US5956708A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Integration of link generation, cross-author user navigation, and reuse identification in authoring process
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1997-03-06
•
Granted: 1999-09-21
•
Expires: 2017-03-06
Abstract
Abstract A process for professional authoring of information about structured domains (i.e., not including fiction) by which authors, as an integral part of the authoring process, provide the data needed to (1) enable intelligent user navigation between the work of different authors without the need for predefined links; (2) enable searches for information based on user context; and (3) identify reuse candidates before information is written and, therefore, minimize duplication. Authors develop concept maps to reflect the structure of the domain rather than the structure of the documentation; define the user context to which a concept map applies; resolve topic intersections between concept maps; define query attributes for articles to be developed; and resolve article intersections identified by means of intersecting query attributes. Computer programs support concept map development, the identification and analysis of topic and article intersections, and association of the data for exploitation in a user interface.
Inventors
- 👤 Denise Y. Dyko
- 👤 Christopher J. Hastings
- 👤 Richard Sobiesiak
- 👤 Ronald A. Wendt
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 03:00
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F16/00; G06F16/90; G06F16/93; G06F16/94; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S707/00; Y10S707/99931; Y10S707/99933; Y10S707/99934; Y10S707/99935; Y10S707/99939
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
80 words
A computer-implemented method of facilitating reuse of previously created articles, comprising: storing attribute data specifying a topic and information type for each of a plurality of previously created articles; receiving attribute data from an author specifying a topic and information type for a contemplated article; and comparing the received attribute data with the stored attribute data to identify previously created articles having the same topic and information type as said contemplated article; wherein said user context specifies a task group.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
80 words
A computer-implemented method of facilitating reuse of previously created articles, comprising: storing attribute data specifying a topic and information type for each of a plurality of previously created articles; receiving attribute data from an author specifying a topic and information type for a contemplated article; and comparing the received attribute data with the stored attribute data to identify previously created articles having the same topic and information type as said contemplated article; wherein said user context specifies a task group.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
103 words
A computer-implemented method of facilitating reuse of previously created articles, comprising: storing attribute data specifying topic and information type for each of a plurality of previously created articles; receiving attribute data from an author specifying a topic and information type for a contemplated article; and comparing the received attribute data with the stored attribute data to identify previously created articles having the same topic and information type as said contemplated article; and receiving input from said author specifying whether to reuse any of said previously created articles that have been identified as having the same topic and information type as said contemplated article.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
103 words
A computer-implemented method of facilitating reuse of previously created articles, comprising: storing attribute data specifying topic and information type for each of a plurality of previously created articles; receiving attribute data from an author specifying a topic and information type for a contemplated article; and comparing the received attribute data with the stored attribute data to identify previously created articles having the same topic and information type as said contemplated article; and receiving input from said author specifying whether to reuse any of said previously created articles that have been identified as having the same topic and information type as said contemplated article.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of: in response to an input from said author specifying reuse of a previously created article, associating the attribute data received from said author with said previously created article.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
99 words
A computer-implemented method of facilitating reuse of previously created articles, comprising the steps of: storing attribute data specifying a set of query attributes for each of a plurality of previously created articles; receiving attribute data from an author specifying a set of query attributes for a contemplated article; comparing the received attribute data with the stored attribute data to identify previously created articles having query attributes that intersect with those of said contemplated article; and receiving input from said author specifying whether to reuse any of said previously created articles that have been identified as having intersecting query attributes.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
99 words
A computer-implemented method of facilitating reuse of previously created articles, comprising the steps of: storing attribute data specifying a set of query attributes for each of a plurality of previously created articles; receiving attribute data from an author specifying a set of query attributes for a contemplated article; comparing the received attribute data with the stored attribute data to identify previously created articles having query attributes that intersect with those of said contemplated article; and receiving input from said author specifying whether to reuse any of said previously created articles that have been identified as having intersecting query attributes.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of: in response to an input from said author specifying reuse of a previously created article, associating the set of query attributes received from said author with said previously created article.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of: in response to an input from said author specifying no reuse of a previously created article, assigning a unique identifier to said contemplated article.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the received query attributes include topic name.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the received query attributes include information type.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
26 words
A program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform the method steps of claim 4.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said stored attribute data and said received attribute data are selected from a predefined set of attribute data.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
90 words
A computer-implemented method of authoring information about a structured domain, comprising: storing one or more concept maps, each of which identifies topics documented by a set of articles within a particular domain and relationships between said topics; and storing a set of context filters for each of said concept maps that specify user attributes of said map; receiving input from an author defining a proposed new topic; comparing said input with existing topics identified by said concept maps to determine whether said proposed new topic may duplicate an existing topic.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
90 words
A computer-implemented method of authoring information about a structured domain, comprising: storing one or more concept maps, each of which identifies topics documented by a set of articles within a particular domain and relationships between said topics; and storing a set of context filters for each of said concept maps that specify user attributes of said map; receiving input from an author defining a proposed new topic; comparing said input with existing topics identified by said concept maps to determine whether said proposed new topic may duplicate an existing topic.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
103 words
A computer-implemented system for facilitating reuse of previously created articles, comprising: means for storing attribute data specifying a set of query attributes for each of a plurality of previously created articles; means for receiving attribute data from an author specifying a set of query attributes for a contemplated article; means for comparing the received attribute data with the stored attribute data to identify previously created articles having query attributes that intersect with those of said contemplated article; and means receiving input from said author specifying whether to reuse any of said previously created articles that have been identified as having intersecting query attributes.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
103 words
A computer-implemented system for facilitating reuse of previously created articles, comprising: means for storing attribute data specifying a set of query attributes for each of a plurality of previously created articles; means for receiving attribute data from an author specifying a set of query attributes for a contemplated article; means for comparing the received attribute data with the stored attribute data to identify previously created articles having query attributes that intersect with those of said contemplated article; and means receiving input from said author specifying whether to reuse any of said previously created articles that have been identified as having intersecting query attributes.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
25 words
The computer-implemented system of claim 12 wherein said stored attribute data and said received attribute data are selected from a predefined set of attribute data.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4502766A
Cited
US4559572A
Cited
US4905163A
Cited
US5367621A
Cited
US5677835A
Cited
US5594857A
Cited
US5506937A
Cited
US5768578A
Cited
US5597312A
Cited
US5655130A
Cited
US5873107A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-09-20 | 2003-03-22 | 2003-09-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-09-20 | 2007-03-22 | 2007-09-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-09-20 | 2011-03-22 | 2011-09-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |