← Back to Patent Explorer
US6128634A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method and apparatus for facilitating skimming of text

Assignee: Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp
•
Filing: 1998-01-06
•
Granted: 2000-10-03
•
Expires: 2018-01-06
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The electronic document reading and skimming system presents a document using a variable emphasis attribute. The emphasis varies based on a degree with which each term in the document represents the overall content of the document or the user's interest with respect to that document. The system and method of this invention calculates a score for each term that reflects the degree to which each term represents the overall content of the document, maps the scores to a variable emphasis attribute of a presentation system and then presents the document in accordance with the mapped scores.

Inventors

  • 👤 Gene Golovchinsky
  • 👤 William Noah Schlitt
  • 👤 Morgan N. Price

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 13:35
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F40/00; G06F40/20; G06F40/279; G06F40/284; G06F40/30; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S707/00; Y10S707/99931; Y10S707/99933

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 31
Claim 1
Independent Claim 100 words
A method for facilitating skimming by a user of a document presented on a presentation device using at least one variable emphasis attribute having at least three values, the document having a plurality of terms, the method comprising: determining a term-score for each of the plurality of terms; mapping the term-score for each of the plurality of terms onto one of the at least three values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute; and presenting to the user each of the plurality of terms of the document using the mapped values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 100 words
A method for facilitating skimming by a user of a document presented on a presentation device using at least one variable emphasis attribute having at least three values, the document having a plurality of terms, the method comprising: determining a term-score for each of the plurality of terms; mapping the term-score for each of the plurality of terms onto one of the at least three values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute; and presenting to the user each of the plurality of terms of the document using the mapped values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the term-score represents the degree to which each of the plurality of terms represents the overall content of the document.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 37 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the term-score is a product of a frequency of the term in the document and an inverse document frequency of the term in a set of documents including the presented document.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 12 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the term-score is a term frequency.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the term-score is a relative document frequency.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one variable emphasis attribute is at least one of color, font, font boldness, font width, length of presentation, volume, speed, pitch and frequency.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 43 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a command to remap the term-score from a user; remapping the term-scores to a different range of the at least one variable emphasis attribute in response to receiving the remap command; and re-presenting the document.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising converting the plurality of terms into canonical form prior to determining the term-score.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising assigning a predetermined value of the at least one variable emphasis attribute to stop words.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of presenting the document in a constant value of the at least one variable emphasis attribute.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 10 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the term-score is biased.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 15 words
The method of claim 11, wherein the term-score is biased based on identified document segments.
Claim 14
Independent Claim 94 words
An apparatus for facilitating skimming of a document by a user, the document having a plurality of terms, the apparatus comprising: a processing system that determines a term-score for each of the plurality of terms and that maps the term-score of each of the plurality of terms onto one of at least three values of at least one variable emphasis attribute usable to present the document; and a presentation system that presents each of the plurality of terms of the document using the corresponding mapped values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute.
Claim 15
Independent Claim 94 words
An apparatus for facilitating skimming of a document by a user, the document having a plurality of terms, the apparatus comprising: a processing system that determines a term-score for each of the plurality of terms and that maps the term-score of each of the plurality of terms onto one of at least three values of at least one variable emphasis attribute usable to present the document; and a presentation system that presents each of the plurality of terms of the document using the corresponding mapped values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 26 words
The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the term-score represents the degree to which each of the plurality of terms represents the overall content of the document.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 37 words
The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the term-score is a product of a frequency of the term in the document and an inverse document frequency of the term in a set of documents including the displayed documents.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 12 words
The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the term-score is the term frequency.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 13 words
The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the term-score is a relative document frequency.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 31 words
The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the at least one variable emphasis attribute is at least one of a color, font, boldness, width, length of presentation, volume, speed, pitch and frequency.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 11 words
The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising a variable emphasis adjuster.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 37 words
The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the processing system comprises a term-score remapping system that remaps the term-score for each term in response to an adjustment of the variable emphasis adjuster by a user of the apparatus.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 23 words
The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the processing system further comprises a canonicalizing system that converts the plurality of terms into canonical form.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 32 words
The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the processing system further comprises a stop word assignment system that assigns a minimum value of the at least one variable emphasis attribute to stop words.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 10 words
The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising a mode switch.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 29 words
The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the processing system comprises a term-score remapping system that remaps the term-score for each term based on a state of the mode switch.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 37 words
The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the term-score remapping system remaps the term-scores for each term to a single value of the at least one variable emphasis attribute in response to the state of the mode switch.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 10 words
The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the term-score is biased.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 15 words
The apparatus of claim 26, wherein the term-score is biased based on identified document segments.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 160 words
A graphical user interface for facilitating skimming by a user of a document, the document having a plurality of terms, the interface comprising: a processor that determines a term-score for each of the plurality of terms; a mapper that maps the term-score for each of the plurality of terms onto one of at least three values of at least one variable emphasis attribute; a display that displays at least one of the plurality of terms of the document using the mapped values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute; and a variable emphasis adjuster that is responsive to an adjustment by a user to remap the term-score for each of the plurality at terms onto one of the at least three values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute in accordance with the adjustment, wherein the display is responsive to the adjustment to redisplay at least one of the plurality of terms in accordance with the remapped values.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 160 words
A graphical user interface for facilitating skimming by a user of a document, the document having a plurality of terms, the interface comprising: a processor that determines a term-score for each of the plurality of terms; a mapper that maps the term-score for each of the plurality of terms onto one of at least three values of at least one variable emphasis attribute; a display that displays at least one of the plurality of terms of the document using the mapped values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute; and a variable emphasis adjuster that is responsive to an adjustment by a user to remap the term-score for each of the plurality at terms onto one of the at least three values of the at least one variable emphasis attribute in accordance with the adjustment, wherein the display is responsive to the adjustment to redisplay at least one of the plurality of terms in accordance with the remapped values.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US5692176A Cited
US5642520A Cited
US5963940A Cited
US5926811A Cited
US5987460A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2003-10-03 2004-04-03 2004-10-03 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2007-10-03 2008-04-03 2008-10-03 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2011-10-03 2012-04-03 2012-10-03 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag