US5936386A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of linearizing the performance of switched reluctance generators
Assignee: Sundstrand Corp
•
Filing: 1997-09-10
•
Granted: 1999-08-10
•
Expires: 2017-09-10
Abstract
Abstract A method of linearizing the output performance of a switched reluctance generator, comprises the steps of exciting the switched reluctance generator during a first phase of operation at a turn-on angle which need not be accurately calculated to produce the desired excitation current. Next, during a second phase of commutation, the switched reluctance generator is freewheeled when a phase current of the switched reluctance generator exceeds a first calculated current level. This freewheeling continues until the phase current of the switched reluctance generator exceeds a second calculated current level, at which point the switched reluctance generator enters the generation phase of its commutation cycle. The linearization of the performance occurs because the first and second calculated current levels are calculated as a function of energy converted per electrical cycle. This function of energy converted per electrical cycle is calculated using an inductance of the switched reluctance generator in an aligned position and an inductance of the switched reluctance generator in an unaligned position. The shape of a graph of the flux linkage versus the phase current is controlled through the selection of the first and second calculated current levels which increases efficiency while linearizing the performance of the switched reluctance generator. The area enclosed by this graph is equal to the energy converted per electrical cycle.
Inventors
- 👤 William S. Heglund
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 09:38
CPC Classifications
H; H02; H02P; H02P9/00; H02P9/40; H02P25/00; H02P25/02; H02P25/08; H02P25/092
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
94 words
A method of linearizing the output performance of a switched reluctance generator, comprising the steps of: exciting the switched reluctance generator at a turn-on angle; freewheeling the switched reluctance generator at a second angle when a phase current of the switched reluctance generator exceeds a first calculated current level; generating the switched reluctance generator at a third angle when said phase current of the switched reluctance generator exceeds a second calculated current level; and wherein said first and said second calculated current levels are calculated as a function of energy converted per electrical cycle.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
94 words
A method of linearizing the output performance of a switched reluctance generator, comprising the steps of: exciting the switched reluctance generator at a turn-on angle; freewheeling the switched reluctance generator at a second angle when a phase current of the switched reluctance generator exceeds a first calculated current level; generating the switched reluctance generator at a third angle when said phase current of the switched reluctance generator exceeds a second calculated current level; and wherein said first and said second calculated current levels are calculated as a function of energy converted per electrical cycle.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of generating the switched reluctance generator at a turn-off angle.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said function of energy converted per electrical cycle is calculated using a first inductance of the switched reluctance generator in an aligned position and a second inductance of the switched reluctance generator in an unaligned position.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 3, wherein said turn-on angle is unrelated to said first and said second calculated current levels.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 1, wherein during said exciting step said phase current of the switched reluctance generator increases along a flux linkage versus current curve having a slope approximately equal to an aligned inductance of the switched reluctance generator.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 5, wherein during said freewheeling step said phase current of the switched reluctance generator increases while a flux linkage of the switched reluctance generator remains relatively constant.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 6, wherein during said generating step said phase current of the switched reluctance generator remains relatively constant while said flux linkage droops.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method of claim 7, wherein during said generating step said flux linkage droops until it reaches a given value determined by a flux linkage versus current curve determined by an unaligned inductance of the switched reluctance generator, at which point said phase current of the switched reluctance generator decreases along a flux linkage versus current curve having a slope approximately equal to an unaligned inductance of the switched reluctance generator.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
148 words
A method of linearizing the performance of a switched reluctance generator, comprising the steps of: exciting the switched reluctance generator with phase current which follows a flux linkage versus current curve having a slope approximately equal to an aligned inductance of the switched reluctance generator; freewheeling the switched reluctance generator with increasing phase current while maintaining a flux linkage of the switched reluctance generator relatively constant; and generating the switched reluctance generator with relatively constant phase current while said flux linkage droops during a first phase of generation until said flux linkage droops to a predetermined value determined by a flux linkage versus current curve governed by an unaligned inductance of the switched reluctance generator, at which point said phase current of the switched reluctance generator decreases along a flux linkage versus current curve having a slope approximately equal to an unaligned inductance of the switched reluctance generator.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
148 words
A method of linearizing the performance of a switched reluctance generator, comprising the steps of: exciting the switched reluctance generator with phase current which follows a flux linkage versus current curve having a slope approximately equal to an aligned inductance of the switched reluctance generator; freewheeling the switched reluctance generator with increasing phase current while maintaining a flux linkage of the switched reluctance generator relatively constant; and generating the switched reluctance generator with relatively constant phase current while said flux linkage droops during a first phase of generation until said flux linkage droops to a predetermined value determined by a flux linkage versus current curve governed by an unaligned inductance of the switched reluctance generator, at which point said phase current of the switched reluctance generator decreases along a flux linkage versus current curve having a slope approximately equal to an unaligned inductance of the switched reluctance generator.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
134 words
A method of linearizing the performance of a switched reluctance generator, comprising the steps of: monitoring a bus voltage, a speed of the switched reluctance generator, and a number of electrical cycles per revolution of the switched reluctance generator; comparing said bus voltage with a predetermined voltage command to generate a voltage error signal; calculating a dc current command signal from said voltage error signal; calculating energy per cycle of the switched reluctance generator; calculating a first calculated current level from said energy per cycle and a second calculated current level from said first calculated current level; exciting the switched reluctance generator until a phase current exceeds said first calculated current level; freewheeling the switched reluctance generator until said phase current exceeds said second calculated current level; and thereafter generating the switched reluctance generator.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
134 words
A method of linearizing the performance of a switched reluctance generator, comprising the steps of: monitoring a bus voltage, a speed of the switched reluctance generator, and a number of electrical cycles per revolution of the switched reluctance generator; comparing said bus voltage with a predetermined voltage command to generate a voltage error signal; calculating a dc current command signal from said voltage error signal; calculating energy per cycle of the switched reluctance generator; calculating a first calculated current level from said energy per cycle and a second calculated current level from said first calculated current level; exciting the switched reluctance generator until a phase current exceeds said first calculated current level; freewheeling the switched reluctance generator until said phase current exceeds said second calculated current level; and thereafter generating the switched reluctance generator.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3560820A
Cited
US4143308A
Cited
US4230976A
Cited
US4896088A
Cited
US5166591A
Cited
US5204604A
Cited
US5289107A
Cited
US5327069A
Cited
US5545964A
Cited
US5381081A
Cited
US5404091A
Cited
US5530333A
Cited
US5705918A
Cited
US5726560A
Cited
US5780997A
Cited
US5850133A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2002-08-09 | 2003-02-08 | 2003-08-10 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2006-08-09 | 2007-02-08 | 2007-08-10 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2010-08-09 | 2011-02-08 | 2011-08-10 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |