US6233495B1
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Methods for modeling two-dimensional responses of cross-machine direction actuators in sheet-forming processes
Assignee: ABB Automation Inc
•
Filing: 1998-06-12
•
Granted: 2001-05-15
•
Expires: 2018-06-12
Abstract
Abstract A plurality of random probing sequences are used to perturb a corresponding plurality of cross-machine direction (CD) actuators of a web manufacturing machine. The web of sheet material is measured as the CD actuators are perturbed. The global process machine direction (MD) dynamics is estimated and a CD response is estimated for each of the plurality of CD actuators using the plurality of random probing sequences, measurements of the web of sheet material and the estimated global process MD dynamics. The estimated global process MD dynamics and the estimated CD responses form 2D responses for the plurality of CD actuators. To refine the 2D responses, the estimates of global process MD dynamics, and CD responses for each of the plurality of CD actuators are iterated. The actuator dynamics of the plurality of CD actuators may also be estimated and used in the estimates of the global process MD dynamics of the plurality of CD actuators and CD responses for each of the plurality of CD actuators. Variations that are not associated with actuator responses are removed from the estimated CD responses, for example by filtering. The estimated CD responses may be further refined by selecting one of the CD responses as a reference response. All remaining CD responses are shifted into alignment with the reference response to determine relative CD response locations and to define a group of overlapping CD responses. Using iterative techniques, a mean response is determined from a group of overlapping CD responses and variation bounds are set above and below the mean response. A family of probable CD responses are generated within the variation bounds and a most probable response is selected from the family of probable responses for each CD actuator response. The CD response for each CD actuator is replaced with the most probable response shifted by an appropriate amount for each CD actuator and multiplied by an optimal gain.
Inventors
- 👤 Shih-Chin Chen
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 14:42
CPC Classifications
D; D21; D21G; D21G9/00; D21G9/0009; D21G9/0027; G; G01; G01N; G01N33/00; G01N33/34; G01N33/346
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
153 words
A method for modeling two-dimensional (2D) responses, machine direction (MD) and cross-machine direction (CD), of a plurality of CD actuators extending across the width of a machine used for manufacturing a web of sheet material, said method comprising the steps of: selecting a plurality of random probing sequences corresponding to said plurality of CD actuators; perturbing said plurality of CD actuators with said plurality of random probing sequences; measuring said web of sheet material being formed while perturbing said plurality of CD actuators with said plurality of random probing sequences; estimating global process MD dynamics of said plurality of CD actuators; and estimating a CD response for each of said plurality of CD actuators by using said plurality of random probing sequences, measurements of said web of sheet material and estimated global process MD dynamics, said global process MD dynamics and said CD responses forming 2D responses for said plurality of CD actuators.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
153 words
A method for modeling two-dimensional (2D) responses, machine direction (MD) and cross-machine direction (CD), of a plurality of CD actuators extending across the width of a machine used for manufacturing a web of sheet material, said method comprising the steps of: selecting a plurality of random probing sequences corresponding to said plurality of CD actuators; perturbing said plurality of CD actuators with said plurality of random probing sequences; measuring said web of sheet material being formed while perturbing said plurality of CD actuators with said plurality of random probing sequences; estimating global process MD dynamics of said plurality of CD actuators; and estimating a CD response for each of said plurality of CD actuators by using said plurality of random probing sequences, measurements of said web of sheet material and estimated global process MD dynamics, said global process MD dynamics and said CD responses forming 2D responses for said plurality of CD actuators.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
43 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising repeating the steps of estimating global process MD dynamics, and estimating a CD response for each of said plurality of CD actuators to thereby refine said 2D responses for said plurality of CD actuators.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
59 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising the step of estimating the actuator dynamics of said plurality of CD actuators, said steps of estimating global process MD dynamics of said plurality of CD actuators and estimating a CD response for each of said plurality of CD actuators using estimated actuator dynamics of said plurality of CD actuators.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
227 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said step of estimating global process MD dynamics comprises the steps of: determining measurement changes in said web of sheet material due to perturbation by said plurality of random probing sequences; calculating eigenvalues-eigenvectors of a covariance matrix of said measurement changes; selecting the eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue to be a dominant CD profile of said measurement changes; convoluting said measurement changes with said dominant CD profile of said measurement changes to obtain a temporal evolution of said dominant CD profile in said measurement changes; determining estimated changes in measured sheet material based on said plurality of random probing sequences and said estimated CD responses of said plurality of CD actuators; convoluting said estimated changes with said dominant CD profile of said measurement changes to obtain a temporal evolution of said dominant CD profile in said estimated changes; taking the difference between said temporal evolution of said dominant CD profile in said measurement changes and said temporal evolution of said dominant CD profile in said estimated changes processed by a selected global process MD dynamics to form a MD modeling error; minimizing said MD modeling error by selecting an optimal global process MD dynamics model; and using said optimal global process MD dynamics model resulting from minimizing said MD modeling error as an estimated global process MD dynamics.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
82 words
A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein said step of calculating eigenvalues-eigenvectors of said measurement changes comprises decomposing said covariance matrix of said measurement changes using singular value decomposition, and said step of selecting the eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue to be a dominant CD profile of said measurement changes comprises the step of selecting a dominant CD profile of said measurement changes from a factor obtained from said singular value decomposition of said covariance matrix of said measurement changes.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
139 words
A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein said step of estimating a CD response for each of said plurality of CD actuators comprises the steps of: predicting measurement changes in said web of sheet material due to perturbation by said plurality of random probing sequences using said estimated global process MD dynamics and a selected CD response for each of said plurality of CD actuators; taking the difference between said measurement changes and predicted measurement changes to form a CD modeling error; minimizing a Frobenius norm of said CD modeling error by selecting an optimal CD response for each of said plurality of CD actuators; and using said optimal CD responses for said plurality of CD actuators which minimize the Frobenius norm of said CD modeling error as the estimated CD responses for said plurality of CD actuators.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
46 words
A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein said optimal CD responses for said plurality of CD actuators which minimize the Frobenius norm of said CD modeling errors is expressed by the equation: Ĝ=[ΔY]{tilde over (W)} T [{tilde over (W)}{tilde over (W)} T ] −1 .
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
260 words
A method as claimed in claim 6 further comprising the steps of repeating the steps of: determining estimated changes in measured sheet material based on said plurality of random probing sequences and said estimated CD responses of said plurality of CD actuators; convoluting said estimated changes with said dominant CD profile of said measurement changes to obtain a temporal evolution of said dominant CD profile in said estimated changes; taking the difference between said temporal evolution of said dominant CD profile in said measurement changes and said temporal evolution of said dominant CD profile in said estimated changes processed by a selected global process MD dynamics to form a MD modeling error; minimizing said MD modeling error by selecting an optimal global process MD dynamics model; using said optimal global process MD dynamics model resulting from minimizing said MD modeling error as an estimated global process MD dynamics predicting measurement changes in said web of sheet material due to perturbation by said plurality of random probing sequences using said estimated global process MD dynamics and a selected CD response for each of said plurality of CD actuators; taking the difference between said measurement changes and predicted measurement changes to form a CD modeling error; minimizing the Frobenius norm of said CD modeling error by selecting an optimal CD response for each of said plurality of CD actuators; and using said optimal CD responses for said plurality of CD actuators which minimize the Frobenius norm of said CD modeling error as the estimated CD responses for said plurality of CD actuators.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
32 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising the step of removing variations that are not associated with actuator responses from said estimated CD responses for said plurality of CD actuators.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as claimed in claim 9 wherein said step of removing variations that are not associated with actuator responses comprises the step of smoothing said estimated CD responses for said CD actuators.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
235 words
A method as claimed in claim 9 further comprising the steps of: selecting one of said CD responses as an initial reference response; shifting all remaining CD responses in the cross machine direction into alignment with said initial reference response to determine relative CD response locations and define a group of overlapping CD responses; determining a mean response from said group of overlapping CD responses; shifting said CD responses in the cross machine direction into alignment with said mean response to determine new relative CD response locations and define a new group of overlapping CD responses; determining a new mean response from said new group of overlapping CD responses; repeating the steps of shifting said CD responses in the cross machine direction into alignment with said mean response and determining a new mean response until said new mean response converges within a selected tolerance to form a converged new mean response; using said converged new mean response as said mean response; setting variation bounds above and below said mean response; generating a family of probable CD responses within said variation bounds; selecting an optimal gain and a most probable response from said family of probable responses for each CD actuator response; and replacing the CD response for each CD actuator with the most probable response multiplied by said optimal gain and shifted in the cross machine direction by an appropriate amount for each CD actuator.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as claimed in claim 11 further comprising the steps of: determining CD response boundaries of all CD responses beyond which boundaries the magnitudes of said mean response consistently become smaller than a specified percentage of a maximum of said mean response; and replacing said CD responses outside said boundaries with zero.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein said step of setting variation bounds is performed by setting variation bounds according to a specified confidence level.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
32 words
A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein said step of setting variation bounds is performed by setting variation bounds according to a multiple of a standard deviation of all CD responses.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein said step of generating a family of probable CD responses within said variation bounds comprises stretching or compressing said mean response with spline-interpolation.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
257 words
A method for refining a plurality of cross-machine direction (CD) responses for a corresponding plurality of CD actuators extending across the width of a machine used for manufacturing a web of sheet material, said method comprising the steps of: selecting one of said CD responses as an initial reference response; shifting all remaining CD responses in the cross machine direction into alignment with said initial reference response to determine relative CD response locations and define a group of overlapping CD responses; determining a mean response from said group of overlapping CD responses; shifting said CD responses in the cross machine direction into alignment with said mean response to determine new relative CD response locations and define a new group of overlapping CD responses; determining a new mean response from said new group of overlapping CD responses; repeating the steps of shifting said CD responses in the cross machine direction into alignment with said mean response and determining a new mean response until said new mean response converges within a selected tolerance to form a converged new mean response; using said converged new mean response as said mean response; setting variation bounds above and below said mean response; generating a family of probable CD responses within said variation bounds; selecting an optimal gain and a most probable response from said family of probable responses for each CD actuator response; and replacing the CD response for each CD actuator with the most probable response multiplied by said optimal gain and shifted by an appropriate amount for each CD actuator.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
257 words
A method for refining a plurality of cross-machine direction (CD) responses for a corresponding plurality of CD actuators extending across the width of a machine used for manufacturing a web of sheet material, said method comprising the steps of: selecting one of said CD responses as an initial reference response; shifting all remaining CD responses in the cross machine direction into alignment with said initial reference response to determine relative CD response locations and define a group of overlapping CD responses; determining a mean response from said group of overlapping CD responses; shifting said CD responses in the cross machine direction into alignment with said mean response to determine new relative CD response locations and define a new group of overlapping CD responses; determining a new mean response from said new group of overlapping CD responses; repeating the steps of shifting said CD responses in the cross machine direction into alignment with said mean response and determining a new mean response until said new mean response converges within a selected tolerance to form a converged new mean response; using said converged new mean response as said mean response; setting variation bounds above and below said mean response; generating a family of probable CD responses within said variation bounds; selecting an optimal gain and a most probable response from said family of probable responses for each CD actuator response; and replacing the CD response for each CD actuator with the most probable response multiplied by said optimal gain and shifted by an appropriate amount for each CD actuator.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as claimed in claim 16 further comprising the steps of: determining CD response boundaries of all CD responses beyond which boundaries the magnitudes of said mean response consistently become smaller than a specified percentage of a maximum of said mean response; and replacing said CD responses outside said boundaries with zero.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method as claimed in claim 16 wherein said step of setting variation bounds is performed by setting variation bounds according to a specified confidence level.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
32 words
A method as claimed in claim 16 wherein said step of setting variation bounds is performed by setting variation bounds according to a multiple of a standard deviation of all CD responses.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method as claimed in claim 16 wherein said step of generating a family of probable CD responses within said variation bounds comprises stretching or compressing said mean response with spline-interpolation.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4451878A
Cited
EP0334698A2
Cited
WO1991005105A1
Cited
US5122963A
Cited
US5470005A
Cited
US5400258A
Cited
US5539634A
Cited
US6086237A
Cited
US5715158A
Cited
US5893055A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2004-05-14 | 2004-11-13 | 2005-05-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2008-05-14 | 2008-11-13 | 2009-05-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2012-05-14 | 2012-11-13 | 2013-05-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |