US6028518A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System for verifying attachment of an EAS marker to an article after tagging
Assignee: Checkpoint Systems Inc
•
Filing: 1998-06-04
•
Granted: 2000-02-22
•
Expires: 2018-06-04
Abstract
Abstract An electronic system verifies that an article has been tagged with an electronic article surveillance marker. The marker includes a resonant circuit for use in detecting the presence of the article by receiving an interrogation signal and returning a response signal. In the system, the physical presence of an article is detected using an article presence detector which outputs an article presence signal upon physical detection thereof. An interrogation zone is monitored with an interrogator for disturbances in the form of a response signal caused by the presence of a marker within the interrogation zone. The interrogator outputs an interrogator output signal when a marker is detected in the interrogation zone. The article presence signals and the interrogator output signals are received in a processor. After an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor determines whether an interrogator output signal is received as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article. The processor outputs either a first or second output signal depending upon whether after an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor receives an interrogator output signal as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article.
Inventors
- 👤 Mark J. Rankin
- 👤 Anthony F. Piccoli
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 20:23
CPC Classifications
G; G08; G08B; G08B13/00; G08B13/22; G08B13/24; G08B13/2402; G08B13/2465; G08B13/2468; G08B13/2471
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
184 words
A system for verifying that an article has been tagged with an electronic article surveillance marker, the marker including a resonant circuit for use in detecting the presence of the article by receiving an interrogation signal and returning a response signal, the system comprising: (a) an article presence detector for detecting the physical presence of an article and outputting an article presence signal upon physical detection thereof; (b) an interrogation zone; (c) an interrogator for monitoring the interrogation zone for disturbances in the form of a response signal caused by the presence of a marker within the interrogation zone which is associated with a physically detected tagged article within the interrogation zone, the interrogator outputting a predetermined output signal when such a marker is detected in the interrogation zone; and (d) a processor connected to the article presence detector and the interrogator for receiving respective output signals therefrom, whereby after an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor determines whether an interrogator output signal is received as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
184 words
A system for verifying that an article has been tagged with an electronic article surveillance marker, the marker including a resonant circuit for use in detecting the presence of the article by receiving an interrogation signal and returning a response signal, the system comprising: (a) an article presence detector for detecting the physical presence of an article and outputting an article presence signal upon physical detection thereof; (b) an interrogation zone; (c) an interrogator for monitoring the interrogation zone for disturbances in the form of a response signal caused by the presence of a marker within the interrogation zone which is associated with a physically detected tagged article within the interrogation zone, the interrogator outputting a predetermined output signal when such a marker is detected in the interrogation zone; and (d) a processor connected to the article presence detector and the interrogator for receiving respective output signals therefrom, whereby after an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor determines whether an interrogator output signal is received as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
47 words
A system according to claim 1 wherein the processor outputs a good output signal if after an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor receives an interrogator output signal as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
27 words
A system according to claim 2 further comprising: (e) an indicator connected to the processor, the indicator being activated if the processor outputs a good output signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
43 words
A system according to claim 2 further comprising: (e) a second counter connected to the processor, the second counter counting the total number of articles detected by the article presence detector which resulted in a good output signal being output by the processor.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
49 words
A system according to claim 1 wherein the processor outputs a bad output signal if after an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor does not receive an interrogator output signal as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
27 words
A system according to claim 5 further comprising: (e) an alarm connected to the processor, the alarm being activated if the processor outputs a bad output signal.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
A system according to claim 5 further comprising: (e) an indicator connected to the processor, the indicator being activated if the processor outputs a bad output signal.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
43 words
A system according to claim 5 further comprising: (e) a third counter connected to the processor, the third counter counting the total number of articles detected by the article presence detector which resulted in a bad output signal being output by the processor.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
52 words
A system according to claim 5 further comprising: (e) an assembly line having a conveyer for moving a succession of articles in a first direction; and (f) an article ejector connected to the processor for ejecting the currently physically detected article from the conveyer if the processor outputs a bad output signal.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
35 words
A system according to claim 1 wherein the processor detects whether the interrogator output signal is received during a time period in which an article presence signal of a newly detected article is being received.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
14 words
A system according to claim 1 wherein the processor is a programmable logic circuit.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
44 words
A system according to claim 1 further comprising: (e) an assembly line having a conveyer for moving a succession of articles in a first direction, wherein the article presence detector and the interrogation zone are located along a predetermined region of the assembly line.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
15 words
A system according to claim 1 wherein the article presence detector is a photodetection device.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
31 words
A system according to claim 1 further comprising: (e) a total counter connected to the processor, the total counter counting the total number of articles detected by the article presence detector.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
18 words
A system according to claim 1 where the interrogator output signal is a signal of a predetermined quality.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
165 words
A method for verifying that an article has been tagged with an electronic article surveillance marker, the marker including a resonant circuit for use in detecting the presence of the article by receiving an interrogation signal and returning a response signal, the method comprising: (a) detecting the physical presence of an article using an article presence detector, the article presence detector outputting an article presence signal upon physical detection thereof; (b) monitoring an interrogation zone with an interrogator for disturbances in the form of a response signal caused by the presence of a marker within the interrogation zone, the interrogator outputting an interrogator output signal when a marker is detected in the interrogation zone; and (c) receiving the article presence signals and the interrogator output signals in a processor, whereby after an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor determines whether an interrogator output signal is received as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
165 words
A method for verifying that an article has been tagged with an electronic article surveillance marker, the marker including a resonant circuit for use in detecting the presence of the article by receiving an interrogation signal and returning a response signal, the method comprising: (a) detecting the physical presence of an article using an article presence detector, the article presence detector outputting an article presence signal upon physical detection thereof; (b) monitoring an interrogation zone with an interrogator for disturbances in the form of a response signal caused by the presence of a marker within the interrogation zone, the interrogator outputting an interrogator output signal when a marker is detected in the interrogation zone; and (c) receiving the article presence signals and the interrogator output signals in a processor, whereby after an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor determines whether an interrogator output signal is received as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
50 words
A method according to claim 16 further comprising: (d) outputting a good output signal by the processor if after an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor receives an interrogator output signal as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
52 words
A method according to claim 16 further comprising: (d) outputting a bad output signal by the processor if after an article presence signal is received from a newly physically detected article, the processor does not receive an interrogator output signal as a result of an interrogation of the newly physically detected article.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
56 words
A method according to claim 18 wherein a succession of articles move along an assembly line in a first direction by a conveyer, the assembly line including an article ejector connected to the processor, the method further comprising: (e) ejecting the newly physically detected article from the conveyer if the processor outputs a bad output signal.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
18 words
A method according to claim 16 wherein the interrogator output signal is a signal of a predetermined quality.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3752960A
Cited
US3816708A
Cited
US4223830A
Cited
US4580041A
Cited
US4647917A
Cited
US4675655A
Cited
US5081455A
Cited
US5463376A
Cited
US5455563A
Cited
US5182544A
Cited
US5276431A
Cited
US5347263A
Cited
US5430441A
Cited
US5446447A
Cited
US5495230A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2003-02-21 | 2003-08-23 | 2004-02-22 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2007-02-21 | 2007-08-23 | 2008-02-22 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2011-02-21 | 2011-08-23 | 2012-02-22 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |