← Back to Patent Explorer
US5832137A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Show-through correction for two-sided documents

Assignee: Xerox Corp
•
Filing: 1997-05-01
•
Granted: 1998-11-03
•
Expires: 2017-05-01
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An image processing method for mitigating the effects of show-through in scanning a duplexed document in a duplex scanning system, including: deriving a scanned first side image P from a first side image A of a duplexed document and a scanned second side image Q from a second side image B of the duplexed document, at least the first side image P including a component thereof attributable to show-through from the second side of the document, and storing images P and Q; from second side image Q, generating a representation thereof corresponding to the show-through contribution to first side image P; processing image P to remove show-through as a function of the representation Q, thereby deriving correct image A.

Inventors

  • 👤 Keith T. Knox

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 13:32
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04N; H04N1/00; H04N1/40; H04N1/409; H04N1/4095

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 26
Claim 1
Independent Claim 114 words
An image processing method for mitigating the effects of show-through in scanning a duplexed document comprising: deriving a scanned first side image P from a first side image A of a duplexed document and a scanned second side image Q from a second side image B of the duplexed document, at least the first side image P including a component thereof attributable to show-through from the second side of the document, and storing images P and Q; from second side image Q, generating a representation thereof corresponding to the show-through contribution to first side image P; processing image P to remove show-through as a function of the representation Q, thereby deriving correct image A.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 114 words
An image processing method for mitigating the effects of show-through in scanning a duplexed document comprising: deriving a scanned first side image P from a first side image A of a duplexed document and a scanned second side image Q from a second side image B of the duplexed document, at least the first side image P including a component thereof attributable to show-through from the second side of the document, and storing images P and Q; from second side image Q, generating a representation thereof corresponding to the show-through contribution to first side image P; processing image P to remove show-through as a function of the representation Q, thereby deriving correct image A.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 19 words
The image processing method of claim 1, wherein the representation of Q is generated by reverse reading image Q.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 41 words
The image processing method of claim 1, wherein the representation of Q is generated by translating image Q in terms of spatial coordinates to bring each pixel of image Q to a position corresponding to the contribution thereof to image P.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 49 words
The image processing method of claim 1, wherein the representation of Q is generated by: reverse reading image Q; and translating reverse read image Q in terms of spatial coordinates required to bring each pixel of image Q to a position corresponding to the contribution thereof to image P.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 33 words
The image processing method described in claim 1, wherein said image P is additionally a function of a show through coefficient f, indicating the intensity of the show through portion of the image.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 16 words
The image processing method of claim 5, wherein the processing function is given by: A(x)=(P(x)-(f xQ(-x)))/(1-f).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 118 words
An image processing arrangement for mitigating the effects of show-through in scanning a duplexed document, comprising: a scanner deriving a scanned first side image P from a first side image A of a duplexed document and a scanned second side image Q from a second side image B of the duplexed document, at least the first side image P including a component thereof attributable to show-through from the second side of the document, and storing images P and Q; an image manipulation circuit generating a representation of Q corresponding to the show-through contribution to first side image P; means for processing image P to remove show-through as a function of the representation Q, thereby deriving correct image A.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 118 words
An image processing arrangement for mitigating the effects of show-through in scanning a duplexed document, comprising: a scanner deriving a scanned first side image P from a first side image A of a duplexed document and a scanned second side image Q from a second side image B of the duplexed document, at least the first side image P including a component thereof attributable to show-through from the second side of the document, and storing images P and Q; an image manipulation circuit generating a representation of Q corresponding to the show-through contribution to first side image P; means for processing image P to remove show-through as a function of the representation Q, thereby deriving correct image A.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 25 words
The image processing arrangement of claim 7, wherein said image manipulation circuit for generating the representation of Q includes means for reverse reading image Q.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 47 words
The image processing method arrangement of claim 7, wherein the image manipulation circuit generating a representation of Q included means for translating image Q in terms of spatial coordinates to bring each pixel of image Q to a position corresponding to the contribution thereof to image P.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 56 words
The image processing arrangement of claim 7, wherein the image manipulation circuit generating a representation of Q comprises: means for reverse reading image Q; and means for translating reverse read image Q in terms of spatial coordinates required to bring each pixel of image Q to a position corresponding to the contribution thereof to image P.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 37 words
The image processing arrangement described in claim 7, wherein means for processing image P additionally takes into account a function of a show through coefficient f, indicating the intensity of the show through portion of the image.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 21 words
The image processing arrangement of claim 11, wherein the processing means operates in accordance with the function given by: A(x)=(P(x)-(f xQ(-x)))/(1-f).
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 149 words
An image processing method for mitigation the effects of show-through in scanning duplexed documents in scanning systems, comprising: scanning a first side image A of a document to acquire an image P including show-through effects of a second side image B; scanning the second side image B of a document to acquire an image Q including the show-through effects of a first side image A; processing image P for removal of show-through effects, by: generating a representation of Q corresponding to the show-through contribution to first side image P, processing image P to remove show-through as a function of the representation Q, thereby deriving correct image A; processing image Q for removal of show-through effects, by: generating a representation of P corresponding to the show-through contribution to second side image Q, processing image Q to remove show-through as a function of the representation P, thereby deriving correct image B.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 149 words
An image processing method for mitigation the effects of show-through in scanning duplexed documents in scanning systems, comprising: scanning a first side image A of a document to acquire an image P including show-through effects of a second side image B; scanning the second side image B of a document to acquire an image Q including the show-through effects of a first side image A; processing image P for removal of show-through effects, by: generating a representation of Q corresponding to the show-through contribution to first side image P, processing image P to remove show-through as a function of the representation Q, thereby deriving correct image A; processing image Q for removal of show-through effects, by: generating a representation of P corresponding to the show-through contribution to second side image Q, processing image Q to remove show-through as a function of the representation P, thereby deriving correct image B.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 19 words
The image processing method of claim 13, wherein the representation of Q is generated by reverse reading image Q.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 19 words
The image processing method of claim 13, wherein the representation of P is generated by reverse reading image P.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 41 words
The image processing method of claim 13, wherein the representation of Q is generated by translating image Q in terms of spatial coordinates to bring each pixel of image Q to a position corresponding to the contribution thereof to image P.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 41 words
The image processing method of claim 13, wherein the representation of P is generated by translating image P in terms of spatial coordinates to bring each pixel of image P to a position corresponding to the contribution thereof to image Q.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 49 words
The image processing method of claim 13, wherein the representation of Q is generated by: reverse reading image Q; and translating reverse read image Q in terms of spatial coordinates required to bring each pixel of image Q to a position corresponding to the contribution thereof to image P.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 49 words
The image processing method of claim 13, wherein the representation of P is generated by: reverse reading image P; and translating reverse read image P in terms of spatial coordinates required to bring each pixel of image P to a position corresponding to the contribution thereof to image Q.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 16 words
The image processing method of claim 13, wherein the processing function is given by: A(x)=(P(x)-(f xQ(-x)))/(1-f).
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 16 words
The image processing method of claim 13, wherein the processing function is given by: B(x)=(Q(x)-(f xP(-x)))/(1-f).
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 133 words
A document printing system, including an arrangement for mitigation of the effects of show-through in the reproduction of duplexed documents scanned from scanning systems, comprising: a scanner deriving a scanned first side image P from a first side image A of a duplexed document and a scanned second side image Q from a second side image B of the duplexed document, at least the first side image P including a component thereof attributable to show-through from the second side of the document, and storing images P and Q; an image manipulation circuit generating a representation of Q corresponding to the show-through contribution to first side image P; means for processing image P to remove show-through as a function of the representation Q, thereby deriving correct image A; printing P, with show-through effects mitigated.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 133 words
A document printing system, including an arrangement for mitigation of the effects of show-through in the reproduction of duplexed documents scanned from scanning systems, comprising: a scanner deriving a scanned first side image P from a first side image A of a duplexed document and a scanned second side image Q from a second side image B of the duplexed document, at least the first side image P including a component thereof attributable to show-through from the second side of the document, and storing images P and Q; an image manipulation circuit generating a representation of Q corresponding to the show-through contribution to first side image P; means for processing image P to remove show-through as a function of the representation Q, thereby deriving correct image A; printing P, with show-through effects mitigated.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US5646744A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2001-11-02 2002-05-04 2002-11-03 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2005-11-02 2006-05-04 2006-11-03 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2009-11-02 2010-05-04 2010-11-03 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag