US5802114A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for modulation differentiation
Assignee: Ericsson Inc
•
Filing: 1997-06-04
•
Granted: 1998-09-01
•
Expires: 2017-06-04
Abstract
Abstract To differentiate between different types of modulation, a fast RSSI detector performs a RSSI measurement on a received signal. The output of the RSSI detector is sampled over a sampling window and generates sampled values. A processor calculates absolute values of piecewise first derivatives of the sampled values and sums the result to create a summation constant. A modulation detector determines the type of modulation based on the value of the summation constant and an RSSI compensation calculates a compensation factor to correct the RSSI measurement.
Inventors
- 👤 Christopher Koszarsky
- 👤 John Northcutt
- 👤 Michael Nowak
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 08:21
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04L; H04L27/00; H04L27/0012; H04B; H04B17/00; H04B17/30; H04B17/309; H04B17/318
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
117 words
An apparatus for distinguishing between received signal modulation types comprising: a received signal strength indicator detector for generating a received signal strength indicator waveform whose value is logarithmically proportional to the amplitude of a received signal; a sampler for sampling the generated received signal strength indicator waveform, the sampler sampling the received signal strength indicator waveform over a sampling window and generating sampled values; a processor for calculating absolute values of piecewise first derivatives of the generated sampled values and further for calculating a summation constant equal to a sum of the absolute values of the piecewise first derivatives; and a modulation detector for determining the type of modulation from the value of the calculated summation constant.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
117 words
An apparatus for distinguishing between received signal modulation types comprising: a received signal strength indicator detector for generating a received signal strength indicator waveform whose value is logarithmically proportional to the amplitude of a received signal; a sampler for sampling the generated received signal strength indicator waveform, the sampler sampling the received signal strength indicator waveform over a sampling window and generating sampled values; a processor for calculating absolute values of piecewise first derivatives of the generated sampled values and further for calculating a summation constant equal to a sum of the absolute values of the piecewise first derivatives; and a modulation detector for determining the type of modulation from the value of the calculated summation constant.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
39 words
The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the received signal strength indicator detector generates a received signal strength indicator waveform Vd according to an expression Vd=(k) (Vi) where k is a proportionately constant and Vi is the received signal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
23 words
The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the sampler samples at a rate of one thousand nine hundred forty four samples per second.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
50 words
The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the processor calculates the absolute value of the piecewise first derivatives according to an expression P(i)=|M(i+1)-M(1)| where P(i) is a vector containing the absolute value of the piecewise first derivatives and M is the vector containing the sampled values generated by the sampler.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
40 words
The apparatus recited in claim 4, wherein the processor calculates the summation constant according to the expression C=ΣP(i){i=1 . . . (n-1)} where C is the summation constant and n is the number of sampled values generated by the sampler.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
71 words
The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the modulation detector compares the summation constant against a product represented by the expression (k) (Tmin) (B1) (B2) where k is a proportionality constant, T min is a minimum number of discrete transitions of the received signal strength indicator waveform over the sampling window, B1 is an average change in the received signal strength indicator waveform per transition and B2 is a sampling sensitivity.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
86 words
A method for distinguishing between received signal modulation types comprising the steps of: generating a received signal strength indicator waveform whose value is logarithmically proportional to the amplitude of a received signal; sampling the received signal strength indicator waveform over a sampling window and generating sampled values; calculating an absolute values piecewise first derivatives of the sampled values; calculating a summation constant equal to the sum of the absolute values of the piecewise first derivatives; and determining the type of modulation based on the summation constant.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
86 words
A method for distinguishing between received signal modulation types comprising the steps of: generating a received signal strength indicator waveform whose value is logarithmically proportional to the amplitude of a received signal; sampling the received signal strength indicator waveform over a sampling window and generating sampled values; calculating an absolute values piecewise first derivatives of the sampled values; calculating a summation constant equal to the sum of the absolute values of the piecewise first derivatives; and determining the type of modulation based on the summation constant.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method recited in claim 7, wherein the received signal strength indicator waveform Vd is generated according to an expression Vd=(k) (Vi) where k is a proportionately constant and Vi is the received signal.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method recited in claim 7, wherein the step of sampling occurs at a rate of one thousand nine hundred forty four samples per second.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method recited in claim 7, wherein the step of calculating the absolute value of the piecewise first derivatives occurs according an expression P(i)=|M(i+1)-M(1)| where P(i) is a vector containing the absolute values of the piecewise first derivatives and M is the vector containing the sampled values generated by the sampler.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method recited in claim 10, wherein the step of calculating the summation constant occurs according to an expression C=ΣP(i){i=1 . . . (n-1)} where C is the summation constant and n is a number of sampled values generated by the sampler.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
69 words
The apparatus recited in claim 7, wherein the step of determining the type of modulation further includes comparing the summation constant against a product represented by an expression (k) (Tmin) (B1) (B2) where k is a proportionality constant, T min is a minimum number of discrete transitions of the received signal strength indicator waveform over the sampling window, B1 is an average change in the received signal strength indicator.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-08-31 | 2002-03-02 | 2002-09-01 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-08-31 | 2006-03-02 | 2006-09-01 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-08-31 | 2010-03-02 | 2010-09-01 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |