US6151487A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Demodulation structure for fast fading cellular channels
Assignee: The AT&T MVPD Group LLC
•
Filing: 1999-08-31
•
Granted: 2000-11-21
•
Expires: 2019-08-31
Abstract
Abstract A demodulator and demodulating technique is provided which automatically switches modes according to the flat-fading or multipath channel status of an incoming signal. If an incoming signal has delay spread in addition to fading a standard Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimator (MLSE) equalization is selected as an optimum demodulation mode. If the incoming signal is only flat-fading a symbol-based demodulation mode is selected. The Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimator (MLSE) equalizer mode is thus integrated with the symbol based mode. Channel status is first identified in order to do mode selection in the demodulator. A dual-mode receiver for demodulating both flat-fading and multipath signals in a communications system (FIG. 1) comprises a Baseband Digital Signal (DSP) Processor further comprising a Channel Identification Processor, the Channel Identification Processor computing a Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimate +E,uns +E,cir x+EE +EE =(+E,cir x+EE 0 +E,cir x+EE 1)t of a first ray channel response and a second ray channel response x0 and x1, t denoting a transpose, and determining a demodulation mode based upon a squared magnitude ratio GAMMA of +E,cir x+EE 1 and +E,cir x+EE 0 relative to a predetermined threshold.
Inventors
- 👤 In-Kyung Kim
- 👤 Wonjin Sung
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 14:58
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04L; H04L1/00; H04L1/02; H04L1/06; H04B; H04B7/00; H04B7/02; H04B7/04; H04B7/08; H04B7/0837; H04B7/0842; H04B7/0848; H04L25/00; H04L25/02; H04L25/03; H04L25/03006; H04L2025/03433; H04L2025/03535; H04L2025/03547; H04L2025/03566; H04L25/03178
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
103 words
A dual-mode receiver for demodulating both flat-fading and multipath signals in a communications system, the dual-mode receiver comprising: a Baseband Digital Signal Processor (DSP) further comprising: a Channel Identification Processor, the Channel Identification Processor computing a first ray channel response x 0 and a second ray channel response x 1 , and computing a Maximum Likelihood Estimate x=(x 0 x 1 ) t , t denoting a transpose, and determining one of a group of demodulation modes based upon a value of a squared magnitude ratio Γ of x 1 and x 0 relative to a predetermined threshold based upon system optimization requirements.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
103 words
A dual-mode receiver for demodulating both flat-fading and multipath signals in a communications system, the dual-mode receiver comprising: a Baseband Digital Signal Processor (DSP) further comprising: a Channel Identification Processor, the Channel Identification Processor computing a first ray channel response x 0 and a second ray channel response x 1 , and computing a Maximum Likelihood Estimate x=(x 0 x 1 ) t , t denoting a transpose, and determining one of a group of demodulation modes based upon a value of a squared magnitude ratio Γ of x 1 and x 0 relative to a predetermined threshold based upon system optimization requirements.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 1 wherein a single slot squared magnitude ratio Γ 1 for a single received slot is Γ.sub.1 =|x.sub.1 |.sup.2 /|x.sub.0 |.sup.2
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 1 wherein a multiple slot squared magnitude ratio Γ K for a plurality of k slots up to a maximum K slots is ##EQU22##
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 3 further comprising a Diversity Combiner wherein the Channel Identification Processor sends a mode selection signal to the Diversity Combiner identifying the determined demodulation mode.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
42 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 4 further comprising: an Equalizer coupled to the Diversity Combiner for demodulating the multi-path signals according to a Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) process; and a Channel Tracker coupled to the Diversity Combiner for updating channel information.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
44 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 5 further comprising a plurality of multipath channel taps for each of a group of antennas coupled to the receiver, and wherein selected ones of the plurality of multipath channel taps are zero-forced depending upon the mode selection signal.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
93 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 6 wherein the Channel Identification Processor comprises a First Channel Identification Processor and a Second Channel Identification Processor; a first antenna coupled to the First Channel Identification Processor and to the Diversity Combiner receives baseband digital samples, the First Channel Identification Processor sending a first mode selection signal A to the Diversity Combiner; a second antenna coupled to the Second Channel Identification Processor and to the Diversity Combiner receives baseband digital samples, the Second Channel Identification Processor sending a second mode selection signal B to the Diversity Combiner.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
72 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 7 wherein the first mode selection signal A is set to enable the first Antenna multipath channel taps, the second mode selection signal B is set to enable the second Antenna multipath channel taps, and wherein the Diversity Combiner performs Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimator (MLSE) equalization on the received baseband digital samples from the first and second antenna to nearly optimize the demodulation of a multipath signal.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
64 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 7 wherein the first mode selection signal A is set to disable the first Antenna multipath channel taps, the second mode selection signal B is set to disable the second Antenna multipath channel taps, and wherein the dual-mode receiver further comprises a symbol-based receiver coupled to the Baseband DSP to nearly optimize demodulation of the received baseband digital samples.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
74 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 7 wherein the first mode selection signal A is set to disable the first Antenna multipath channel taps and the second mode selection signal B is set to disable the second Antenna multipath channel taps, and wherein the Diversity Combiner zero-forces the first Antenna and the second Antenna multipath channel taps before running the Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) Equalizer to optimize demodulation of the received baseband digital samples.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
70 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 7 wherein the first mode selection signal A is set to enable the first Antenna multipath channel taps and the second mode selection signal B is set to disable the second Antenna multipath channel taps, and wherein the Diversity Combiner zero-forces the second Antenna multipath channel taps before running the Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) Equalizer to optimize demodulation of the received baseband digital samples.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
67 words
The dual-mode receiver of claim 1 wherein the Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) process is performed according to a channel estimation model wherein: ##EQU23## and wherein y l denotes modeled received samples, d l denotes training sequence symbols for a sequence element l, an element of a sequence of length L+1, and τ denotes a set of symbol indexes represented as {1 . . . , L}.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
106 words
A method for dual-mode demodulation for both flat-fading and multipath signals in a communications system (FIG. 1), the method comprising: computing a first ray channel response estimate x 0 and a second ray channel response estimate x 1 at a channel ID processor; computing a Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimate x=(x 0 x 1 ) t of x 1 and x 0 , t denoting a transpose, at a Channel Identification Processor; and determining one of a group of demodulation modes based upon a value of a squared magnitude ratio Γ of x 1 and x 0 relative to a predetermined threshold based upon system optimization requirements.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
106 words
A method for dual-mode demodulation for both flat-fading and multipath signals in a communications system (FIG. 1), the method comprising: computing a first ray channel response estimate x 0 and a second ray channel response estimate x 1 at a channel ID processor; computing a Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimate x=(x 0 x 1 ) t of x 1 and x 0 , t denoting a transpose, at a Channel Identification Processor; and determining one of a group of demodulation modes based upon a value of a squared magnitude ratio Γ of x 1 and x 0 relative to a predetermined threshold based upon system optimization requirements.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 13 wherein the step of determining includes computing a value Γ 1 of a single slot squared magnitude ratio for a single slot as: Γ.sub.1 =|x.sub.1 |.sup.2 /|x.sub.0 |.sup.2.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 13 wherein the step of determining includes computing a value Γ K of a multiple slot squared magnitude ratio for a plurality of slots as: ##EQU24##
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 15 further including the step of sending a mode selection signal from the Channel Identification Processor to the Diversity Combiner to identify the determined demodulation mode.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
69 words
The method of claim 16 further including the steps of: receiving signals at a first antenna; receiving signals at a second antenna; zero-forcing selected ones of a plurality of multipath channel taps for each of the first and second antennas, the first antenna coupled to a first channel Identification Processor, and the second antenna coupled to a second channel Identification Processor, the zero-forcing depending upon the mode selection signal.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method of claim 17 further including the steps of: sending a first mode selection signal from the first channel identification processor to the Diversity Combiner; and sending a second mode selection signal from the second channel identification processor to the Diversity Combiner.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 18 further including the steps of: enabling multipath channel taps associated with the first antenna; enabling multipath channel taps associated with the second antenna; and performing Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) equalization on received baseband digital samples from the first and second antenna to nearly optimize the demodulation of a multipath signal.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 18 further including the steps of: disabling multipath channel taps associated with the first antenna; disabling multipath channel taps associated with the second antenna; and performing symbol-based demodulation upon received baseband digital samples to nearly optimize demodulation.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 18 further including the steps of: disabling multipath channel taps associated with the first antenna; disabling multipath channel taps associated with the second antenna; and zero-forcing the first antenna multipath taps and the second antenna multipath channel taps; and performing Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) equalization upon received baseband digital samples.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 18 including the steps of: enabling the first antenna multipath channel taps; disabling the second antenna multipath channel taps; zero-forcing the second antenna multipath channel taps; and performing Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE) equalization to optimize demodulation of the received baseband digital samples.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2003-11-21 | 2004-05-22 | 2004-11-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2007-11-21 | 2008-05-22 | 2008-11-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2011-11-21 | 2012-05-22 | 2012-11-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |