US5783991A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of detecting a deflated tire on a vehicle
Assignee: Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd
•
Filing: 1997-02-06
•
Granted: 1998-07-21
•
Expires: 2017-02-06
Abstract
Abstract A method of detecting a deflated tire on a vehicle by comparing the rolling radii of the tires by comparing angular velocity speed signal values from wheel speed sensors provided on each of the wheels wherein whenever the tires are re-inflated or changed, a semi-automatic standardization procedure is initiated by the driver to enable the deflation warning system to automatically recalibrate the relative wheel speed signals.
Inventors
- 👤 David Jones
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 23:42
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60C; B60C23/00; B60C23/06; B60C23/061
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
341 words
A method of detecting a deflated tire on a vehicle by comparing the rolling radii of the tires by means of comparing angular velocity speed signal values C1, C2, C3 and C4 from wheel speed sensors on wheels 1-4 at the left-hand front, right-hand front, left-hand rear and right-hand rear wheel positions respectively, comprising the step of: calculating an error value DEL' in normal driving by processing the four angular velocity speed signal values C1-C4 in a central processing unit which subtracts the sum of the signal values from one pair of diagonally opposite wheels from the sum of the signal values from the other pair of diagonally opposite wheels and expressing the result as a percentage of the means of the sums D1'=(C1+C4-C2-C3)×50/((C1+C2+C3+C4)), sensing when the magnitude of the error value DEL' is between a DEL'MIN value of 0.05 and a DEL'MAX value of 0.5 and when it is carrying out the step of deciding which tire is apparently deflated by comparison of the angular velocity speed signal values C1-C4 with each other, and operating a tire warning indicator in the vehicle to warn the driver that the particular tire is deflated, wherein a semi-automatic standardization procedure initiated by the driver comprising firstly recording a data-set DS of four values Ct1-Ct4 comprising the total wheel speed signal values C1-C4 for each wheel 1-4 in a predetermined time period t, secondly deciding if the data-set DS is acceptable or unacceptable, repeating the said recording and deciding until a predetermined number N of acceptable data-sets DS have been accumulated, driving wheel speed factors FAW(1)-FAW(4) for each of the four wheels 1-4 respectively by dividing the accumulated overall total number of wheel speed signal values Ct1-Ct4 of each wheel 1-4 by the accumulated overall total wheel speed signal values of any one of the wheels 1-4, and subsequently in normal driving correcting the four wheel speed signal values C1-C4 by dividing each value by its respective wheel speed factor FAW(1)-FAW(4) and using these corrected wheel speed values to calculate the error value DEL'.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
341 words
A method of detecting a deflated tire on a vehicle by comparing the rolling radii of the tires by means of comparing angular velocity speed signal values C1, C2, C3 and C4 from wheel speed sensors on wheels 1-4 at the left-hand front, right-hand front, left-hand rear and right-hand rear wheel positions respectively, comprising the step of: calculating an error value DEL' in normal driving by processing the four angular velocity speed signal values C1-C4 in a central processing unit which subtracts the sum of the signal values from one pair of diagonally opposite wheels from the sum of the signal values from the other pair of diagonally opposite wheels and expressing the result as a percentage of the means of the sums D1'=(C1+C4-C2-C3)×50/((C1+C2+C3+C4)), sensing when the magnitude of the error value DEL' is between a DEL'MIN value of 0.05 and a DEL'MAX value of 0.5 and when it is carrying out the step of deciding which tire is apparently deflated by comparison of the angular velocity speed signal values C1-C4 with each other, and operating a tire warning indicator in the vehicle to warn the driver that the particular tire is deflated, wherein a semi-automatic standardization procedure initiated by the driver comprising firstly recording a data-set DS of four values Ct1-Ct4 comprising the total wheel speed signal values C1-C4 for each wheel 1-4 in a predetermined time period t, secondly deciding if the data-set DS is acceptable or unacceptable, repeating the said recording and deciding until a predetermined number N of acceptable data-sets DS have been accumulated, driving wheel speed factors FAW(1)-FAW(4) for each of the four wheels 1-4 respectively by dividing the accumulated overall total number of wheel speed signal values Ct1-Ct4 of each wheel 1-4 by the accumulated overall total wheel speed signal values of any one of the wheels 1-4, and subsequently in normal driving correcting the four wheel speed signal values C1-C4 by dividing each value by its respective wheel speed factor FAW(1)-FAW(4) and using these corrected wheel speed values to calculate the error value DEL'.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
88 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of deciding if the data-set DS is acceptable or unacceptable comprises: calculating a deciding error value DECDEL' from the data-set of four values Ct1-Ct4 wherein DECDEL'=(Ct1+Ct4-Ct2-Ct3)×50/((Ct1+Ct2+Ct3+Ct4)/4). comparing the deciding error value DECDEL' with the maximum error value DEL'MAX of the error value DEL' and if DECDEL' is less than 3 times DEL'MAX then accepting the data-set DS, a warning of a deflated tire being given only when the error value DEL' exceeds 3 times the minimum error value DEL'MIN.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
63 words
The method according to claim 2, wherein after 10% of the predetermined number N of acceptable data-set Ds have been accumulated then subsequent data-sets are accepted only if the deciding error factor DECDEL' is less than 1.5 times the maximum error value DEL'MAX and a deflated tire warning is given when the error value DEL' exceeds 1.5 times the minimum error value DEL'MIN.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method according to claim 3, wherein after 30% of the predetermined number N of acceptable data-set DS have been accumulated then subsequent data-sets are accepted only if the deciding error factor DECDEL' is less than the maximum error value DEL'MAX.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
216 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of deciding if the data-set DS is acceptable or unacceptable comprises determining from the data-set DS of the four values Ct1-Ct4 of the four total wheel speed signal values a lateral acceleration factor LAT, by calculating from the four speed signal values Ct1, Ct2, Ct3 and Ct4 respective first, second, third and fourth deciding factors MC1, MC2, MC3, MC4 where ______________________________________
MC1 = Ct1
MC2 = Ct2/((Ct2+Ct4)/(Ct1+Ct3))
MC3 = Ct3/((Ct3+Ct4)/(Ct1+Ct1+Ct2))
MC4 = Ct4/(((Ct2+Ct4/Ct1+Ct3))×((Ct3+Ct4)/(Ct1+Ct2)))
______________________________________ then summing the four deciding factors and multiplying this sum by a centralizing constant K having a value in the range of 0.250125 to 0.250625 to give a central deciding factor MPSD and selecting the lateral acceleration factor LAT as follows: if the first or second deciding factor MC1 or MC2 is greater than the central deciding factor MPSD then LAT=2×(Ct3-Ct4)×(Ct1+Ct2+Ct3+Ct4)/(4×(KPHFAC).sup.2); if the third or fourth deciding factor MC3 or MC4 is greater than the central deciding factor MPSD then LAT=2×(Ct1-Ct2)×(Ct1+Ct2+Ct3+Ct4)/(4×(KPHFAC).sup.2) or if none of the deciding factors MC1, MC2, MC3 or MC4 is greater than the deciding factor MPSD then LAT=(Ct1+Ct3-Ct2-Ct4)×(Ct1+Ct2+Ct3+Ct4)/(4×(KPHFAC).sup.2) wherein KPHFAC is the number of wheel speed signals per wheel speed sensor per unit of speed and accepting the data-set DS if the value of LAT is less than 600.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method according to claim 5, wherein after 10% of the predetermined number N of acceptable data-sets Ds have been accumulated then subsequent data-sets are accepted only if the value of LAT is less than 300.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method according to claim 6, wherein after 30% of the predetermined number N of acceptable data-sets DS have been accumulated then subsequent data-sets are accepted only if the value of LAT is less than 200.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method according to claim 5, wherein the central deciding constant K has a value of 0.2505.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein before the number of acceptable data-sets DS have reached 10% of the predetermined number N of acceptable data-sets, if a significant proportion of data-sets DS have been found unacceptable, then a warning is given to the driver that the standardisation process is unable to be carried out.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method according to claim 9, wherein a significant proportion of data-sets is greater than 60%.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined number N of acceptable data-sets DS is 1000.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined time period t is 5 seconds.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5239469A
Cited
US5248957A
Cited
US5252946A
Cited
US5345217A
Cited
EP0647536A1
Cited
EP0657313A2
Cited
EP0751018A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-07-20 | 2002-01-19 | 2002-07-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-07-20 | 2006-01-19 | 2006-07-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-07-20 | 2010-01-19 | 2010-07-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |