US5999871A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Control method for variable level airbag inflation
Assignee: Loopback Technologies Inc
•
Filing: 1996-08-05
•
Granted: 1999-12-07
•
Expires: 2016-08-05
Abstract
Abstract An airbag with two or more inflators can be inflated in successive stages separated by a time interval, inflated simultaneously or some not inflated at all, depending on crash severity. The first stage inflation is controlled in accordance with a conventional algorithm for single stage deployment. Deployment time and velocity parameters used for the first stage are employed to determine the crash severity and the time interval of the next stage. There is no time delay in the case of a very severe crash, but for a moderately severe crash the time interval is proportional to the difference of the time or velocity and a selected minimum time or velocity value.
Inventors
- 👤 Jiyao Liu
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 19:23
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60R; B60R21/00; B60R21/01; B60R21/013
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
110 words
A method of controlling deployment of multiple stages of a vehicle inflatable restraint comprising the steps of: sensing vehicle acceleration; initiating a deployment algorithm for a first stage of the restraint when the sensed acceleration exceeds a threshold, and if such deployment algorithm determines that the first stave should be deployed: producing at least one first stage deployment parameter including a deployment time between the initiation of said deployment algorithm and the deployment of said first stage; comparing the produced first stage deployment parameter to predetermined thresholds to determine crash severity; and determining if and when to deploy a second stage of the restraint based on the determined crash severity.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
110 words
A method of controlling deployment of multiple stages of a vehicle inflatable restraint comprising the steps of: sensing vehicle acceleration; initiating a deployment algorithm for a first stage of the restraint when the sensed acceleration exceeds a threshold, and if such deployment algorithm determines that the first stave should be deployed: producing at least one first stage deployment parameter including a deployment time between the initiation of said deployment algorithm and the deployment of said first stage; comparing the produced first stage deployment parameter to predetermined thresholds to determine crash severity; and determining if and when to deploy a second stage of the restraint based on the determined crash severity.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
96 words
The method as defined in claim 1 wherein if it is determined that the second stage of the restraint should be deployed the method includes the steps of: producing a second stage deployment parameter including a secondary deployment time between the initiation of said deployment algorithm and the deployment of said second stage; comparing the produced second stage deployment parameter to predetermined thresholds to re-determine crash severity as of the time of deployment of the second stage; and determining if and when to deploy a third stage of the restraint based on the re-determined crash severity.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
65 words
The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the produced first stage deployment parameter includes the deployment time, and the method includes the steps of: establishing a deployment time threshold defining a crash severity limit; comparing the deployment time to the established threshold; and determining that the second stage of the restraint should be deployed immediately if the deployment time is below the established threshold.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
99 words
The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the produced first stage deployment parameter includes the deployment time, and the method includes the steps of: establishing first and second deployment time thresholds defining crash severity limits; comparing the deployment time to the first and second thresholds; determining that the second stage should be deployed: immediately if the deployment time is below the first thresholds and after a delay if the deployment time is between the first and second thresholds; and determining that the second stage should not be deployed if the deployment time is greater than the second threshold.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method as defined in claim 4 wherein the delay is proportional in duration to a difference between the first threshold and the deployment time.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
182 words
A method of controlling deployment of multiple stages of a vehicle inflatable restraint comprising the steps of: sensing vehicle acceleration; initiating a deployment algorithm for a first stage of the restraint when the sensed acceleration exceeds a threshold, and if such deployment algorithm determines that the first stage should be deployed: producing a first stabe deployment time T D corresponding to a time between initiation of said deployment algorithm and deployment of the first stage, and a first stage velocity V D corresponding to a change in vehicle velocity at the deployment of said first stage; establishing first and second time thresholds T A and T B with T A <T B , and first and second velocity thresholds V A and V B with V A <V B ; comparing the deployment time T D to the thresholds T A and T B , and comparing the velocity V D to the thresholds V A and V B to determine crash severity; and determining if and when to deploy a second stage of the restraint based on the determined crash severity.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
182 words
A method of controlling deployment of multiple stages of a vehicle inflatable restraint comprising the steps of: sensing vehicle acceleration; initiating a deployment algorithm for a first stage of the restraint when the sensed acceleration exceeds a threshold, and if such deployment algorithm determines that the first stage should be deployed: producing a first stabe deployment time T D corresponding to a time between initiation of said deployment algorithm and deployment of the first stage, and a first stage velocity V D corresponding to a change in vehicle velocity at the deployment of said first stage; establishing first and second time thresholds T A and T B with T A <T B , and first and second velocity thresholds V A and V B with V A <V B ; comparing the deployment time T D to the thresholds T A and T B , and comparing the velocity V D to the thresholds V A and V B to determine crash severity; and determining if and when to deploy a second stage of the restraint based on the determined crash severity.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method as defined in claim 6 wherein the step of determining if and when to deploy the second stage of the restraint includes the step of: determining to not deploy the second stage if either T D >T B or V D >V B thereby indicating that the crash is not severe.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method as defined in claim 6 wherein the step of determining if and when to deploy the second stage of the restraint includes the step of: determining to deploy the second stage immediately if T D <T A thereby indicating that the crash is very severe.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method as defined in claim 6 wherein the step of determining if and when to deploy the second stage of the restraint includes the step of: determining to deploy the second stage after a time delay if T A <T D <T B and V D <V A , thereby indicating that the crash is moderately severe.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method as defined in claim 9 wherein the time delay is proportional to T D -T A .
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method as defined in claim 9 wherein the time delay is determined by T LIM .sbsb.-- T *(T D -T A )/(T B -T A ) where T LIM .sbsb.-- T is an empirically determined maximum delay time value.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
60 words
The method as defined in claim 6 wherein the step of determining if and when to deploy the second stage of the restraint includes the step of: determining to deploy the second stage after a time delay when T A <T D <T B and V A <V D <V B , thereby indicating that the crash is moderately severe.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
62 words
The method as defined in claim 12 wherein the time delay is determined by the smaller value of T LIM .sbsb.-- T *(T D -T A )/(T B -T A ) or T LIM .sbsb. V *(V D -V A )/(V B -V A ) where T LIM .sbsb.-- T and T LIM .sbsb.-- V are empirically determined maximum delay time values.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3966224A
Cited
US3874695A
Cited
US5074583A
Cited
WO1991013784A1
Cited
DE4041049A1
Cited
US5398966A
Cited
US5375875A
Cited
US5411289A
Cited
WO1995011819A1
Cited
US5400487A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-12-06 | 2003-06-07 | 2003-12-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-12-06 | 2007-06-07 | 2007-12-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-12-06 | 2011-06-07 | 2011-12-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |