Sample refinement method of multiple mode probability density estimation
Abstract
Abstract The invention recognizes that a probability density function for fitting a model to a complex set of data often has multiple modes, each mode representing a reasonably probable state of the model when compared with the data. Particularly, sequential data such as are collected from detection of moving objects in three dimensional space are placed into data frames. Also, a single frame of data may require analysis by a sequence of analysis operations. Computation of the probability density function of the model state involves two main stages: (1) state prediction, in which the prior probability distribution is generated from information known prior to the availability of the data, and (2) state update, in which the posterior probability distribution is formed by updating the prior distribution with information obtained from observing the data. In particular this information obtained purely from data observations can also be expressed as a probability density function, known as the likelihood function. The likelihood function is a multimodal (multiple peaks) function when a single data frame leads to multiple distinct measurements from which the correct measurement associated with the model cannot be distinguished. The invention analyzes a multimodal likelihood function by numerically searching the likelihood function for peaks. The numerical search proceeds by randomly sampling from the prior distribution to select a number of seed points in state-space, and then numerically finding the maxima of the likelihood function starting from each seed point. Furthermore, kernel functions are fitted to these peaks to represent the likelihood function as an analytic function. The resulting posterior distribution is also multimodal and represented using a set of kernel functions. It is computed by combining the prior distribution and the likelihood function using Bayes Rule. The peaks in the posterior distribution are also referred to as ‘hypotheses’, as they are hypotheses for the states of the model which best explain both the data and the prior knowledge.
Inventors
- 👤 Tat-Jen Cham
- 👤 James Matthew Rehg
Bibliographic Details
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2005-03-04 | 2005-09-03 | 2006-03-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2009-03-04 | 2009-09-03 | 2010-03-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2013-03-04 | 2013-09-03 | 2014-03-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |