US5838815A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and system to enhance robust identification of abnormal regions in radiographs
Assignee: University of Pittsburgh
•
Filing: 1996-02-22
•
Granted: 1998-11-17
•
Expires: 2016-02-22
Abstract
Abstract A method and apparatus for detecting abnormal regions in living tissue depicted in a digital radiograph includes identifying suspected abnormal regions depicted in the radiograph and then, for each identified suspected abnormal region, extracting multiple topographic layers of the region from the digital radiograph; determining features of the region in each of the layers; and applying inter-layer multivariate non-linear criteria to the features to determine whether the suspected abnormal region is to be classified as an abnormal region. The distribution of digital values in the digitized radiograph is modified and a probabalistic determination is made as to whether suspected abnormal regions are actually abnormal from multiple analyses. An image is processed using at least two partially correlated detection schemes to produce at least two corresponding result sets of potentially abnormal regions; and the results of the detection schemes are combined using logical "AND" or logical "OR" combining rules to detect abnormal regions in the radiograph.
Inventors
- 👤 David Gur
- 👤 Bin Zheng
- 👤 Yuan-Hsiang Chang
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 22:15
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/0002; G06T7/0012; G06V; G06V20/00; G06V20/60; G06V20/69
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 26
Claim 1
Independent Claim
80 words
A method of detecting an abnormal region in living tissue depicted in a digital radiograph, the method comprising: identifying a suspected abnormal region depicted in the radiograph; extracting multiple topographic layers of the suspected abnormal region from the digital radiograph, the multiple topographic layers being extracted from the same radiograph; determining features of the region in each of said layers; and applying an inter-layer multivariate criterion to said features to determine whether said suspected abnormal region is an abnormal region.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
80 words
A method of detecting an abnormal region in living tissue depicted in a digital radiograph, the method comprising: identifying a suspected abnormal region depicted in the radiograph; extracting multiple topographic layers of the suspected abnormal region from the digital radiograph, the multiple topographic layers being extracted from the same radiograph; determining features of the region in each of said layers; and applying an inter-layer multivariate criterion to said features to determine whether said suspected abnormal region is an abnormal region.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
11 words
A method as in claim 1, wherein said criterion is non-linear.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
64 words
A method as in claim 1, wherein said features of the region include at least one of: the size of the region, the shape of the region, the longest axis of the region; the contrast of the region; the standard deviation of the region; the skewness of the region; the size growth ratio of the region; and the central position shift of the region.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
209 words
A method as in claim 3, wherein said criterion relates to at least one of: (a) the contrast and the standard deviation in a third layer; (b) the shape factor and longest axis in the third layer; (c) the size and the contrast in a first layer; (d) the growth ratio between the first layer and a second layer compared to the growth ratio between the second and third layers; (e) the shape factor in the second layer and the central position shift between the first and second layers; (f) the contrast in the first layer and central position shift between the first and second layer; (g) the growth ratio between the second and third layers compared to the skewness in the second layer; (h) the growth ratio between the second and third layers compared to the standard deviation in the first layer; (i) the shape factor in the second layer compared to the skewness in the third layer; (j) the shape factor in the second layer compared to the shape factor in the third layer; (k) the standard deviation in the first layer compared to the longest axis in the second layer; and (l) the contrast in the first layer compared to the skewness in the second layer.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
60 words
A method as in claim 2, wherein said features of the region include: the size of the region, the shape of the region, the longest axis of the region; the contrast of the region; the standard deviation of the region; the skewness of the region; the size growth ratio of the region; and the central position shift of the region.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
205 words
A method as in claim 5, wherein said criterion relates to: (a) the contrast and the standard deviation in a third layer; (b) the shape factor and longest axis in the third layer; (c) the size and the contrast in a first layer; (d) the growth ratio between the first layer and a second layer compared to the growth ratio between the second and third layers; (e) the shape factor in the second layer and the central position shift between the first and second layers; (f) the contrast in the first layer and central position shift between the first and second layer; (g) the growth ratio between the second and third layers compared to the skewness in the second layer; (h) the growth ratio between the second and third layers compared to the standard deviation in the first layer; (i) the shape factor in the second layer compared to the skewness in the third layer; (j) the shape factor in the second layer compared to the shape factor in the third layer; (k) the standard deviation in the first layer compared to the longest axis in the second layer; and (l) the contrast in the first layer compared to the skewness in the second layer.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
55 words
A method as in claim 3, wherein said criterion relates to at least one of: the contrast and the standard deviation in a third layer; the shape factor in a second layer compared to the skewness in the third layer; and the contrast in a first layer compared to the skewness in the second layer.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
131 words
A method as in claim 1, wherein said criterion relates to at least one of: contrast in one of said layers and central position shift between said one of said layers and another of said layers; growth ratio between two of said layers compared to skewness in one of said two of said layers; growth ratio between two of said layers compared to standard deviation in one of said layers; shape factor in one of said layers compared to skewness in another of said layers; shape factor in one of said layers compared to shape factor in another of said layers; standard deviation in one of said layers compared to longest axis in another of said layers; and contrast in one of said layers compared to skewness another of said layers.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
84 words
A method of detecting abnormal regions in living tissue depicted in a digital radiograph, the method comprising: identifying suspected abnormal regions depicted in the radiograph; for each identified suspected abnormal region, (a) extracting multiple topographic layers of the region from the digital radiograph, the multiple topographic layers being extracted from the same radiograph; (b) determining features of the region in each of said layers; and (c) applying inter-layer multivariate criteria to said features to determine whether said suspected abnormal region is an abnormal region.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
84 words
A method of detecting abnormal regions in living tissue depicted in a digital radiograph, the method comprising: identifying suspected abnormal regions depicted in the radiograph; for each identified suspected abnormal region, (a) extracting multiple topographic layers of the region from the digital radiograph, the multiple topographic layers being extracted from the same radiograph; (b) determining features of the region in each of said layers; and (c) applying inter-layer multivariate criteria to said features to determine whether said suspected abnormal region is an abnormal region.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
98 words
An apparatus for detecting abnormal regions in living tissue depicted in a digital radiograph, the apparatus comprising: means for identifying suspected abnormal regions depicted in the radiograph; means for extracting multiple topographic layers of the region from the digital radiograph for each suspected abnormal region identified by the means for identifying, the multiple topographic layers all being extracted from the same radiograph; means for determining features in each of said layers extracted by the means for extracting; and means for applying inter-layer multivariate criteria to said features to determine whether said suspected abnormal region is an abnormal region.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
98 words
An apparatus for detecting abnormal regions in living tissue depicted in a digital radiograph, the apparatus comprising: means for identifying suspected abnormal regions depicted in the radiograph; means for extracting multiple topographic layers of the region from the digital radiograph for each suspected abnormal region identified by the means for identifying, the multiple topographic layers all being extracted from the same radiograph; means for determining features in each of said layers extracted by the means for extracting; and means for applying inter-layer multivariate criteria to said features to determine whether said suspected abnormal region is an abnormal region.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
20 words
An apparatus as in claim 10, wherein said means for applying inter-layer multivariate criteria comprises means for applying non-linear criteria.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
64 words
An apparatus as in claim 10, wherein said features of the region include at least one of: the size of the region, the shape of the region, the longest axis of the region; the contrast of the region; the standard deviation of the region; the skewness of the region; the size growth ratio of the region; and the central position shift of the region.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
207 words
An apparatus as in claim 10, wherein said criteria relate to at least one of: (a) the contrast and the standard deviation in a third layer; (b) the shape factor and longest axis in the third layer; (c) the size and the contrast in a first layer; (d) the growth ratio between the first layer and a second layer compared to the growth ratio between the second and third layers; (e) the shape factor in the second layer and the central position shift between first and second layer; (f) the contrast in the first layer and central position shift between the first and second layer; (g) the growth ratio between the second and third layers compared to the skewness in the second layer; (h) the growth ratio between the second and third layers compared to standard deviation in the first layer; (i) the shape factor in the second layer compared to the skewness in the third layer; (j) the shape factor in the second layer compared to the shape factor in the third layer; (k) the standard deviation in the first layer compared to the longest axis in the second layer; and (l) the contrast in the first layer compared to the skewness in the second layer.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
131 words
An apparatus as in claim 10, wherein said criteria relate to at least one of: contrast in one of said layers and central position shift between said one of said layers and another of said layers; growth ratio between two of said layers compared to skewness in one of said two of said layers; growth ratio between two of said layers compared to standard deviation in one of said layers; shape factor in one of said layers compared to skewness in another of said layers; shape factor in one of said layers compared to shape factor in another of said layers; standard deviation in one of said layers compared to longest axis in another of said layers; and contrast in one of said layers compared to skewness another of said layers.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein the radiograph is a mammogram and wherein the abnormal region depicts a mass or clustered microcalcifications.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method as in claim 9 wherein the radiograph is a mammogram and wherein the abnormal regions depict masses or clustered microcalcifications.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
22 words
An apparatus as in claim 10 wherein the radiograph is a mammogram and wherein the abnormal regions depict masses or clustered microcalcifications.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein the radiograph is produced from computed tomography of the liver and wherein the abnormal region depicts a mass.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method as in claim 9 wherein the radiograph is produced from computed tomography of the liver and wherein the abnormal regions depict masses.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
24 words
An apparatus as in claim 10 wherein the radiograph is produced from computed tomography of the liver and wherein the abnormal regions depict masses.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein the radiograph is a chest x-ray and wherein the abnormal region depicts a nodule.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method as in claim 9 wherein the radiograph is a chest x-ray and wherein the abnormal regions depict nodules.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
20 words
An apparatus as in claim 10 wherein the radiograph is a chest x-ray and wherein the abnormal regions depict nodules.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4515165A
Cited
US4907156A
Cited
US4839807A
Cited
US4851984A
Cited
US5133020A
Cited
US5212637A
Cited
US5289374A
Cited
US5343390A
Cited
US5627907A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-11-16 | 2002-05-18 | 2002-11-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-11-16 | 2006-05-18 | 2006-11-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-11-16 | 2010-05-18 | 2010-11-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |