← Back to Patent Explorer
US6463457B1 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

System and method for the establishment and the utilization of networked idle computational processing power

Assignee: Parabon Computation Inc
•
Filing: 2000-08-28
•
Granted: 2002-10-08
•
Expires: 2020-08-28
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A distributed computing platform using the idle computational processing power of a plurality of provider computers is disclosed. At least one networked server collects tasks from client computers, schedules and distributes the tasks to networked provider computers, and collects and returns results to client computers. A client API forms tasks and collects results. A compute engine operates on the provider computers to communicate with the server and execute tasks using idle computational power.

Inventors

  • 👤 Steven L. Armentrout
  • 👤 James O'Connor
  • 👤 James Gannon
  • 👤 Brian Sletten
  • 👤 Sean Cier
  • 👤 Sarah Carlson
  • 👤 Antony Davies
  • 👤 Jonathan Davis
  • 👤 Greg DuPertuis
  • 👤 Scott McLoughlin

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-31 17:45
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F9/00; G06F9/06; G06F9/46; G06F9/50; G06F9/5061; G06F9/5072

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 52
Claim 1
Independent Claim 156 words
A system for using computer excess computational power comprising: at least one client computer adapted to create programs for execution; a network connected to the client computer; a central task server (CTS) connected to the network, adapted to receive the programs from the client; a plurality of provider computers for providing excess computational power connected to the CTS via network and adapted to receive the programs from the CTS, the CTS thereby providing computational power upon demand to the at least one client computer; and instructions for paying the owners of the provider computers a fixed amount per unit work for providing excess computational power according to a formula: T   ln   ( 1 - π ) ln   ( 1 - r )   per   GHz  -  hour ,  where T is a rate, π is an average availability, and r is a target reliability.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 156 words
A system for using computer excess computational power comprising: at least one client computer adapted to create programs for execution; a network connected to the client computer; a central task server (CTS) connected to the network, adapted to receive the programs from the client; a plurality of provider computers for providing excess computational power connected to the CTS via network and adapted to receive the programs from the CTS, the CTS thereby providing computational power upon demand to the at least one client computer; and instructions for paying the owners of the provider computers a fixed amount per unit work for providing excess computational power according to a formula: T   ln   ( 1 - π ) ln   ( 1 - r )   per   GHz  -  hour ,  where T is a rate, π is an average availability, and r is a target reliability.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 52 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 1 wherein the at least one client computer further comprises: a client application programming interface (API) with instructions for allowing the client computer to specify a compute capacity needed in the form of a virtual cluster in which programs are to be run.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 37 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 2 further comprising client API instructions for collecting parameters to be specified for compute capacity comprising at least computer power, disk space required, and reliability of computer power.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 68 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 2 wherein the at least one client computer further comprises a run time interface, the run time interface further comprising a set of function calls used by the client computer for getting parameters from the run time environment, for getting data elements, for querying the CTS for task status, and for performing checkpointing at various places in the program.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 21 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 4 wherein the run time interface further comprises instructions for creating jobs.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 23 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 5 wherein the run time interface further comprises instructions for creating tasks within jobs.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 25 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 5 wherein the run time interface further comprises instructions for querying against a status of jobs.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 43 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 5 wherein the run time interface further comprises instructions for attaching the client computer of a job in progress and for checking on the status of a job while the job is in progress.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 33 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 1 wherein the CTS further comprises instructions for charging the at least one client for computational power used during the execution of the programs.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 23 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 9 wherein the charging of the client is made when the task is launched.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 31 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 10 wherein a task is launched when it is scheduled by the CTS to be run by at least one provider computer.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 27 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 1 wherein the CTS further comprises instructions for monitoring a virtual node specified by the client for failure.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 32 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 9 further comprising instructions for charging clients based upon a sum of the computational power of the provider computers running the client tasks.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 30 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 9 wherein the CTS further comprises instructions for making payments to providers based upon available computational power of the provider's computer.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 26 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 14 wherein the available computational power is a function of CPU availability, CPU speed and bandwidth availability.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 23 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 15 wherein CPU speed is measured by running benchmark tests of the CPU periodically.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 34 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 1 wherein each of the plurality of provider computer further comprises a general purpose compute engine (CE) for executing programs sent from the central server.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 32 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 17 wherein the CE further comprises instructions for allowing an owner of the provider computer to set availability parameters of the provider computer.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 47 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 18 wherein the availability parameters comprise amount of RAM available for the programs, amount of disk space available for the programs and times during the day, if any, that the provider computer is available to execute the programs.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 30 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 18 wherein the CE further comprises instructions for opening a widow on the provider computer when the programs are being run.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 25 words
The system~for using excess computational power of claim 18 wherein the CE further comprises instructions for displaying content from the central server in the window.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 31 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 18 wherein the CE further comprises instructions for executing the programs only when excess computational power is detected on the provider computer.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 56 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 9 further comprising instructions for determining an amount charged to the client I based on a formula: Price per hour for computation=4.5+0.296P 1.155, where P is a sum of all power in active nodes being used by the CTS to fulfill computational requirements specified by the client.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 139 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 23 wherein the client is also charged for data transfer during the course of executing the particular tasks of the client based upon the following formula: Total Cost of  Data Transfer = g  ( d i + d o )   ( ln   ( 1 - r ) ln   ( 1 - π ) + 1 ) , where d i in the quantity (in GB) of data transferred from the client to the server, d o is the quantity of data transferred from the server to the client, where g is the transfer cost per communication path among the client computer, the provider computer and the CTS per GB, r is a requested node reliability, and 7 is an average provider computer reliability.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 106 words
The system for using excess computational power of claim 24 wherein the client is also charged an hourly premium for requesting reliability greater than a set baseline reliability given by the formula: Price per hour for premium reliability = k   CN   ( ln   ( 1 - r ) ln   ( 1 - R ) - 1 ) where k is a baseline price per MHz-hour, C is the CPU speed requested of a virtual node requested by the client, N is the number of virtual nodes running, r is the requested reliability, and R is the baseline reliability.
Claim 27
Independent Claim 157 words
A method for using computer excess computational power comprising: adapting at least one client computer to create programs for execution; connecting the client computer to a network; connecting a central task server (CTS) to the network, wherein said CTS is adapted to receive the programs from the client; connecting a plurality of provider computers for providing excess computational power to the network and adapting said provider computers to receive the programs from the central server, the plurality of provider computers providing computational power upon demand; and further comprising paying the owners of the provider computers a fixed amount per unit work for providing excess computational power according to a formula: T   ln   ( 1 - π ) ln   ( 1 - r )   per   GHz  -  hour ,  where T is a rate, Tc is an average availability, and r is a target reliability.
Claim 28
Independent Claim 157 words
A method for using computer excess computational power comprising: adapting at least one client computer to create programs for execution; connecting the client computer to a network; connecting a central task server (CTS) to the network, wherein said CTS is adapted to receive the programs from the client; connecting a plurality of provider computers for providing excess computational power to the network and adapting said provider computers to receive the programs from the central server, the plurality of provider computers providing computational power upon demand; and further comprising paying the owners of the provider computers a fixed amount per unit work for providing excess computational power according to a formula: T   ln   ( 1 - π ) ln   ( 1 - r )   per   GHz  -  hour ,  where T is a rate, Tc is an average availability, and r is a target reliability.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 26 further comprising supplying the at least one client computer with a client application programming interface (API) for allowing the client computer to specify parameters under which the programs are to be run.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 27 , wherein the parameters to be specified are at least computer power, disk space required, and reliability of the computer power.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 69 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 27 , further comprising providing the at least one client computer with a run time interface, the run time interface including a set of function calls used by the client computer for getting parameters from the run time environment, for getting data elements, for querying the CTS for task status, and for performing checkpointing at various places in the program.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 29 , further comprising providing the run time interface with instructions for creating jobs.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 30 , further comprising providing the run time interface with instructions for creating tasks within jobs.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 30 , further comprising providing the run time interface with instructions for querying against a status of jobs.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim 45 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 30 , further comprising providing the run time interface with instructions for attaching the client computer of a job in progress and for checking on the status of a job while the job is in progress.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 26 , further comprising providing the CTS with instructions for charging the at least one client for excess computational power used during the execution of the programs.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 34 wherein the charging of the client is made when the task is launched.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 35 including launching a task when it is scheduled by the CTS to be run by at least one provider computer.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 26 , further comprising providing the CTS with instructions for monitoring a virtual node specified by the client for failure.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 34 wherein charging of clients is based upon a sum of the computational power of the provider computers running the client tasks.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 34 , further comprising providing the CTS with instructions for making payments to providers based upon available computational power of the provider's computer.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 39 wherein the available computational power is determined as a function of CPU availability, CPU speed and bandwidth availability.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 40 wherein CPU speed is measured by running benchmark tests of the CPU periodically.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 26 , further comprising providing each of the plurality of provider computer with a general purpose compute engine (CE) for executing programs sent from the central server.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 42 , further comprising providing the CE with instructions for allowing an owner of the provider computer to set availability parameters of the provider computer.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 43 wherein the availability parameters comprise amount of RAM available for the programs, amount of disk space available for the programs and times during the day, if any, that the provider computer is available to execute the programs.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 43 , further comprising providing the CE with instructions for opening a widow on the provider computer when the programs are being run.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 43 , further comprising providing the CE with instructions for displaying content from the central server in the window.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim 33 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 43 , further comprising providing the CE with instructions for executing the programs only when excess computational power is detected on the provider computer.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim 40 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 26 wherein an amount charged to the client I is computed based on a formula: Price per hour for computation=4.5+0.296P 1.155, where P is computational power of the computer in Mhz.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim 137 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 48 , further comprising charging the client for data transfer during the course of executing the particular tasks of the client based upon the following formula: Total Cost of  Data Transfer = g  ( d i + d o )   ( ln   ( 1 - r ) ln   ( 1 - π ) + 1 ) , where di in the quantity (in GB) of data transferred from the client to the server, do is the quantity of data transferred from the server to the client, where g is the transfer cost per communication path among the client computer, the provider computer and the CTS per GB, r is a requested node reliability, and r is an average provider computer reliability.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim 107 words
The method for using excess computational power of claim 49 , further comprising charging the client an hourly premium for requesting reliability greater an a set baseline reliability given by the formula: Price per hour for premium reliability = k   CN   ( ln   ( 1 - r ) ln   ( 1 - R ) - 1 ) where k is a baseline price per MHz-hour, C is the CPU speed requested of a virtual node requested by the client, N is the number of virtual nodes running, r is the requested reliability, and R is the baseline reliability. jobs.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US6192388B1 Cited
US6098091A Cited
US6112243A Cited
US6249836B1 Cited
US6009452A Cited
US6112225A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2005-10-07 2006-04-08 2006-10-08 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2009-10-07 2010-04-08 2010-10-08 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2013-10-07 2014-04-08 2014-10-08 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag