator efficiency loss threshold value to assess chiller efficiency; and calculating a chiller efficiency loss value by totaling the condenser efficiency loss value and the evaporator efficiency loss value.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 1 , in which the inputting step comprises: a person reading instruments measuring condenser parameters and evaporator parameters; and a person keying the condenser data based on the condenser parameters and evaporator data based on the evaporator parameters into the computing device.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method of claim 1 , in which the inputting step comprises: a person reading the condenser data and the evaporator data from a plurality of instruments collectively measuring at least one condenser parameter and at least one evaporator parameter; a person keying the condenser data and the evaporator data into a portable handheld device; and the computing device receiving the condenser data and the evaporator data via the portable handheld device.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 1 , in which the inputting step comprises: reading the condenser data and the evaporator data from one or more electronic sensors that collectively measure at least one condenser parameter and at least one evaporator parameter.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 1 , in which the inputting step comprises: enabling a portable handheld device to read the condenser data and the evaporator data from a plurality of electronic sensors that collectively measure at least one condenser parameter and at least one evaporator parameter; and receiving the condenser data and evaporator data via the portable handheld device.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of: A. enabling a user using a client computer to remotely via a computing network access a server computer associated with the computing device, and B. transmitting from the client computer to the server computer the condenser data and evaporator data.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 6 , in which the server computer performs steps comprising, identifying a condenser problem associated with the condenser efficiency loss value and an evaporator problem associated with the evaporator efficiency loss value.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 7 , further comprising the steps of: transmitting from the server computer to the client computer an indication of a condenser remedial action and an evaporator remedial action.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 8 , further comprising the step of enabling a provider of services associated with indication of a condenser remedial action and the evaporator remedial action to receive monetary compensation from a recipient of the services.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
86 words
The method of claim 8 , further comprising the steps of: C. enabling the user using the client computer to log on to the server computer; D. transmitting from the server computer to the client computer an indication of a plurality of chillers about which a user can select to receive information; E. enabling the user to select at least one of the plurality of chillers; and F. transmitting from the client computer to the server computer an indication of the selected at least one chiller.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 10 , in which the plurality of chillers includes a first chiller located at a different place from a second chiller.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 10 , in which the plurality of chillers includes a first chiller installed in the same building as a second chiller.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 6 in which the client computer is the computing device.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
98 words
The method of claim 1 in which: A. the condenser data is selected from the group consisting of: i. a condenser inlet temperature; ii. a condenser outlet temperature; iii. a condenser refrigerant pressure; iv. a condenser refrigerant temperature; v. a condenser inlet pressure; and vi. a condenser outlet pressure; and B. the condenser loss threshold value is selected from the group consisting of: i. an optimal condenser inlet temperature; ii. an optimal condenser approach; iii. an estimated condenser approach based on when the chiller was made; iv. an optimal condenser pressure; and v. an optimal condenser pressure drop.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
60 words
The method of claim 1 in which: A. the evaporator data is selected from the group consisting of: i. an evaporator refrigerant temperature; ii. an evaporator outlet temperature; iii. an evaporator refrigerant pressure; and B. the evaporator efficiency loss threshold value is selected from the group consisting of: i. an optimal evaporator approach; ii. an optimal chiller water outlet temperature.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of inputting compressor data in which the compressor data is selected from the group consisting of: A. an actual compressor current and B. a full load compressor current.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 1 , in which the computing device performs steps further comprising: A. identifying a condenser problem associated with the condenser efficiency loss value and an evaporator problem associated with the evaporator efficiency loss value.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 17 , in which the computing device performs steps further comprising: B. indicating a condenser remedial action and an evaporator remedial action.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
121 words
A computer-readable medium having a program for evaluating an air conditioning chiller having a condenser, an evaporator, and a compressor, comprising logic for: inputting condenser data and evaporator data into a computing device; computing a condenser efficiency loss value based on a condenser relationship between condenser efficiency and the condenser data; comparing the computed condenser efficiency loss value to a condenser loss threshold value to assess chiller efficiency; computing an evaporator efficiency loss value based on an evaporator relationship between evaporator efficiency and the evaporator data; comparing the evaporator efficiency loss value to an evaporator efficiency loss threshold value to assess chiller efficiency; calculating a chiller loss value by totaling the condenser efficiency loss value and the evaporator efficiency loss value.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
121 words
A computer-readable medium having a program for evaluating an air conditioning chiller having a condenser, an evaporator, and a compressor, comprising logic for: inputting condenser data and evaporator data into a computing device; computing a condenser efficiency loss value based on a condenser relationship between condenser efficiency and the condenser data; comparing the computed condenser efficiency loss value to a condenser loss threshold value to assess chiller efficiency; computing an evaporator efficiency loss value based on an evaporator relationship between evaporator efficiency and the evaporator data; comparing the evaporator efficiency loss value to an evaporator efficiency loss threshold value to assess chiller efficiency; calculating a chiller loss value by totaling the condenser efficiency loss value and the evaporator efficiency loss value.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
157 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 19 in which: A. the program further comprises logic for sensing a running current of the compressor; B. the condenser data includes: i. information sufficient to define a predetermined optimal condenser approach, ii. a condenser refrigerant temperature, and iii. a condenser outlet temperature; and C. the computing logic includes logic for computing: i. a fractional load current as the ratio of the running current to a full load current of the compressor motor; ii. a full load condenser approach as the ratio of the difference between condenser refrigerant temperature and condenser outlet temperature to the fractional load current; iii. a condenser approach difference as the difference between the full load condenser approach and the predetermined optimal condenser approach; and iv. a condenser approach loss component of the condenser efficiency loss value as the condenser approach difference multiplied by a condenser approach efficiency factor if the condenser approach difference is greater than zero.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
16 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 20 in which the condenser approach efficiency factor is approximately 2.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
100 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 21 in which: D. the information sufficient to define the optimal condenser approach is a year in which the chiller was manufactured, and E. the program further comprises logic for setting the optimal condenser approach as follows: i. the predetermined optimal condenser approach is set to approximately one if the chiller was made during 1990 or later, ii. the predetermined optimal condenser approach is set to approximately two if the chiller was made during the 1980s; and iii. the predetermined optimal condenser approach is set to approximately five if the chiller was made before 1980.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
24 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 21 in which the information sufficient to define the predetermined optimal condenser approach is a design condenser approach value.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
34 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 20 in which the program further comprises logic for: D. indicating that the condenser requires service and E. suggesting an action that may increase the efficiency of the condenser.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
158 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 19 in which: A. the program further comprises logic for sensing a running current of the compressor; B. the evaporator data includes: i. information sufficient to define a predetermined optimal evaporator approach, ii. an evaporator refrigerant temperature, and iii. an evaporator outlet temperature; and C. the computing logic includes logic for computing: i. a fractional load current as the ratio of the running current to a full load current of the compressor motor; ii. a full load evaporator approach as the ratio of the difference between the evaporator outlet temperature and the evaporator refrigerant temperature to the fractional load current; iii. an evaporator approach difference as the difference between the full load evaporator approach and the predetermined optimal evaporator approach; and iv. an evaporator approach component of the evaporator efficiency loss value as the evaporator approach difference multiplied by an evaporator approach efficiency factor if the evaporator approach difference is greater than zero.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
16 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 25 in which the evaporator approach efficiency factor is approximately 2.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
102 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 26 in which: D. the information sufficient to define the predetermined optimal evaporator approach is a year in which the chiller was manufactured, and E. the program further comprises logic for setting the predetermined optimal evaporator approach as follows: i. the predetermined optimal evaporator approach is set to approximately three if the chiller was made during 1990 or later; ii. the predetermined optimal evaporator approach is set to approximately four if the chiller was made during the 1980s; and iii. the predetermined optimal evaporator approach is set to approximately six if the chiller was made before 1980.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
24 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 26 in which the information sufficient to define the predetermined optimal evaporator approach is a design evaporator approach value.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
65 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 19 in which: A. the condenser data includes: i. information sufficient to define a predetermined optimal condenser pressure, and ii. a condenser refrigerant pressure; B. the computing logic includes logic for computing a noncondensables component of the condenser efficiency loss value as a noncondensable multiplier times the difference between the condenser refrigerant pressure and the predetermined optimal condenser refrigerant pressure.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
37 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 19 in which the condenser data includes condenser inlet temperature and a condenser inlet loss component of the condenser efficiency loss value is computed as the condenser inlet temperature times approximately 2.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
125 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 19 in which: A. the condenser data includes: i. a condenser inlet temperature, ii. a condenser inlet pressure, iii. a condenser outlet temperature, iv. a condenser outlet pressure, v. an optimal condenser water pressure drop; and B. the program includes logic for computing: i. an actual condenser water pressure drop as the difference between the condenser inlet pressure and the condenser outlet pressure; ii. delta variance as the square root of the ratio of actual condenser water pressure drop to optimal condenser water pressure drop; iii. a final variance as (1- delta variance) multiplied by (condenser outlet temperature−condenser inlet temperature); and iv. a condenser flow loss component of the condenser efficiency loss value as the final variance times approximately 2.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
59 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 19 in which: A. the condenser data includes an evaporator outlet temperature and an optimal evaporator outlet temperature; and B. the program includes logic for computing a set point loss component of the evaporator efficiency loss value as approximately two times the difference between the evaporator outlet temperature and the optimal evaporator outlet temperature.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
41 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 19 , in which the inputting logic comprises reading the condenser data and the evaporator data from one or more electronic sensors that collectively measure at least one condenser parameter and at least one evaporator parameter.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
62 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 19 , in which the inputting logic comprises: A. enabling a portable handheld device to read the condenser data and the evaporator data from a plurality of electronic sensors that collectively measure at least one condenser parameter and at least one evaporator parameter, and B. receiving the condenser data and evaporator data via the portable handheld device.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
53 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 19 in which the program further comprises logic for: enabling a user using a client computer to remotely via a computing network access a server computer associated with the computing device, and C. transmitting from the client computer to the server computer the condenser data and evaporator data.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
37 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 35 , in which the program further comprises logic for identifying a condenser problem associated with the condenser efficiency loss value and an evaporator problem associated with the evaporator efficiency loss value.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
37 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 36 , in which the program further comprises logic for: C. transmitting from the server computer to the client computer an indication of a condenser remedial action and an evaporator remedial action.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
41 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 37 , in which the program further comprises logic for enabling a provider of services associated with indication of the condenser problem and the evaporator problem to receive monetary compensation from a recipient of the services.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
87 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 37 , in which the program further comprises logic for: D. enabling the user using the client computer to log on to the server computer, E. transmitting from the server computer to the client computer an indication of a plurality of chillers about which a user can select to receive information; F. enabling the user to select at least one of the plurality of chillers; and G. transmitting from the client computer to the server computer an indication of the selected chiller.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
26 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 39 , in which the plurality of chillers includes a first chiller located at a different place from a second chiller.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
26 words
The computer-readable medium of claim 39 , in which the plurality of chillers includes a first chiller installed in the same building as a second chiller.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
16 words
The computer readable medium of claim 35 in which the client computer is the computing device.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
17 words
The computer readable medium of claim 35 in which the portable handheld device is the computing device.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
39 words
The computer readable medium of claim 19 , in which the program further comprises logic for: A. identifying a condenser problem associated with the condenser efficiency loss value and an evaporator problem associated with the evaporator efficiency loss values.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
27 words
The computer readable medium of claim 44 , in which the program further comprises logic for: B. indicating a condenser remedial action and an evaporator remedial action.
Claim 48
Independent Claim
160 words
A method of using a computing device for evaluating the efficiency of a chiller having a condenser and a compressor motor, comprising the steps of: A. inputting into the computing device: i. information sufficient to define a predetermnined optimal condenser approach, ii. condenser refrigerant temperature, and iii. condenser outlet temperature; B. sensing a running current of the compressor motor; C. computing: i. a fractional load current as the ratio of the running current of the compressor motor to a full load current of the compressor motor; ii. a full load condenser approach as the ratio of the difference between condenser refrigerant temperature and condenser outlet temperature and the fractional load current; iii. a condenser approach difference as the difference between the full load condenser approach and the predetermined optimal condenser approach; and D. computing a condenser approach efficiency loss as the condenser approach difference multiplied by a condenser approach efficiency factor if the condenser approach difference is greater than zero.
Claim 49
Independent Claim
160 words
A method of using a computing device for evaluating the efficiency of a chiller having a condenser and a compressor motor, comprising the steps of: A. inputting into the computing device: i. information sufficient to define a predetermnined optimal condenser approach, ii. condenser refrigerant temperature, and iii. condenser outlet temperature; B. sensing a running current of the compressor motor; C. computing: i. a fractional load current as the ratio of the running current of the compressor motor to a full load current of the compressor motor; ii. a full load condenser approach as the ratio of the difference between condenser refrigerant temperature and condenser outlet temperature and the fractional load current; iii. a condenser approach difference as the difference between the full load condenser approach and the predetermined optimal condenser approach; and D. computing a condenser approach efficiency loss as the condenser approach difference multiplied by a condenser approach efficiency factor if the condenser approach difference is greater than zero.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4270361A
Cited
US4334275A
Cited
US4510576A
Cited
US4483152A
Cited
US5515267A
Cited
US4768346A
Cited
US5103391A
Cited
US5289362A
Cited
US5083438A
Cited
US5152152A
Cited
US5481481A
Cited
US5369597A
Cited
US5555509A
Cited
US5651264A
Cited
US5623426A
Cited
US5684463A
Cited
US5555195A
Cited
US5539385A
Cited
US5539382A
Cited
US5927398A
Cited
US5924486A
Cited
US6088688A
Cited
US5900801A
Cited
US5939974A
Cited
US6487457B1
Cited
US6389331B1
Cited
US6179214B1
Cited
US6272868B1
Cited
US6438981B1
Cited
US20020055358A1
Cited
US6430944B1
Cited
US6532754B2
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2008-12-05 | 2009-06-06 | 2009-12-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2012-12-05 | 2013-06-06 | 2013-12-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2016-12-05 | 2017-06-06 | 2017-12-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |