US6364447B1
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Correction system for droplet placement errors in the scan axis in inkjet printers
Assignee: HP Inc
•
Filing: 2000-02-18
•
Granted: 2002-04-02
•
Expires: 2020-02-18
Abstract
Abstract A method and apparatus for correcting for drop placement errors due to relative rotation between an inkjet printhead mounted in a printer carriage and the print media to be printed on comprises first determining the relative contribution to the drop placement error due to rotation of the printhead about the scan axis (Y axis error), then, with respect to any determined Y axis error, applying the same magnitude and sense of correction for drop placement errors while printing in both a first scanning direction of the carriage and while printing in a second scanning direction of the carriage. Errors due to rotation about the Z axis are also corrected for. Preferably the errors are determined by printing and scanning a test pattern.
Inventors
- 👤 Miguel Boleda
- 👤 Stefano Schiaffino
- 👤 Albert Serra
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 15:12
CPC Classifications
B; B41; B41J; B41J19/00; B41J19/14; B41J19/142; B41J19/145
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
120 words
A method, applicable to an inkjet printer having a scanning carriage, capable of bidirectional scanning along a scan axis, in which at least one printhead is mounted, for correcting for drop placement errors due to relative rotation between the printhead and the print media to be printed on, the method comprising the steps of: first determining the relative contribution to the drop placement error due to rotation of the printhead about the scan axis (Y axis error), then, with respect to any determined Y axis error, applying the same magnitude and sense of correction for drop placement errors while printing in both a first scanning direction of the carriage and while printing in a second scanning direction of the carriage.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
120 words
A method, applicable to an inkjet printer having a scanning carriage, capable of bidirectional scanning along a scan axis, in which at least one printhead is mounted, for correcting for drop placement errors due to relative rotation between the printhead and the print media to be printed on, the method comprising the steps of: first determining the relative contribution to the drop placement error due to rotation of the printhead about the scan axis (Y axis error), then, with respect to any determined Y axis error, applying the same magnitude and sense of correction for drop placement errors while printing in both a first scanning direction of the carriage and while printing in a second scanning direction of the carriage.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
179 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the determining step comprises determining both the Y axis error and the relative contribution to the drop placement error due to rotation of the printhead about the normal to the plane of the print media (Z axis error), then, with respect to any determined Y axis error, applying the same magnitude and sense of correction for drop placement errors while printing in both the first scanning direction of the carriage and while printing in the second scanning direction of the carriage, and with respect to any determined Z axis error, applying the same magnitude of correction while printing in both the first scanning direction of the carriage and while printing in the second scanning direction of the carriage, but reversing the sense of the correction so that a timing correction advance applied in the first direction becomes a timing correction delay when applied in the second direction and so that a timing correction delay applied in the first direction becomes a timing correction advance when applied in the second direction.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
99 words
A method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein in said determining step a composite drop placement error which is due to both Y axis error and Z axis error combined is determined and a drop placement error due to Y axis error alone is determined, and wherein in said applying step a first correction corresponding to the sum of the Y axis error and Z axis error is applied in the first scanning direction and a second correction corresponding to the difference between the Y axis error and Z axis error is applied in the second scanning direction.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein said first correction is calculated by measuring the sum of the drop placement errors due to Y axis errors and Z axis errors and the second correction is calculated by subtracting twice the measured value of the Y axis error from the first correction.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
44 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the determining step comprises printing by the printhead a test pattern on print media in which either Y errors or both Y and Z errors manifest themselves and measuring said test pattern to determine said errors.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method as claim 5 , wherein said test pattern is measured by a sensor mounted on the carriage of the printer.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as claimed in claim 5 , in which the test pattern consists of a set of a plurality of printed blocks printed by at least two groups of nozzles of the printhead wherein said at least two groups of nozzles are separated from one another along the height of the printhead.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method according to claim 7 , wherein a first group of said nozzles is located towards a first end of the printhead and a second group of said nozzles is located at towards a second end of the printhead.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein each of the said groups of nozzles comprise one nozzle.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein said test pattern is printed during two passes of the carriage over the print media and wherein the media is not advanced between the two passes of the carriage.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
82 words
A method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein a first distance between adjacent blocks printed by the same group of nozzles during a pass in a first scanning direction of the carriage is measured for each of the groups of nozzles and the separation of an intervening block printed by the same group of nozzles during a pass in a second scanning direction of the carriage to the midpoint of said first distance is determined and utilised in determining Y errors.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method as claimed in claim 11 , wherein a second distance between blocks printed by different groups of nozzles during two passes of the carriage in the same scanning direction is measured and utilised in determining Z errors.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein measurements made from said test pattern are utilised to correct for unidirectional and bidirectional printing errors by applying relative delays or advances to the firing time of nozzles of the printhead.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
61 words
A method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein a correction parameter is applied to each nozzle of the printhead to correct for said determined errors and wherein correction parameters for nozzles which have not been utilised to print the test pattern are obtained by interpolation of the correction parameters calculated for the groups of nozzles which printed the test pattern.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
18 words
A method according to claim 1 in which the correction parameters are calculated for different carriage scanning speeds.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
29 words
A printhead alignment procedure included in an inkjet printer, using the correction method subject of claim 1 as the sole method for correcting systematic errors in the scan axis.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
29 words
A printhead alignment procedure included in an inkjet printer, using the correction method subject of claim 1 together with other methods for correcting systematic errors in the scan axis.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
62 words
Apparatus for correcting for drop placement errors in an inkjet printer due to relative rotations between the printhead and the print media to be printed on comprising: a processor to store and apply correction parameters for the firing time of nozzles of said printhead wherein said stored correction parameters have been determined in accordance with the method claimed in claim 1 .
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
55 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 18 , further comprising a test pattern generator for printing a test pattern on print media and a sensor module for obtaining measurements from said printed test pattern and wherein the processor is capable of generating said correction parameters in dependence on the measurements made from said printed test pattern.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
27 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 18 , wherein the processor stores correction parameters for only one printhead of a plurality mounted within the carriage of the printer.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2005-04-01 | 2005-10-01 | 2006-04-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2009-04-01 | 2009-10-01 | 2010-04-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2013-04-01 | 2013-10-01 | 2014-04-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |