Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 5
Claim 1
Independent Claim
109 words
A guided missile system using Proportional Guidance (PROGUIDE), wherein a guidance law algorithm directs tactical weapons to intercept against non-maneuvering targets, comprising means for commanding the achievement of angular acceleration, with commanded angular acceleration proportional to the difference between scaled line-of-sight rate and a missile velocity vector's angular rate; and means comprising an additional term which is added to PROGUIDE to account for line-of-sight angular acceleration due to target maneuvering; whereby the guidance law is an optimal guidance law in that it is a solution of linear-quadratic regulator control problem and minimizes deviations from a collision triangle over an entire period of homing flight, thereby indirectly minimizing miss distance.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
109 words
A guided missile system using Proportional Guidance (PROGUIDE), wherein a guidance law algorithm directs tactical weapons to intercept against non-maneuvering targets, comprising means for commanding the achievement of angular acceleration, with commanded angular acceleration proportional to the difference between scaled line-of-sight rate and a missile velocity vector's angular rate; and means comprising an additional term which is added to PROGUIDE to account for line-of-sight angular acceleration due to target maneuvering; whereby the guidance law is an optimal guidance law in that it is a solution of linear-quadratic regulator control problem and minimizes deviations from a collision triangle over an entire period of homing flight, thereby indirectly minimizing miss distance.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
162 words
A guided missile system using Proportional Guidance (PROGUIDE), wherein a guidance law algorithm directs a missile to intercept against a non-maneuvering target, comprising means for commanding the achievement of angular acceleration, with commanded angular acceleration σ M proportional to the difference between scaled line-of-sight rate K 1 σ T and the missile velocity vector's angular rate σ M , given as σ.sub.M =K.sub.2 (K.sub.1 σ.sub.T -σ.sub.M) where the factor K 1 is used as a damping coefficient and K 2 is a response lag tuning coefficient; and means comprising an additional term which is added to PROGUIDE to account for line-of-sight angular acceleration due to target maneuvering; given as ##EQU10## where λ is the inverse time constant of the target's relative angular maneuver; whereby the guidance law is an optimal guidance law in that it is a solution of linear-quadratic regulator control problems and minimizes deviations from a collision triangle over an entire period of homing flight, thereby indirectly minimizing miss distance.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
162 words
A guided missile system using Proportional Guidance (PROGUIDE), wherein a guidance law algorithm directs a missile to intercept against a non-maneuvering target, comprising means for commanding the achievement of angular acceleration, with commanded angular acceleration σ M proportional to the difference between scaled line-of-sight rate K 1 σ T and the missile velocity vector's angular rate σ M , given as σ.sub.M =K.sub.2 (K.sub.1 σ.sub.T -σ.sub.M) where the factor K 1 is used as a damping coefficient and K 2 is a response lag tuning coefficient; and means comprising an additional term which is added to PROGUIDE to account for line-of-sight angular acceleration due to target maneuvering; given as ##EQU10## where λ is the inverse time constant of the target's relative angular maneuver; whereby the guidance law is an optimal guidance law in that it is a solution of linear-quadratic regulator control problems and minimizes deviations from a collision triangle over an entire period of homing flight, thereby indirectly minimizing miss distance.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
100 words
A guided missile system according to claim 7, wherein K 1 =1 and the target has constant relative angular acceleration (λ=0), and Augmented PROGUIDE reduces to σ.sub.M =K.sub.2 (σ.sub.T -σ.sub.M)+σ.sub.T which states that if there is any deviation from the collision triangle caused by relative angular target acceleration (i.e., angular LOS acceleration σ T ), the angular acceleration σ M of the missile's velocity vector must not only account for the resulting angular velocity difference that appears in the first term, but must additionally keep up with the continuing constant angular acceleration of the target represented by the second term.