Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
81 words
A method of determining whether a document is identified by a seal, the seal having a characteristic color, the method comprising: a) generating an image of the document; b) searching the image for a suspicious block having at least one pixel of the characteristic color; and c) identifying each block contiguous to any suspicious block as suspicious, if the contiguous block also has at least one pixel of the characteristic color, wherein the contiguous suspicious blocks collectively form a suspicious region.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
81 words
A method of determining whether a document is identified by a seal, the seal having a characteristic color, the method comprising: a) generating an image of the document; b) searching the image for a suspicious block having at least one pixel of the characteristic color; and c) identifying each block contiguous to any suspicious block as suspicious, if the contiguous block also has at least one pixel of the characteristic color, wherein the contiguous suspicious blocks collectively form a suspicious region.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising d) classifying the document as non-suspicious if a size of the suspicious region does not substantially match a size of the seal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising d) classifying the document as non-suspicious if a shape of the suspicious region does not substantially match a shape of the seal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising d) classifying the document as non-suspicious if a density of pixels having the characteristic color does not substantially match a corresponding pixel density of the seal.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising d) classifying the document as non-suspicious if a radial density of pixels having the characteristic color does not substantially match a radial density profile of the seal.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising d) classifying the document as suspicious if the suspicious region has substantially a same size, shape, density of pixels having the characteristic color, and radial density of pixels having the characteristic color.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 6 further comprising d) degrading the image before reproduction, if the document has been classified as suspicious.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 7 wherein degrading the image includes substituting another color for any pixels having the characteristic color within the suspicious region.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
62 words
A method of deterring counterfeit reproductions of secure documents having a seal of a pre-determined color, comprising the steps of: a) partitioning an image of a document into a plurality of contiguous blocks; b) classifying any block having at least one pixel of the pre-determined color as a suspicious block; and c) classifying the document as non-suspicious, if no suspicious block exists.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
62 words
A method of deterring counterfeit reproductions of secure documents having a seal of a pre-determined color, comprising the steps of: a) partitioning an image of a document into a plurality of contiguous blocks; b) classifying any block having at least one pixel of the pre-determined color as a suspicious block; and c) classifying the document as non-suspicious, if no suspicious block exists.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 9 further comprising the step of: d) identifying a group of contiguous blocks with the suspicious block as a suspicious region, if each block in the group has at least one pixel of the pre-determined color associated with the seal.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of: e) classifying the document as non-suspicious, if no suspicious region exists.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 10 wherein step d) further comprises the step of performing a block based morphologic dilation of any suspicious block to identify the suspicious region of contiguous blocks.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of: e) classifying the document as non-suspicious if a size of the suspicious region does not substantially match a size of the seal.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of: e) classifying the document as non-suspicious if a shape of the suspicious region does not substantially match a shape of the seal.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of: e) classifying the document as non-suspicious if a density of pixels having the pre-determined color does not substantially match a corresponding pixel density of the seal.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of: e) classifying the document as non-suspicious if a radial density of pixels having the pre-determined color does not substantially match a radial density profile of the seal.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of: e) classifying the document as suspicious if the suspicious region has substantially a same size, shape, density of pixels having the pre-determined color, and radial density of pixels having the pre-determined color as the seal.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 17 further comprising the step of: f) degrading the image before reproduction, if the document is suspicious.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 18 wherein step f) further comprises the step of substituting another color for any pixels having the pre-determined color within the suspicious region.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 10 further comprising the step of: e) performing the reproduction only if the document is classified as non-suspicious.