Service contract for managing service systems

Claim 2

A service contract for managing service transactions between a plurality of parties each having a computer system coupled to a communication network and one or more applications running thereon, the service contract comprising: a specification of unambiguous rules of interaction for the parties during one or more of the transactions, the specification adapted to facilitate the generation of enforcer code associated with the one or more applications of each of the plurality of parties, the enforcer code capable of enabling interaction and enforcing the rules of interaction.

Claim 3

The service contract of claim 1 wherein, for any of the transactions, one of the parties is a client having a client application running on a client computer system and one of the parties is a service provider having a service application running on a server computer svstem and wherein the service contract specification is adapted to generate a client contract enforcer module to interface with the client application implementation logic and a server contract enforcer module to interface with the service application implementation logic.

Claim 4

The service contract of claim 2 wherein each of the enforcer modules is separate from the respective implementation logic.

Claim 5

The service contract of claim 2 wherein the specification is adapted to automatically generate the client contract enforcer module and the server contract enforcer module or configure preexisting contract enforcer modules.

Claim 6

The service contract of claim 2 wherein the client contract enforcer module is generated within the client application and/or the server contract enforcer module is generated within the service application.

Claim 7

The service contract of claim 2 wherein the client contract enforcer module and the server contract enforcer module are generated at one or more third parties.

Claim 8

The service contract of claim 2 wherein the enforcer modules are computer programs.

Claim 9

The service contract of claim 7 wherein the enforcer modules are independently developed by the respective parties.

Claim 10

The service contract of claim 1 wherein the enforcer code is generated to be separate from implementation logic of the applications so that the implementation logic of one party is not exposed to the application of the other party.

Claim 11

The service contract of claim 1 wherein the specification is adapted to automatically generate the enforcer code or configure preexisting enforcer code.

Claim 12

The service contract of claim 1 wherein the specification includes all the permitted interaction operations of the parties.

Claim 13

The service contract of claim 1 wherein the enforcer code associated with each of the plurality of parties is different from the other enforcer code.

Claim 14

The service contract of claim 1 wherein the rules of interaction include one or more of: allowable sequences of interactions, valid and invalid timings of interactions, state diagrams specifying interactions and conditions under which the service will be terminated, canceled or compensated.

Claim 15

The service contract of claim 1 wherein the specification supports long-running interactions or sequences of interactions.

Claim 16

The service contract of claim 1 wherein the specification is formally expressed in a computer-readable language that can be compiled or otherwise processed to generate the enforcer code.

Claim 17

The service contract of claim 1 wherein. for each transaction. each of the plurality of parties can act as a client and as a service provider.

Claim 18

The service contract of claim 1 wherein the communication network is a public access network or an enterprise network.

Claim 19

The service contract of claim 17 wherein the communication network is the Internet or the Web.

Claim 20

The service contract of claim 1 wherein the specification comprises one or more of: an identification field including all contractual parties, an overall properties field including information and rules regarding the service contract, a communication properties field including methods of communication between the parties, a role field including permissible roles and operations of the parties, a security field including security requirements, an actions field including actions performed by each permissible role, a method signatures field including documents or messages exchanged per action, a semantics field including semantic relationships across multiple messages, requests or responses, a responsiveness field including a time a requester must wait before taking independent action, a globally visible implementation field including changes in a state of interaction, a constraints and sequencing field including acceptability of requests at certain points based on interaction state and requester identity, a compensation rules field including circumstances under which certain past requests can be canceled, an error handling field including actions to take in the presence of an exception, and/or a legal aspects field including legally binding terms and conditions.

Claim 21

A service contract for managing service transactions between a plurality of parties, each having a computer system coupled to a communication network, at least one of the computer systems having one or more applications running thereon, the service contract comprising: a specification of unambiguous rules of interaction for the parties during one or more of the transactions, the specification adapted to facilitate the generation of enforcer code associated with operating environments of each of the plurality of parties, the enforcer code capable of enabling interaction and enforcing the rules of interaction.

Claim 22

A service contract for managing service transactions between a plurality of parties, each having a computer system coupled to a communication network, at least one of the computer systems having one or more applications running thereon, the service contract comprising: a specification of unambiguous rules of interaction for the parties during one or more of the transactions, the specification adapted to facilitate the generation of enforcer code associated with operating environments of each of the plurality of parties, the enforcer code capable of enabling interaction and enforcing the rules of interaction.

Claim 25

The method of claim 21 wherein the parties comprise a client having client implementation logic and a service provider having service implementation logic.

Claim 26

The method of claim 22 further comprising the step of interfacing the enforcer modules with the implementation logic.

Claim 27

The method of claim 21 wherein the generating step comprises the step of automatically generating, from the service contract, the enforcer modules.

Claim 28

The method of claim 22 wherein the generating step comprises the step of generating a client enforcer module at the client and a service provider enforcer module at the service provider. the enforcer modules being separate from the implementation logic.

Claim 29

The method of claim 25 further comprising the steps of: receiving, at the service provider, a request for a service transaction; determining, by the service provider enforcer module, the acceptability of the request; and invoking, responsive to the determining step, the service implementation logic.

Claim 30

The method of claim 26 wherein the determining step comprises the step of analyzing an interaction history and the rules of interaction.

Claim 31

The method of claim 26 wherein the invoking step comprises the step of invoking, upon the request being determined to be acceptable, the service implementation logic.

Claim 32

The method of claim 26 further comprising the step of sending a response from the service implementation logic through the service provider enforcer module, to the client.

Claim 33

The method of claim 21 wherein the generating step comprises the step of generating the enforcer modules at a third party enforcer.

Claim 34

The method of claim 21 wherein the providing step comprises the step of developing the at least one service contract.

Claim 35

The method of claim 31 wherein the developing step comprises the step of jointly developing, by the parties, the at least one contract.

Claim 36

The method of claim 21 wherein the registering step includes the step of collecting information on the local application.

Claim 37

The method of claim 33 wherein the registering step includes the step of collecting invocation and/or method call information.