US5978737A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for hazard detection and distraction avoidance for a vehicle
Assignee: 21ST CENTURY GARAGE LLC
•
Filing: 1997-10-16
•
Granted: 1999-11-02
•
Expires: 2017-10-16
Abstract
Abstract A system for detecting hazardous conditions during operation of a vehicle. In one embodiment, the system includes a plurality of sensors that monitor a plurality of conditions and transmit condition signals each representing a measure of a condition. A plurality of rate determination circuits is coupled to the sensors and continually receives the condition signals, wherein each rate determination circuit calculates rates of change for the condition, including a baseline rate of change, and outputs a potential hazard value representing a deviation of a rate of change from the baseline rate that exceeds a predetermined threshold value. An evaluation circuit receives the potential hazard value, calculates a new potential hazard value using the potential hazard value and a rate of change for at least one associated condition and determines whether an actual hazard exists by comparing the new potential hazard value with a stored value that corresponds to the condition.
Inventors
- 👤 Stephen S. Pawlowski
- 👤 Andrew F. Glew
- 👤 George R. Hayek
- 👤 Harshvardhan P. Sharangpani
- 👤 Richard C. Calderwood
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 18:33
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S13/00; G01S13/88; G01S13/93; G01S13/931; G01S2013/9318; G01S2013/93185; G01S2013/932; G01S2013/9322; G01S2013/9325; G01S2205/00; G01S2205/001; G01S2205/002
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
146 words
A system for detecting hazardous conditions during operation of a vehicle, comprising: a plurality of sensors that monitor a plurality of conditions and transmit condition signals each representing a measure of a condition; a plurality of rate determination circuits coupled to the sensors that continually receive the condition signals, wherein each rate determination circuit calculates rates of change for the condition, including a baseline rate of change, and outputs a potential hazard value representing a deviation of a rate of change from the baseline rate that exceeds a predetermined threshold value; and an evaluation circuit that receives the potential hazard value, calculates a new potential hazard value using the potential hazard value and a rate of change for at least one associated condition and determines whether an actual hazard exists by comparing the new potential hazard value with a stored value that corresponds to the condition.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
146 words
A system for detecting hazardous conditions during operation of a vehicle, comprising: a plurality of sensors that monitor a plurality of conditions and transmit condition signals each representing a measure of a condition; a plurality of rate determination circuits coupled to the sensors that continually receive the condition signals, wherein each rate determination circuit calculates rates of change for the condition, including a baseline rate of change, and outputs a potential hazard value representing a deviation of a rate of change from the baseline rate that exceeds a predetermined threshold value; and an evaluation circuit that receives the potential hazard value, calculates a new potential hazard value using the potential hazard value and a rate of change for at least one associated condition and determines whether an actual hazard exists by comparing the new potential hazard value with a stored value that corresponds to the condition.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
49 words
The system of claim 1, further comprising: a computing device that receives an actual hazard signal from the evaluation circuit when it is determined that an actual hazard exists and generates a command; and response logic that receives the command from the computing device and takes a particular action.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
44 words
The system of claim 2, further comprising a storage element coupled to the computing device, the evaluation circuit, and the response logic that, in response to a command from the computing device, defines an action to be taken in the event of the hazard.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
25 words
The system of claim 3, wherein the information regarding the definition of the hazard includes at least one maximum rate of change of a condition.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
The system of claim 2, wherein the particular action comprises generating an audible message informing an operator of the vehicle of an impending hazard.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
21 words
The system of claim 5, wherein the audible message includes an identification of a type of hazard and a recommended response.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system of claim 2, wherein the particular action comprises disabling a vehicle radio speaker and disabling a vehicle telephone.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system of claim 7, wherein the particular action comprises controlling a vehicle braking system and a vehicle steering system.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
27 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the plurality of sensors comprises a vehicle speed sensor that senses a speed of the vehicle with respect to the ground.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
28 words
The system of claim 9, wherein the plurality of sensors comprises a distance sensor that senses a distance between the vehicle and an object exterior to the vehicle.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
26 words
The system of claim 10, wherein the plurality of sensors comprises a road condition sensor that senses a condition of the road including moistness and temperature.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
36 words
The system of claim 6, wherein the plurality of sensors comprises a position sensor that communicates with a global positioning system (GPS) satellite and determines a position of the vehicle with respect to a particular location.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
28 words
The system of claim 1, wherein the potential hazard value is generated when a rate of change deviates by a defined margin from the baseline rate of change.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
153 words
A method for detecting and responding to hazards during operation of a vehicle, comprising the steps of: sensing a plurality of conditions namely: a distance between the vehicle and an exterior object, a distance between the vehicle and a location as indicated by a signal from a global positioning system (GPS) satellite, a condition of a road surface, including a dryness of the road surface and the presence of ice on the road surface, a condition wherein a wheel of the vehicle loses traction on the road surface, an orientation of a steering mechanism of the vehicle with respect to a direction of motion of the vehicle; determining a baseline rate of change for each of the plurality of conditions; detecting a deviation from at least one of the baseline rates of change; determining whether the deviation indicates an actual hazard; and if so, taking a response action associated with the actual hazard.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
153 words
A method for detecting and responding to hazards during operation of a vehicle, comprising the steps of: sensing a plurality of conditions namely: a distance between the vehicle and an exterior object, a distance between the vehicle and a location as indicated by a signal from a global positioning system (GPS) satellite, a condition of a road surface, including a dryness of the road surface and the presence of ice on the road surface, a condition wherein a wheel of the vehicle loses traction on the road surface, an orientation of a steering mechanism of the vehicle with respect to a direction of motion of the vehicle; determining a baseline rate of change for each of the plurality of conditions; detecting a deviation from at least one of the baseline rates of change; determining whether the deviation indicates an actual hazard; and if so, taking a response action associated with the actual hazard.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 14, wherein the step of determining the baseline rate of change includes differentiating a measurement of the condition sensed over time.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 14, wherein the step of determining whether the deviation indicates an actual hazard includes considering rates of change of more than one of the plurality of conditions.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 14, further comprising the step of storing a data structure including definitions of actual hazards and responses to be taken on a storage device.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 14, further comprising the step of receiving an indication of an actual hazard and issuing a command to a response logic circuit, wherein the response logic circuit generates a plurality of signals to cause the response action to be performed.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 14, wherein the response action comprises generating an audible signal indicating a nature of the actual hazard and a recommended operator action.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 19, wherein the response action comprises controlling a steering system and a braking system of the vehicle.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 20, wherein the response action comprises disabling a vehicle radio and a vehicle telephone.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-11-01 | 2003-05-03 | 2003-11-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-11-01 | 2007-05-03 | 2007-11-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-11-01 | 2011-05-03 | 2011-11-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |