US6002396A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System and method for defining a process structure for performing a task
Assignee: HYPERKNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SERVICES AG
•
Filing: 1994-10-27
•
Granted: 1999-12-14
•
Expires: 2014-10-27
Abstract
Abstract A system and method for defining a process structure for performing a task. The system comprises a computer, having a data storage memory, a keyboard for inputting data and a screen. A user inputs a first process definition which comprises a verb word and an object word defining the task for which a structure is to be created. The user is then able to define subsequent process definitions which are a predicted consequence of executing the first process definition or a predicted constituent step in executing the first process definition. By analyzing each process definition at each stage a complete process structure for performing the task can be built up and refined. The user is also able to specify particular object words falling within the meaning of the object word of a particular process definition which can be called up in tabular form on the screen, overwriting the display of process definitions in the process structure.
Inventors
- 👤 Trevor Bryan Davies
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 20:08
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q10/00; G06Q10/06; G06Q10/063; G06Q10/0631; G06Q10/06316; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S715/00; Y10S715/961; Y10S715/965; Y10S715/966; Y10S715/967
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 37
Claim 1
Independent Claim
183 words
A computer-readable medium encoded with a computer program which when executed on a computer directs performance of steps of: receiving from a user a first process definition; prompting a user of the computer to select of one of two complementary relationships, a first relationship defining how the first process is performed and a second relationship defining why the first process is performed; displaying representations of the first and second process definitions in a physical relationship in which the representations are logically connected by an indicator of the selected relationship; prompting the user to provide a verb and object that together define a first process; prompting the user to provide a verb and object that together define a second process; receiving from the user, plural instance of at least one of the first and the second processes; and displaying the plural instances in a two dimensional grid having one axis along which the plural instances are arrayed and another axis along which processes bearing the relationship of how are arrayed adjacent to each other, related instances of different processes aligned in a single row.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
183 words
A computer-readable medium encoded with a computer program which when executed on a computer directs performance of steps of: receiving from a user a first process definition; prompting a user of the computer to select of one of two complementary relationships, a first relationship defining how the first process is performed and a second relationship defining why the first process is performed; displaying representations of the first and second process definitions in a physical relationship in which the representations are logically connected by an indicator of the selected relationship; prompting the user to provide a verb and object that together define a first process; prompting the user to provide a verb and object that together define a second process; receiving from the user, plural instance of at least one of the first and the second processes; and displaying the plural instances in a two dimensional grid having one axis along which the plural instances are arrayed and another axis along which processes bearing the relationship of how are arrayed adjacent to each other, related instances of different processes aligned in a single row.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
33 words
The encoded medium of claim 1, wherein the computer program, when executed on a computer, further directs performance of steps of: for at least one instance received, further receiving at least one sub-instance.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
78 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the second process B defines one aspect of how the first process A is performed and a third process C defines another aspect of how the first process A is performed, the second process B defining a process required to be performed before the third process C, representations of the second process B and the third process C connected by an indicator of their sequential relationship, and forming a compound process A.B.C.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
136 words
A computer-implemented method of modeling a task, the method comprising: displaying on a display of a computer a first graphical element inviting entry of a first process definition; prompting a user of the computer to select of one of two complementary relationships, a first relationship defining how the first process is performed and a second relationship defining why the first process is performed; and displaying on the display a second graphical element adjacent to the first graphical element inviting entry of a second process definition related to the first process definition by the selected relationship; wherein prompting the user to select further comprises: displaying a graphical connector representative of the selected relationship between the first and second graphical elements; and displaying a control element which when activated toggles the graphical connector between the two complementary relationships.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
136 words
A computer-implemented method of modeling a task, the method comprising: displaying on a display of a computer a first graphical element inviting entry of a first process definition; prompting a user of the computer to select of one of two complementary relationships, a first relationship defining how the first process is performed and a second relationship defining why the first process is performed; and displaying on the display a second graphical element adjacent to the first graphical element inviting entry of a second process definition related to the first process definition by the selected relationship; wherein prompting the user to select further comprises: displaying a graphical connector representative of the selected relationship between the first and second graphical elements; and displaying a control element which when activated toggles the graphical connector between the two complementary relationships.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 4, wherein activation of the control element toggles the graphical connector between representing that the second process defines how the first process is performed and representing that the first process defines why the second process is performed.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 5, wherein the graphical connector indicates a relationship between the first and second graphical elements as perceived by one of the first and second graphical elements, and toggling the graphical connector indicates the relationship as perceived by another of the first and second graphical elements.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 4, wherein displaying the first graphical element and displaying the second graphical element each further comprises: prompting the user to provide a verb and object that together define the process.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
79 words
The method of claim 7, wherein the second process B defines one aspect of how the first process A is performed and a third process C defines another aspect of how the first process A is performed, the second process B defining a process required to be performed before the third process C, representations of the second process B and the third process C connected by an indicator of their sequential relationship, and forming a compound process of A.B.C.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 7, wherein displaying a first graphical element inviting entry of a first process definition further comprises: displaying a graphical control which when activated invites entry of at least one instance of the first process.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 9, further comprising: inviting entry of at least one sub-instance of the instance.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 9, further comprising: inviting promotion of an instance to a process selection field; and displaying only those processes relevant to the promoted instance.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 11, further comprising: displaying the instances in a tabular format having rows representative of different instances of the first process and columns representative of the processes, wherein instances of processes other than the first process are associated with corresponding instances of the first process.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
90 words
The method of claim 12, wherein the columns represent the first process, the second process and a third process, and wherein the second process defines how the first process is performed and the third process defines how the second process is performed, and wherein an instance a of the first process is associated with an instance b of the second process which is associated with an instance c of the third process, forming a compound instance a.b.c, the method further comprising: disassociating a compound instance b.c, from the instance a.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 11, further comprising: displaying a table for a process, each row of the table containing one instance of the process.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 14, further comprising: selecting one instance of the table; and displaying a table of sub-instances of the selected instance.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
167 words
A computer-implemented method of structuring development of a computer model of a task by a user, the method comprising: prompting the user to input into a computer a first process definition, the first process being one component of performing the task; prompting a user of the computer to select of one of two complementary relationships, a first relationship defining how the first process is performed and a second relationship defining why the first process is performed; displaying on a display of the computer representations of the first and second process definitions in a manner indicating the one of the first or second relationship; receiving from the user plural instances of at least one of the first and the second processes; and displaying the plural instances in a two dimensional grid having one axis along which the plural instances are arrayed and another axis along which processes bearing the relationship of how are arrayed adjacent to each other, related instances of different processes aligned in a single row.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
167 words
A computer-implemented method of structuring development of a computer model of a task by a user, the method comprising: prompting the user to input into a computer a first process definition, the first process being one component of performing the task; prompting a user of the computer to select of one of two complementary relationships, a first relationship defining how the first process is performed and a second relationship defining why the first process is performed; displaying on a display of the computer representations of the first and second process definitions in a manner indicating the one of the first or second relationship; receiving from the user plural instances of at least one of the first and the second processes; and displaying the plural instances in a two dimensional grid having one axis along which the plural instances are arrayed and another axis along which processes bearing the relationship of how are arrayed adjacent to each other, related instances of different processes aligned in a single row.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 16, wherein prompting the user to input the first process definition further comprises: prompting the user to provide a verb and object that together define the process.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 16, wherein prompting the user to input the second process definition further comprises: prompting the user to provide a verb and object that together define the process.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 16, further comprising: for at least one instance received, further receiving at least one sub-instance.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
88 words
The method of claim 16, further comprising: displaying on a computer display a first graphical element inviting entry of a first process definition; prompting a user to select of one of two complementary relationships, a first relationship defining how the first process is performed and a second relationship defining why the first process is performed; and displaying on a computer display a second graphical element adjacent to the first graphical element inviting entry of a second process definition related to the first process definition by the selected relationship.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 20, wherein displaying the first graphical element and displaying the second graphical element each further comprise a step of: prompting the user to provide a verb and object that together define the process.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 21, wherein displaying a first graphical element inviting entry of a first process definition further comprises: displaying a graphical control which when activated invites entry of at least one instance of the first process.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 22, further comprising: inviting entry of at least one sub-instance of the instance.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 22, further comprising: inviting promotion of an instance to a process selection field; and displaying only those processes relevant to the promoted instance.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 24, further comprising: displaying the instances in a tabular format having rows representative of different instances of the first process and columns representative of the processes, wherein instances of processes other than the first process are associated with corresponding instances of the first process.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
90 words
The method of claim 25, wherein the columns represent the first process, the second process and a third process, and wherein the second process defines how the first process is performed and the third process defines how the second process is performed, and wherein an instance a of the first process is associated with an instance b of the second process which is associated with an instance c of the third process, forming a compound instance a.b.c, the method further comprising: disassociating a compound instance b.c from the instance a.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 24, further comprising: displaying a table for a process, each row of the table containing one instance of the process.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 27, further comprising: selecting one instance of the table; and displaying a table of sub-instances of the selected instance.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
146 words
A computer implemented method of structuring development of a computer model of a task by a user, the method comprising: prompting the user to input into a computer a first process definition, the first process being one component of performing the task; prompting a user of the computer to select of one of two complementary relationships, a first relationship defining how the first process is performed and a second relationship defining why the first process is performed; and displaying on a display of the computer representations of the first and second process definitions in a manner indicating the one of the first or second relationship; wherein prompting a user to select further comprises: displaying a graphical connector representative of the selected relationship between the first and second graphical elements; and displaying a control element which when activated toggles the graphical connector between the two complementary relationships.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
146 words
A computer implemented method of structuring development of a computer model of a task by a user, the method comprising: prompting the user to input into a computer a first process definition, the first process being one component of performing the task; prompting a user of the computer to select of one of two complementary relationships, a first relationship defining how the first process is performed and a second relationship defining why the first process is performed; and displaying on a display of the computer representations of the first and second process definitions in a manner indicating the one of the first or second relationship; wherein prompting a user to select further comprises: displaying a graphical connector representative of the selected relationship between the first and second graphical elements; and displaying a control element which when activated toggles the graphical connector between the two complementary relationships.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 29, wherein activation of the control element toggles the graphical connector between representing that the second process defines how the first process is performed and representing that the first process defines why the second process is performed.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 30, wherein the graphical connector indicates a relationship between the first and second graphical elements as perceived by one of them, and toggling the graphical connector indicates the relationship as perceived by another of them.
Claim 36
Independent Claim
146 words
A method of presenting on a display medium a model of a task including representations of a plurality of processes, the method comprising: arranging the representations in such a manner on the display medium that it is evident from the arrangement when a first process defines at least one aspect of how a second process is performed and when the second process defines at least one aspect of why the first process is performed; including in the representations, instances of the plurality of processes, thus defining what one of the processes are modeled; and displaying a table of instances associated with one of the plurality of processes; wherein displaying the table further comprises: arranging along one axis of the table the plurality of processes, the first and second processes located in adjacent relationship to each other; and arranging along another axis of the table the instances.
Claim 37
Independent Claim
146 words
A method of presenting on a display medium a model of a task including representations of a plurality of processes, the method comprising: arranging the representations in such a manner on the display medium that it is evident from the arrangement when a first process defines at least one aspect of how a second process is performed and when the second process defines at least one aspect of why the first process is performed; including in the representations, instances of the plurality of processes, thus defining what one of the processes are modeled; and displaying a table of instances associated with one of the plurality of processes; wherein displaying the table further comprises: arranging along one axis of the table the plurality of processes, the first and second processes located in adjacent relationship to each other; and arranging along another axis of the table the instances.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
EP0314596A2
Cited
US5134560A
Cited
EP0452904A2
Cited
WO1992008184A1
Cited
US5455903A
Cited
US5481668A
Cited
US5487144A
Cited
US5630069A
Cited
US5576946A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-12-13 | 2003-06-14 | 2003-12-14 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-12-13 | 2007-06-14 | 2007-12-14 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-12-13 | 2011-06-14 | 2011-12-14 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |