US6069691A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Automated method and apparatus for evaluating the performance characteristics of endoscopes
Assignee: Hartford Hospital
•
Filing: 1999-02-23
•
Granted: 2000-05-30
•
Expires: 2019-02-23
Abstract
Abstract In an automated method and apparatus for evaluating the performance characteristics of endoscopes, a computer system receives and stores a first set of test signals indicative of the results of the tests performed. Each test is preferably performed by transmitting a beam of light defining a predetermined intensity pattern through the endoscope from a first end to a second end of the endoscope, and the test signals are indicative of the optical intensity at each of a plurality of predetermined locations within the transmitted beam. The test signals thereby provide an indication of the degree to which the endoscope attenuates the beam intensity. In the preferred embodiment, the following tests are performed in order to evaluate both the optical fibers and lens system of each endoscope: (i) a light loss test, (ii) a reflective symmetry test, (iii) a lighted fibers test, (iv) a geometric distortion test, and (v) a modulation transfer function (MTF) test. The computer system has a database of threshold values, each of which corresponds to a respective test and is used to determine if test results indicate acceptable or unacceptable performance characteristics. The test signals are compared with the threshold values, and the computer system generates a second set of signals indicative of one or more performance characteristics, which are responsive to both the test signals and signals indicative of the test type.
Inventors
- 👤 Eric Rosow
- 👤 Joseph Adam
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 18:54
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01M; G01M11/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
75 words
A method for evaluating performance characteristics of optical viewing instruments, comprising: generating a first set of signals indicative of intensities at predetermined locations in a beam of light transmitted through an optical viewing instrument, wherein the locations in the beam correspond to predetermined locations in the optical viewing instrument; and generating a second set of signals responsive to the first set of signals which are indicative of the performance characteristics of the optical viewing instrument.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
75 words
A method for evaluating performance characteristics of optical viewing instruments, comprising: generating a first set of signals indicative of intensities at predetermined locations in a beam of light transmitted through an optical viewing instrument, wherein the locations in the beam correspond to predetermined locations in the optical viewing instrument; and generating a second set of signals responsive to the first set of signals which are indicative of the performance characteristics of the optical viewing instrument.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the second set of signals are indicative of the degree to which the optical viewing instrument attenuates the intensity of the beam at predetermined locations in the beam.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the second set of signals are indicative of the degree to which the optical viewing instrument attenuates the beam within a predetermined intensity range of the beam.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 3, further comprising: generating a three-dimensional image in response to the first set of signals indicative of the attenuation of the beam.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 3, further comprising: generating an image in which each of a plurality of colors in the image corresponds to one of a plurality of intensity ranges.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 3, wherein the second set of signals are indicative of a plurality of intensity ranges, and the number of predetermined locations within the beam having an intensity within each intensity range.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 3, further comprising: comparing the second set of signals to signals indicative of a predetermined attenuation; and generating signals indicative of a passing condition if more than a predetermined number of locations define an attenuation less than the predetermined attenuation.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 2, further comprising: generating signals which are indicative of the degree to which the optical viewing instrument attenuates an intensity below a predetermined intensity at predetermined locations in the beam.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the second set of signals are indicative of the MTF at a location in the beam.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 9, further comprising: generating an image corresponding to the intensity variation along a plurality of approximately collinear locations in the beam.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 9, further comprising: generating signals indicative of a passing condition if the MTF at the location in the beam is greater than a predetermined MTF value.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 9, further comprising: generating signals indicative of the MTF at a plurality of locations; and generating signals indicative of a passing condition if each MTF is greater than a predetermined MTF value.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the second set of signals are indicative of the degrees to which the optical viewing instrument optically distorts the beam at predetermined locations in the beam.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 13, further comprising: generating an image corresponding to the intensity variation along a plurality of substantially collinear locations in the beam.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 13, further comprising: generating signals indicative of a passing condition if the optical distortion is greater than a predetermined distortion value.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method of claim 13, further comprising: generating signals indicative of the optical distortion at a plurality of locations, and generating further signals indicative of a passing condition if the plurality of optical distortions are each greater than a predetermined distortion value.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising: generating a database for storing the first set of signals, and for presenting a selected subset of the first set of signals.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 17, wherein the step of generating a database comprises: generating a database for storing the first set of signals, the second set of signals, and signals which uniquely identify the optical viewing instrument.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
69 words
An apparatus for evaluating performance characteristics of optical viewing instruments, comprising: means for generating intensity signals indicative of intensities at predetermined locations in a beam of light transmitted through an optical viewing instrument, wherein the locations in the beam correspond to predetermined locations in the optical viewing instrument; and means for generating signals responsive to the intensity signals and indicative of the performance characteristics of the optical viewing instrument.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
69 words
An apparatus for evaluating performance characteristics of optical viewing instruments, comprising: means for generating intensity signals indicative of intensities at predetermined locations in a beam of light transmitted through an optical viewing instrument, wherein the locations in the beam correspond to predetermined locations in the optical viewing instrument; and means for generating signals responsive to the intensity signals and indicative of the performance characteristics of the optical viewing instrument.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
71 words
An apparatus as defined in claim 19, further comprising: means for generating signals responsive to the intensity signals and indicative of the degree to which the optical viewing instrument attenuates the intensity of the beam at the predetermined locations within the beam; and means for generating signals indicative of a pass condition if more than a predetermined number of locations in the beam have an attenuation less than a predetermined attenuation.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
49 words
An apparatus as defined in claim 19, further comprising: means for generating signals responsive to the intensity signals and indicative of the MTF at a location in the beam; and means for generating signals indicative of a pass condition if the MTF is greater than a predetermined MTF value.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4375818A
Cited
US4402311A
Cited
US4349014A
Cited
US4716288A
Cited
US4562344A
Cited
US4543477A
Cited
US4686964A
Cited
US4590924A
Cited
US4621618A
Cited
US4742815A
Cited
US4930861A
Cited
US5045934A
Cited
US4996975A
Cited
US5115126A
Cited
US5270825A
Cited
US5469840A
Cited
US5503320A
Cited
US5534992A
Cited
US5539971A
Cited
US5545120A
Cited
US5747794A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2003-05-30 | 2003-11-29 | 2004-05-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2007-05-30 | 2007-11-29 | 2008-05-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2011-05-30 | 2011-11-29 | 2012-05-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |