US5995212A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System and method for inspecting an optical fiber including an epoxy area surrounding the optical fiber
Assignee: Ciena Corp
•
Filing: 1998-07-28
•
Granted: 1999-11-30
•
Expires: 2018-07-28
Abstract
Abstract A system and method for inspecting an optical fiber, particularly an epoxy region of an optical fiber in a supporting structure. The inspection may use an initialization routine including determination of whether the centering between the optical fiber and the illumination source is sufficient. The meters used to determine completion of initialization may be displayed. The inspection may analyze the uniformity of the thickness of an epoxy layer between the fiber and the supporting structure. The inspection may also analyze the core and clad zones of the optical fiber for scratches and other intensity variations, referred to generically as blobs. The core zone preferably encompasses a region larger than the core alone, e.g., an area which is a multiple of the core diameter. Different criteria are established for the core and clad zones, with no discontinuities being tolerated in the core zone. Scratches may be extracted using a windowing technique. The clad zone has a two-dimensional discrimination factor for both scratches and blobs, one dimension being cumulative for a totality of the intensity variations and the other dimension being for each individual intensity variation. The effect of the illumination of the core on the discrimination may be accounted for.
Inventors
- 👤 Iqbal M. Dar
- 👤 Qiong Zhan
- 👤 Andrei Csipkes
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 16:20
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/84; G01N21/88; G01N21/95; G01N21/952
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 37
Claim 1
Independent Claim
45 words
A method for inspecting an optical fiber in a supporting structure comprising: analyzing a distribution of an entire epoxy layer between the optical fiber and the supporting structure; and determining acceptability of the optical fiber in accordance with the distribution of the entire epoxy layer.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
45 words
A method for inspecting an optical fiber in a supporting structure comprising: analyzing a distribution of an entire epoxy layer between the optical fiber and the supporting structure; and determining acceptability of the optical fiber in accordance with the distribution of the entire epoxy layer.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said analyzing includes imaging the entire epoxy layer.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the supporting structure is a ferrule and said imaging includes imaging at least a portion of the ferrule and the entire epoxy layer.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said analyzing further comprises unpolarizing an image of an annulus formed by the epoxy layer.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said analyzing includes calculating statistical parameters regarding variations in thickness of the epoxy layer around the optical fiber.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 5, wherein said statistical parameters include at least one of a half-peak width of a distribution of thicknesses of the epoxy layer, a standard deviation of the thicknesses of the epoxy layer, and a maximum gradient of thickness variations in the epoxy layer.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
48 words
A method for determining centering of an optical fiber relative to an illumination source comprising: comparing illumination levels between at least three points around a periphery of the optical fiber; and determining whether centering of the optical fiber relative to the illumination source is within a predetermined level.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
48 words
A method for determining centering of an optical fiber relative to an illumination source comprising: comparing illumination levels between at least three points around a periphery of the optical fiber; and determining whether centering of the optical fiber relative to the illumination source is within a predetermined level.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 7, further comprising, when said determining indicates that the centering is not within the predetermined level, moving the optical fiber and the illumination source relative to one another.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 7, wherein said determining includes generating a standard deviation between an average of the illumination levels at the at least three points.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
103 words
A method of analyzing scratches in a region of an optical fiber comprising: a) providing an array of pixels around a pixel of interest, with the pixel of interest being in a center of the array; b) averaging intensities of pixels surrounding the pixel of interest; c) multiplying an averaged intensity by a weighting factor to form a threshold; d) comparing an intensity of the pixel of interest to the threshold and flagging the pixel of interest when the intensity of the pixel of interest exceeds the threshold; and e) repeating said providing, averaging, multiplying and comparing for each pixel in the region.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
103 words
A method of analyzing scratches in a region of an optical fiber comprising: a) providing an array of pixels around a pixel of interest, with the pixel of interest being in a center of the array; b) averaging intensities of pixels surrounding the pixel of interest; c) multiplying an averaged intensity by a weighting factor to form a threshold; d) comparing an intensity of the pixel of interest to the threshold and flagging the pixel of interest when the intensity of the pixel of interest exceeds the threshold; and e) repeating said providing, averaging, multiplying and comparing for each pixel in the region.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 10, further comprising Hough transforming flagged pixels.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 11, further comprising ignoring features formed by Hough transformed pixels of less than a predetermined linear length.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 11, further comprising, rank filtering features formed by Hough transformed pixels.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 12, further comprising, when more than one feature remains after said ignoring, morphologically filtering features formed by Hough transformed pixels using a structuring element.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
90 words
A method of identifying a feature in a region of a fiber as a scratch comprising: capturing an image of the fiber; Hough transforming features having an intensity exceeding an average intensity in the region by a predetermined amount; thresholding Hough transformed features below a predetermined level; rank filtering Hough transformed features; morphological filtering, when more than one feature remains after said thresholding, closest features using a structuring element; and identifying any features remaining after said morphological filtering and having a length greater than a predetermined length as a scratch.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
90 words
A method of identifying a feature in a region of a fiber as a scratch comprising: capturing an image of the fiber; Hough transforming features having an intensity exceeding an average intensity in the region by a predetermined amount; thresholding Hough transformed features below a predetermined level; rank filtering Hough transformed features; morphological filtering, when more than one feature remains after said thresholding, closest features using a structuring element; and identifying any features remaining after said morphological filtering and having a length greater than a predetermined length as a scratch.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 15, further comprising computing the average intensity from an array of pixels neighboring a feature.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method of claim 15, wherein said morphological filtering includes determining a peak value of dimensions in a Hough domain for a feature closed by said structuring element, comparing the peak value to a predetermined multiple of a standard deviation of the dimensions, and ignoring features for which the peak value does not exceed the predetermined multiple of the standard deviation.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
96 words
A method of inspecting a fiber comprising: acquiring an image of the fiber; identifying defects in the fiber by intensity variations; rejecting a fiber having any defects in a core region thereof; and subjecting defects in a clad region of the fiber to a two-dimensional discrimination analysis, said two-dimensional analysis having a cumulative dimension along which a total of the defects is not to exceed a first predetermined value and an individual dimension along which each defect is not to exceed a second predetermined value, and rejecting a fiber having defects which fail in either dimension.
Claim 23
Independent Claim
96 words
A method of inspecting a fiber comprising: acquiring an image of the fiber; identifying defects in the fiber by intensity variations; rejecting a fiber having any defects in a core region thereof; and subjecting defects in a clad region of the fiber to a two-dimensional discrimination analysis, said two-dimensional analysis having a cumulative dimension along which a total of the defects is not to exceed a first predetermined value and an individual dimension along which each defect is not to exceed a second predetermined value, and rejecting a fiber having defects which fail in either dimension.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 18, wherein said identifying includes determining whether a defect is a blob or a scratch.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 19, wherein when a defect is a scratch in the clad region, the individual dimension is a length of the longest scratch and the cumulative dimension is a total number of scratches.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 19, wherein when a defect is a blob in the clad region, the individual dimension is an area of the largest blob and a cumulative dimension is a cumulative blob area.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 18, further comprising defining the core region as some multiple of a core diameter of the fiber.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 18, further comprising, when the fiber is inserted in a supporting structure, inspecting a layer between the fiber and the supporting structure.
Claim 29
Independent Claim
50 words
A method for indicating acceptability of illumination parameters of an optical fiber being illuminated to a user prior to image capture of the optical fiber comprising displaying scales with ranges for each illumination parameter and displaying an indicator for each image parameter indicating a current value of that illumination parameter.
Claim 30
Independent Claim
50 words
A method for indicating acceptability of illumination parameters of an optical fiber being illuminated to a user prior to image capture of the optical fiber comprising displaying scales with ranges for each illumination parameter and displaying an indicator for each image parameter indicating a current value of that illumination parameter.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 24, wherein the illumination parameters are for an end surface of the optical fiber.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 24, further comprising providing a visibly different region in the each of the scales indicating an acceptable region.
Claim 33
Independent Claim
42 words
A method of initializing an imaging system for a fiber being illuminated comprising: finding an illumination level of the fiber; determining whether the fiber is properly centered in the illumination; and normalizing parameters to be analyzed in accordance with the illumination level.
Claim 34
Independent Claim
42 words
A method of initializing an imaging system for a fiber being illuminated comprising: finding an illumination level of the fiber; determining whether the fiber is properly centered in the illumination; and normalizing parameters to be analyzed in accordance with the illumination level.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 27, wherein finding the illumination level includes determining an average illumination of the core and an average illumination of the cladding.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 27, further comprising determining whether contrast of the fiber is acceptable.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 27, further comprising determining whether brightness of the fiber is acceptable.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-11-29 | 2003-05-31 | 2003-11-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-11-29 | 2007-05-31 | 2007-11-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-11-29 | 2011-05-31 | 2011-11-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |