US5796861A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Mosaic construction, processing, and review of very large electronic micrograph composites
Assignee: Frim International Inc
•
Filing: 1997-07-11
•
Granted: 1998-08-18
•
Expires: 2017-07-11
Abstract
Abstract A method is described for acquisition, mosaicking, cueing and interactive review of large-scale transmission electron micrograph composite images. Individual frames are automatically registered and mosaiced together into a single virtual image composite, which is then used to perform automatic cueing of axons and axon clusters, as well as review and marking by qualified neuroanatomists. Statistics derived from the review process were used to evaluate the efficacy of the drug in promoting regeneration of myelinated nerve fibers.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert C. Vogt
- 👤 John M. Trenkle
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 23:12
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T3/00; G06T3/40; G06T3/4038; G06T11/00; G06V; G06V20/00; G06V20/60; G06V20/69; G06V20/693; G06V10/00; G06V10/10; G06V10/16
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
78 words
An automated mosaic construction process and review method for electron micrograph composite images, comprising the steps of: imaging a nerve cross-section at high magnification to obtain a plurality of high-resolution images arranged as multiple frames within multiple rows; registering the frames within each row and between rows; mosaicking the frames into a single, large composite image; and performing one or more morphological operations to assist in estimating the number of axons, clusters, and fibers within the composite image.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
78 words
An automated mosaic construction process and review method for electron micrograph composite images, comprising the steps of: imaging a nerve cross-section at high magnification to obtain a plurality of high-resolution images arranged as multiple frames within multiple rows; registering the frames within each row and between rows; mosaicking the frames into a single, large composite image; and performing one or more morphological operations to assist in estimating the number of axons, clusters, and fibers within the composite image.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
83 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of performing one or more morphological operations to assist in estimating the number of axons within the composite image further includes the steps of: performing an opening operation on the composite image using a structural element which is wider than the width of any axon; then performing a grey-level conditional dilation to recover regions of the background that were lost by the opening, but still connected to larger background regions that had not been removed.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
62 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of performing one or more morphological operations to assist in estimating the number of fibers within the composite image further includes the steps of: performing a closing operation on the composite image using a structural element larger than the width of any fiber; then performing a grey-level conditional erosion; and automatically thresholding the result.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of performing one or more morphological operations to assist in estimating the number of fibers within the composite image further includes the step of: conditionally dilating the axons estimate over the fiber estimate, and eliminating fiber groups along the image border.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of registering the frames further includes the steps of: averaging the frames to obtain a mean image; dividing the mean image into each frame; and analyzing the resulting floating point image histogram to determine the ideal contrast enhancement.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of registering the frames within each row further includes the steps of: examining potential offsets associated with adjacent frames in a row for the best correspondence.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 6, wherein the step of examining potential offsets associated with adjacent frames in a row further includes the steps of: obtaining a reasonable search starting point with low-resolution data; and performing a full-resolution tree-search to find a precise match position between frames.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method of claim 7, wherein the step of obtaining a reasonable search starting point with low-resolution data further includes the steps of: selecting equal-sized subsections from each image; downsampling the subsections by a predetermined factor; binarizing the subimages by thresholding at their median levels; and performing a full binary correlation was performed over these small chips.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method of claim 7, wherein the step of performing a full-resolution tree-search to find a precise match position between frames further includes the steps of: performing a hierarchical, or "spiraling" tree search; extracting equal-sized subimages from each image that would fully cover the search region; binarizing the subimages through median thresholding; and morphologically filtering the sub-images to remove fine structures.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of registering the frames between rows further includes the steps of: determining a correspondence factor between rows; and shifting all of the frames within a row to be registered in accordance with the correspondence factor.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of mosaicking the frames further includes the steps of generating image tiles which are adjacent but non-overlapping, and of a convenient, fixed size; and generating a single, low-resolution image by downsample-averaging each virtual image tile in both directions.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4761075A
Cited
US5287272A
Cited
US5287272B1
Cited
US5072382A
Cited
US5231580A
Cited
US5187754A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-08-17 | 2002-02-16 | 2002-08-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-08-17 | 2006-02-16 | 2006-08-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-08-17 | 2010-02-16 | 2010-08-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |