US6356650B1
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for computer-adaptation of a reference data set on the basis of at least one input data set
Assignee: Infineon Technologies AG
•
Filing: 1998-04-14
•
Granted: 2002-03-12
•
Expires: 2018-04-14
Abstract
Abstract What the method assures is that natural changes in the signature of a person are not reflected in the form of increasing rejections within the framework of an authentification of this person on the basis of the person's signature. "Natural" variation in the signature of the person is adapted to a reference signature, whereby an appropriate "distance" from a possible forged signature is adhered to so that adaptation is not undertaken in the direction of a potential forger. To that end, the signature is evaluated dependent on its distance from the reference signature and this evaluation criterion is divided into ranges that reflect the quality of the signature. Proceeding from the quality, an evaluation is possible as to whether or not an adaptation is implemented.
Inventors
- 👤 Brigitte Wirtz
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 23:00
CPC Classifications
G; G07; G07C; G07C9/00; G07C9/30; G07C9/32; G07C9/35; G06; G06F; G06F18/00; G06F18/20; G06F18/28; G06V; G06V40/00; G06V40/30
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
153 words
A method for computer-adaptation of a reference data set based on at least one input data set, comprising the steps of: a) determining an evaluation criterion in view of a coincidence with the at least one reference data set for the input data set; b) entering the input data set into a buffer memory and determining a new reference data set when the evaluation criterion lies within a predetermined, first range; c) determining a next reference data set from the data sets from the buffer memory when the evaluation criterion lies within a predetermined, second range, and when a next reference data set is better than a previous reference data set, using the next reference data set and discarding the old reference data set, otherwise, when the next reference data set is poorer than the previous reference data set, discarding the next reference data set; d) otherwise, not modifying the reference data set.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
153 words
A method for computer-adaptation of a reference data set based on at least one input data set, comprising the steps of: a) determining an evaluation criterion in view of a coincidence with the at least one reference data set for the input data set; b) entering the input data set into a buffer memory and determining a new reference data set when the evaluation criterion lies within a predetermined, first range; c) determining a next reference data set from the data sets from the buffer memory when the evaluation criterion lies within a predetermined, second range, and when a next reference data set is better than a previous reference data set, using the next reference data set and discarding the old reference data set, otherwise, when the next reference data set is poorer than the previous reference data set, discarding the next reference data set; d) otherwise, not modifying the reference data set.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the reference data set is determined in that prescribable characteristic quantities of a prescribable plurality of data sets are averaged.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein a data set is selected as reference data set from a prescribable plurality of data sets whose characteristic quantities best describe the selected data sets.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the buffer memory is a ring buffer having a prescribable plurality of data sets.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the input data set is an original data set when the evaluation criterion lies within the first range or second range or the input data set is a forgery when the evaluation criterion lies outside the first range or second range.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein original data sets are distributed according to a probability distribution.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method according to claim 6 , wherein the probability distribution is a normal distribution with an anticipation value and a standard deviation.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method according to claim 7 , wherein the reference data set corresponds to the anticipation value of the original data sets.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
109 words
The method according to claim 7 , wherein the first range is determined by an interval BEWε(0; μ+α 1 σ), where BEW denotes the evaluation criterion, μ denotes the anticipation value, σ denotes the standard deviation, α 1 denotes a prescribable parameter with which an upper threshold of the first range is defined, and wherein the second range is determined by an interval BEW ε (μ+α 1 ·σ; μ+α 2 ·σ), where α 2 references a prescribable parameter with which an upper threshold of the second range is defined, and wherein a third range is defined by an interval BEWε(μ+α 2 ·σ; ∞), whereby the third range covers forgeries.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method according to claim 9 , wherein the input data set that lies in a fourth range between the second range and the third range with prescribable thresholds is recognized as original data set but the reference data set is not modified.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method according to claim 1 , wherein the data sets are signatures that are electronically registered and stored and that cover a prescribable set of characteristic quantities.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
DE2945377A1
Cited
GB2104698A
Cited
US4724542A
Cited
US5052043A
Cited
US5479531A
Cited
US5559895A
Cited
US5680470A
Cited
US5802200A
Cited
US5930380A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2005-03-11 | 2005-09-10 | 2006-03-12 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2009-03-11 | 2009-09-10 | 2010-03-12 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2013-03-11 | 2013-09-10 | 2014-03-12 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |