← Back to Patent Explorer
US5963939A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method and apparatus for an incremental editor technology

Assignee: Hewlett Packard Development Co LP
•
Filing: 1997-09-30
•
Granted: 1999-10-05
•
Expires: 2017-09-30
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An object-driven application tool allows a Value Added Reseller (VAR) to access a large body of publicly available information about computing devices and to identify the needs of a particular customer or end user and to select an appropriate solution of equipment, hardware, and networking products to meet the customer's needs. Moreover, the tool includes capabilities allowing a VAR to demonstrate to the end user the appropriateness of the solution, for allowing information entry in high level, abstract business-oriented vocabulary rather than a highly technical low level jargon (thus facilitating data entry of information obtained from the end user) and allowing the tool to recognize whether, for example, a slight increase in memory capacity beyond the express needs of the end user may allow a dramatic reduction in requirements for processor speed or non-volatile data storage. The latter tools allow the exemplary embodiment of the present invention to suggest superior solutions over and beyond the express needs of the end user. Selection of a particular solution is generally decoupled from the needs of the end user, which are stored in a separate database; thereafter, as new equipment to obtain on-line information relating to new products and services. Information in the database also includes retrofit information, so that new products can be installed into existing networks.

Inventors

  • 👤 Paul H. McCann
  • 👤 Gary L. Alose
  • 👤 Javier E. Chavez
  • 👤 Scott M. Dawson
  • 👤 Robert S. Brayton
  • 👤 Paul E. Hiles

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-02 13:03
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q30/00; G06Q30/06; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S707/00; Y10S707/99931; Y10S707/99933; Y10S707/99934

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim 95 words
A computer implemented system for selecting products, comprising: a database with at least one class of products having physical performance parameters; a calibration table coupled to the database, the calibration table providing a translation between physical and relative, logical performance parameters such that a product with a particular physical performance parameter is selected responsive to specification of the relative, logical performance curve parameters; and a user interface for specifying the class of product and the relative, logical performance parameter for the class of product, and for displaying a product with the corresponding physical performance parameter.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 95 words
A computer implemented system for selecting products, comprising: a database with at least one class of products having physical performance parameters; a calibration table coupled to the database, the calibration table providing a translation between physical and relative, logical performance parameters such that a product with a particular physical performance parameter is selected responsive to specification of the relative, logical performance curve parameters; and a user interface for specifying the class of product and the relative, logical performance parameter for the class of product, and for displaying a product with the corresponding physical performance parameter.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 32 words
The computer implemented system of claim 1, wherein: the database resides within a memory within a server; and the user interface resides within a subsystem coupled to the server over a network.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 13 words
The computer implemented system of claim 2, wherein the network is the Internet.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 34 words
The computer implemented system of claim 1, wherein the database and the user interface reside on the same stand-alone computer, such that the database and the user interface are directly accessible by a processor.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 12 words
The computer implemented system of claim 1, wherein: the products include computers.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 14 words
The computer implemented system of claim 1, wherein: the products include computer network components.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 13 words
The computer implemented system of claim 1, wherein: the products include computer peripherals.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 18 words
The computer implemented system of claim 1, wherein: the products include computers, computer network components, and computer peripherals.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 12 words
The computer system of claim 1, wherein: the user interface includes buttons.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 24 words
The computer implemented system of claim 1, wherein: the user interface allows a user to enter the increment and decrement inputs via a keyboard.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 32 words
The system of claim 1, wherein: the particular relative, logical parameter is within a sortable range of values, each value in the range of values translating to a distinct physical performance parameter.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 20 words
The system of claim 1 wherein: each physical performance parameter translates to a distinct subset of the class of products.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 66 words
In a computer system having a database with at least one class of products having physical performance parameters, a method for selecting a subset of the class of products, the method comprising the steps of: receiving a relative, logical performance parameter; translating the relative, logical performance parameter to a physical performance parameter; and determining a subset of the class of products having the physical performance parameter.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 66 words
In a computer system having a database with at least one class of products having physical performance parameters, a method for selecting a subset of the class of products, the method comprising the steps of: receiving a relative, logical performance parameter; translating the relative, logical performance parameter to a physical performance parameter; and determining a subset of the class of products having the physical performance parameter.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 62 words
The method of claim 13, wherein the step of translating includes a step of: accessing a calibration table coupled to the database; and the calibration table providing a translation between physical performance parameters and the relative, logical performance parameters such that a set of products with a particular physical performance parameter is selected responsive to specification of the relative logical performance parameter.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US5806060A Cited
US5859969A Cited
US5650994A Cited
US5832473A Cited
US5784539A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2002-10-04 2003-04-05 2003-10-05 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2006-10-04 2007-04-05 2007-10-05 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2010-10-04 2011-04-05 2011-10-05 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag