← Back to Patent Explorer
US6324517B1 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Meeting site selection based on all-inclusive meeting cost

Assignee: GetThere Inc
•
Filing: 1999-02-02
•
Granted: 2001-11-27
•
Expires: 2019-02-02
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Meeting or conference facilities are evaluated based on an all-inclusive meeting cost. The all-inclusive meeting cost is used to rank the facilities based on the lowest all-inclusive meeting cost or on highest quality below a maximum cost. Meeting planners can then compare total meeting cost at facilities with different characteristics, and find the facilities that offer the most value. An application server is used to calculate all-inclusive meeting cost from a comprehensive database of cost factors. The list of generated meeting facilities and their costs can be generated quickly for a large number of potential meeting facilities.

Inventors

  • 👤 Glenn Bingham
  • 👤 Craig Martin

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-06 10:08
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q10/00; G06Q10/04; G06Q10/02; G06Q10/028; G06Q10/0287; G06Q10/06; G06Q10/063; G06Q10/0631; G06Q10/06314; G06Q10/0637; G06Q10/06375; G06Q30/00; G06Q30/02; G06Q30/0283; G06Q30/06

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 35
Claim 1
Independent Claim 133 words
A computer implemented method of selecting a meeting facility for hosting a meeting, the method comprising: receiving a range of dates, a list of attendees of the meeting, and an originating location for each of the attendees; calculating an all-inclusive cost for hosting the meeting at each of a plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the specified range of dates and the specified list of attendees; ranking the plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the calculated all-inclusive costs; receiving a list of preferences and geographic locations corresponding to the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities; and removing facilities from the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities which do not contain the preferences and which do not correspond to the geographic locations specified in the received list of preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 133 words
A computer implemented method of selecting a meeting facility for hosting a meeting, the method comprising: receiving a range of dates, a list of attendees of the meeting, and an originating location for each of the attendees; calculating an all-inclusive cost for hosting the meeting at each of a plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the specified range of dates and the specified list of attendees; ranking the plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the calculated all-inclusive costs; receiving a list of preferences and geographic locations corresponding to the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities; and removing facilities from the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities which do not contain the preferences and which do not correspond to the geographic locations specified in the received list of preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating further includes estimating a cost for each said attendee to travel to each of the plurality of facilities.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating further includes estimating a meal cost for each attendee at each of the plurality of facilities.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating further includes estimating a lodging cost for each attendee at each of the plurality of facilities.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating further includes estimating a conference room cost for the meeting.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating the all-inclusive cost for hosting the meeting includes calculating optimized costs and summing the calculated optimized costs.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 6 , wherein calculating optimized costs includes calculating a minimum cost for ground transportation to and from airports.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 51 words
The method of claim 6 , wherein calculating optimized costs includes finding a lowest airfare among airport pairs corresponding to a first airport from a set of airports near an origin location of the attendees and a second airport from a set of airports near a destination location of the attendees.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 6 , wherein calculating optimized costs includes calculating a minimum costs for a plurality of ranges of dates.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 155 words
A computer system comprising: a processor; a network connection; and a memory, the memory including instructions that when executed by the processor perform selection if a meeting facility for hosting a meeting by (1) receiving a range of dates, a list of attendees of the meeting, and an originating location for each of the attendees, (2) calculating an all-inclusive cost for hosting the meeting at each of a plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the specified range of dates and the specified list of attendees, (3) ranking the plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the calculated all-inclusive costs, (4) receiving a list of preferences and geographic locations corresponding to the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities, and (5) removing facilities from the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities which do not contain the preferences and which do not correspond to the geographic locations specified in the received list of preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 155 words
A computer system comprising: a processor; a network connection; and a memory, the memory including instructions that when executed by the processor perform selection if a meeting facility for hosting a meeting by (1) receiving a range of dates, a list of attendees of the meeting, and an originating location for each of the attendees, (2) calculating an all-inclusive cost for hosting the meeting at each of a plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the specified range of dates and the specified list of attendees, (3) ranking the plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the calculated all-inclusive costs, (4) receiving a list of preferences and geographic locations corresponding to the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities, and (5) removing facilities from the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities which do not contain the preferences and which do not correspond to the geographic locations specified in the received list of preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 34 words
The system of claim 10 , wherein the memory further includes instructions for ranking the plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the calculated all-inclusive costs and selecting the sub-set based on the ranking.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 30 words
The system of claim 10 , wherein the memory further includes instructions for ranking the plurality of potential meeting facilities based on a predetermined quality rating of the meeting facilities.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 44 words
The system of claim 10 , wherein the memory further includes instructions for calculating the all-inclusive cost based on at least a range of dates, a list of attendees of the meeting, and, for each of the attendees on the list, an originating location.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 31 words
The system of claim 13 , wherein the instructions for calculating the all-inclusive cost further perform the function of querying a database for information relating to the plurality of meeting facilities.
Claim 17
Independent Claim 128 words
A method of evaluating a plurality of potential meeting facilities for an optimal meeting facility, the method comprising: defining minimum requirements for the optimal meeting facility; transmitting the minimum requirements to an application server; receiving a list of ranked meeting facilities, the list being ranked based on all-inclusive cost calculation corresponding to an estimated total cost of holding the meeting at each meeting facility; choosing preferences for meeting facilities from the list of ranked meeting facilities; choosing specific geographic locations corresponding to a geographic location of at least one of the meeting facilities in the list; transmitting the preferences and the specific geographic location to the application server; and receiving an updated list of meeting facilities from the application server based on the chosen preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 18
Independent Claim 128 words
A method of evaluating a plurality of potential meeting facilities for an optimal meeting facility, the method comprising: defining minimum requirements for the optimal meeting facility; transmitting the minimum requirements to an application server; receiving a list of ranked meeting facilities, the list being ranked based on all-inclusive cost calculation corresponding to an estimated total cost of holding the meeting at each meeting facility; choosing preferences for meeting facilities from the list of ranked meeting facilities; choosing specific geographic locations corresponding to a geographic location of at least one of the meeting facilities in the list; transmitting the preferences and the specific geographic location to the application server; and receiving an updated list of meeting facilities from the application server based on the chosen preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of claim 15 , further comprising: choosing one or more of the meeting facilities from the updated list and making a reservation at the chosen facility via an electronic request for proposal.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 144 words
A computer readable medium containing instructions that when executed by a processor causes the processor to perform selection of a meeting facility for hosting a meeting by: receiving a range of dates, a list of attendees of the meeting, and an originating location for each of the attendees; calculating an all-inclusive cost for hosting the meeting at each of a plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the specified range of dates and the specified list of attendees; ranking the plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the calculated all-inclusive costs; receiving a list of preferences and geographic locations corresponding to the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities; and removing facilities from the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities which do not contain the preferences and which do not correspond to the geographic locations specified in the received list of preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 144 words
A computer readable medium containing instructions that when executed by a processor causes the processor to perform selection of a meeting facility for hosting a meeting by: receiving a range of dates, a list of attendees of the meeting, and an originating location for each of the attendees; calculating an all-inclusive cost for hosting the meeting at each of a plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the specified range of dates and the specified list of attendees; ranking the plurality of potential meeting facilities based on the calculated all-inclusive costs; receiving a list of preferences and geographic locations corresponding to the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities; and removing facilities from the ranked plurality of potential meeting facilities which do not contain the preferences and which do not correspond to the geographic locations specified in the received list of preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 29 words
The computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the calculating further includes estimating a cost for each said attendee to travel to each of the plurality of facilities.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 27 words
The computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the calculating further includes estimating a meal cost for each attendee at each of the plurality of facilities.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 27 words
The computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the calculating further includes estimating a lodging cost for each attendee at each of the plurality of facilities.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 21 words
The computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the calculating further includes estimating a conference room cost for the meeting.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 28 words
The computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the calculating the all-inclusive cost for hosting the meeting includes calculating optimized costs and summing the calculated optimized costs.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 24 words
The computer readable medium of claim 22 , wherein calculating optimized costs includes calculating a minimum cost for ground transportation to and from airports.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 53 words
The computer readable medium of claim 22 , wherein calculating optimized costs includes finding a lowest airfare among airport pairs corresponding to a first airport from a set of airports near an origin location of the attendees and a second airport from a set of airports near a destination location of the attendees.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 24 words
The computer readable medium of claim 22 , wherein calculating optimized costs includes calculating a minimum costs for a plurality of ranges of dates.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 139 words
A computer readable medium containing instructions that when executed by a processor causes the processor to evaluate a plurality of potential meeting facilities for an optimal meeting facility by: defining minimum requirements for the optimal meeting facility; transmitting the minimum requirements to an application server; receiving a list of ranked meeting facilities, the list being ranked based on all-inclusive cost calculation corresponding to an estimated total cost of holding the meeting at each meeting facility; choosing preferences for meeting facilities from the list of ranked meeting facilities; choosing specific geographic locations corresponding to a geographic location of at least one of the meeting facilities in the list; transmitting the preferences and the specific geographic location to the application server; and receiving an updated list of meeting facilities from the application server based on the chosen preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 139 words
A computer readable medium containing instructions that when executed by a processor causes the processor to evaluate a plurality of potential meeting facilities for an optimal meeting facility by: defining minimum requirements for the optimal meeting facility; transmitting the minimum requirements to an application server; receiving a list of ranked meeting facilities, the list being ranked based on all-inclusive cost calculation corresponding to an estimated total cost of holding the meeting at each meeting facility; choosing preferences for meeting facilities from the list of ranked meeting facilities; choosing specific geographic locations corresponding to a geographic location of at least one of the meeting facilities in the list; transmitting the preferences and the specific geographic location to the application server; and receiving an updated list of meeting facilities from the application server based on the chosen preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 36 words
The computer readable medium of claim 26 , further comprising: choosing one or more of the meeting facilities from the updated list and making a reservation at the chosen facility via an electronic request for proposal.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 145 words
A computer system comprising: a processor; a network connection; and a memory, the memory including instructions that when executed by the processor evaluate a plurality of potential meeting facilities for an optimal meeting facility by: defining minimum requirements for the optimal meeting facility; transmitting the minimum requirements to an application server; receiving a list of ranked meeting facilities, the list being ranked based on all-inclusive cost calculation corresponding to an estimated total cost of holding the meeting at each meeting facility; choosing preferences for meeting facilities from the list of ranked meeting facilities; choosing specific geographic locations corresponding to a geographic location of at least one of the meeting facilities in the list; transmitting the preferences and the specific geographic location to the application server; and receiving an updated list of meeting facilities from the application server based on the chosen preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 145 words
A computer system comprising: a processor; a network connection; and a memory, the memory including instructions that when executed by the processor evaluate a plurality of potential meeting facilities for an optimal meeting facility by: defining minimum requirements for the optimal meeting facility; transmitting the minimum requirements to an application server; receiving a list of ranked meeting facilities, the list being ranked based on all-inclusive cost calculation corresponding to an estimated total cost of holding the meeting at each meeting facility; choosing preferences for meeting facilities from the list of ranked meeting facilities; choosing specific geographic locations corresponding to a geographic location of at least one of the meeting facilities in the list; transmitting the preferences and the specific geographic location to the application server; and receiving an updated list of meeting facilities from the application server based on the chosen preferences and geographic locations.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim 34 words
The system of claim 28 , further comprising: choosing one or more of the meeting facilities from the updated list and making a reservation at the chosen facility via an electronic request for proposal.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4445181A Cited
US5053956A Cited
US4885685A Cited
WO1995026007A1 Cited
US5832453A Cited
US5948040A Cited
US5799286A Cited
US6009408A Cited
WO1999001822A1 Cited
JPH11227369A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2004-11-26 2005-05-28 2005-11-27 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2008-11-26 2009-05-28 2009-11-27 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2012-11-26 2013-05-28 2013-11-27 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag