← Back to Patent Explorer
US5751971A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Internet protocol (IP) work group routing

Assignee: Enterasys Networks Inc
•
Filing: 1995-07-12
•
Granted: 1998-05-12
•
Expires: 2015-07-12
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Apparatus and method wherein multiple router interfaces are assigned the same IP network address, creating an IP work group. This enhances host mobility by allowing, in one embodiment, a host to be relocated anywhere in the work group without requiring reconfiguration of the host. As a further option, host address ranges may be specified (i.e., locked) to designated interfaces of the work group, to enhance security by restricting the allowed host mobility within the work group. An additional advantage is a reduced consumption of network and subnet addresses, because now a single address is used for several physical networks.

Inventors

  • 👤 Kurt A. Dobbins
  • 👤 David L. Cullerot
  • 👤 Stephen H. Negus
  • 👤 William T. Haggerty

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-27 04:17
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04L; H04L12/00; H04L12/28; H04L12/46; H04L12/4604; H04L12/462; H04L12/4625; H04L61/00; H04L61/09; H04L61/25; H04L61/50; H04L61/5069; H04L63/00; H04L63/02; H04L63/0227; H04L63/0236; H04L69/00; H04L69/16; H04L69/161; H04L69/165; H04L9/00; H04L9/40; H04L2101/00; H04L2101/60; H04L2101/677

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 34
Claim 1
Independent Claim 255 words
A method of routing datagrams from a source to a destination in an IP communications network including routers having multiple router interfaces connecting multiple physical networks, wherein the routers forward IP datagrams based upon IP addresses, the method comprising the steps of: defining an IP work group by assigning multiple router interfaces connecting a given router to multiple host networks, a single IP work group address, forwarding IP datagrams through the routers based on the IP work group address; and assigning a security level to the IP work group by identifying hosts as "free" in order to permit forwarding to/from any interface in the group or "secured" in order to permit forwarding to/from a designated interface in the group wherein four levels of security are provided: in a "low" security work group, a host with any physical address is free to reside on any interface in the group as long as its IP address does not lie within a specified host address range, but if it does fall in the rangers then it must reside on a designated interface for that range; in a "medium" security work group, a host's IP address must fall within a specified host address range for a designated interface, but unless a physical address is also specified, the physical address is not constrained; in a "high" security work group, a host must have a specified host IP address for a designated interface and have a designated physical address; and in a "none" security work group, a host are is free.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 255 words
A method of routing datagrams from a source to a destination in an IP communications network including routers having multiple router interfaces connecting multiple physical networks, wherein the routers forward IP datagrams based upon IP addresses, the method comprising the steps of: defining an IP work group by assigning multiple router interfaces connecting a given router to multiple host networks, a single IP work group address, forwarding IP datagrams through the routers based on the IP work group address; and assigning a security level to the IP work group by identifying hosts as "free" in order to permit forwarding to/from any interface in the group or "secured" in order to permit forwarding to/from a designated interface in the group wherein four levels of security are provided: in a "low" security work group, a host with any physical address is free to reside on any interface in the group as long as its IP address does not lie within a specified host address range, but if it does fall in the rangers then it must reside on a designated interface for that range; in a "medium" security work group, a host's IP address must fall within a specified host address range for a designated interface, but unless a physical address is also specified, the physical address is not constrained; in a "high" security work group, a host must have a specified host IP address for a designated interface and have a designated physical address; and in a "none" security work group, a host are is free.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 1, wherein a range table is maintained with the specified host address ranges and their designated interfaces.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 102 words
In a method of forwarding IP datagrams in a router based on IP address, wherein the router has multiple host network interface comprising; multiple physical interfaces connecting multiple host networks to the router, the improvement comprising: assigning a plurality of the multiple host network interfaces to an IP work group, the IP work group having a single IP work group address; and the router forwarding IP datagrams to the multiple host network interfaces based on the IP work group address, such that a host is attachable to any interface in the IP work group without requiring reconfiguration of the host IP address.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 102 words
In a method of forwarding IP datagrams in a router based on IP address, wherein the router has multiple host network interface comprising; multiple physical interfaces connecting multiple host networks to the router, the improvement comprising: assigning a plurality of the multiple host network interfaces to an IP work group, the IP work group having a single IP work group address; and the router forwarding IP datagrams to the multiple host network interfaces based on the IP work group address, such that a host is attachable to any interface in the IP work group without requiring reconfiguration of the host IP address.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 44 words
The method of claim 3, including assigning one or more of the multiple host network interfaces in the IP work group to a designated range of host IP addresses, and wherein forwarding of IP datagrams is restricted to hosts complying with the designated range.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method of claim 4, wherein select interfaces are assigned to the same host IP address range.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 16 words
The method of claim 5, wherein select interfaces are assigned to different host IP address ranges.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method of claim 6, wherein one security level identifies hosts as "free" in order to permit forwarding to/from any interface in the group, and another security level identifies hosts as "secured" in order to permit forwarding to/from one or more designated interfaces in the group.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 64 words
The method of claim 7, wherein the secured level includes a "low" security work group wherein a host with any physical address is free to reside on any interface as long as its IP address does not lie within a specified host address range, but if it does fall in the specified range then it must reside on a designated interface for that range.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 51 words
The method of any one of claims 7 and 8 wherein the secured level includes a "medium" security work group wherein a host's IP address must fall within a specified host address range for a designated interface, but unless a physical address is also specified, the physical address is not constrained.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 35 words
The method of claim 9, wherein the secured level includes a "high" security work group wherein a host must have a specified host IP address for a designated interface and have a designated physical address.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method of claim 6, further comprising maintaining a count of known interfaces within the work group.
Claim 14
Independent Claim 48 words
The method of any one of claims 3 and 4, including assigning one or more of the multiple host network interfaces in the IP work group a designated range of host physical address(es), and wherein forwarding of IP datagrams is restricted to hosts complying with the designated range.
Claim 15
Independent Claim 14 words
The method of claim, wherein the designated range is for a single physical address.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method of claim 4, including maintaining a host table of IP host addresses and their associated interfaces.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 14, further comprising reviewing the host table for duplicate IP host addresses and associated interfaces.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of claim 4, further comprising monitoring the hosts heard on each interface and maintaining a host table of IP host addresses and associated interfaces on which each host is heard.
Claim 19
Independent Claim 27 words
The method of any one of claims 14 and 16, wherein the host table is maintained as a cache memory accessible by each of the multiple interfaces.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method of claim 27, further comprising: providing a work group forwarding agent for each IP work group.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 40 words
The method of claim 18, further comprising: maintaining a host table of IP host addresses and their associated interfaces; and wherein the work group forwarding agent, prior to forwarding an IP datagram, accesses the host table for the associated interface.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method of claim 19, wherein: the work group forwarding agent sends ARP requests to all interfaces in the work group to resolve an unknown host physical address.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 20, further comprising: providing an ARP forwarding agent at each interface in the work group, for accessing the host table.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method of claim 4, further comprising: maintaining a range table of host IP addresses and associated interfaces on which the hosts may reside; and prior to forwarding a datagram, accessing the range table to validate at least one of a source host and a destination host.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 43 words
The method of claim 3, including assigning one or more of the multiple host network interfaces in the IP work group to a designated level of security, and wherein forwarding of IP datagrams is restricted to compliance with the designated level of security.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of claim 3, wherein if an IP datagram contains source and destination host addresses within the same IP work group, forwarding the IP datagram without performing header and address validation.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 3, further including configuring a forwarding information base (FIB) with a route for the IP work group.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 101 words
In a router for forwarding IP datagrams based on IP address, wherein the router has multiple host network interface comprising multiple physical interfaces connecting multiple host networks to the router, the improvement comprising: means for assigning a plurality of the multiple host network interfaces to an IP work group, the IP work group having a single IP work group address; and means for forwarding IP datagrams to the multiple host network interfaces based on the IP work group address, such that a host is attachable to any interface in the IP work group without requiring reconfiguration of the host IP address.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 101 words
In a router for forwarding IP datagrams based on IP address, wherein the router has multiple host network interface comprising multiple physical interfaces connecting multiple host networks to the router, the improvement comprising: means for assigning a plurality of the multiple host network interfaces to an IP work group, the IP work group having a single IP work group address; and means for forwarding IP datagrams to the multiple host network interfaces based on the IP work group address, such that a host is attachable to any interface in the IP work group without requiring reconfiguration of the host IP address.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 50 words
The router of claim 26, including means for assigning one or more of the multiple host network interfaces in the IP work group to a designated range of host IP addresses, and wherein forwarding of IP datagrams by the forwarding means is restricted to hosts complying with the designated range.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 19 words
The router of claim 27, wherein the assigning means assigns select interfaces to the same host IP address range.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 18 words
The router of claim 28, wherein the assigning means assigns select interfaces to different host IP address ranges.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 54 words
The router of any one of claims 26 and 27, including means for assigning one or more of the multiple host network interfaces in the IP work group a designated range of host physical address(es), and wherein forwarding of IP datagrams by the forwarding means is restricted to hosts complying with the designated range.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 49 words
The router of claim 26, including means for assigning one or more of the multiple host network interfaces in the IP work group to a designated level of security, and wherein forwarding of IP datagrams by the forwarding means is restricted to compliance with the designated level of security.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US5423002A Cited
US5432907A Cited
US5535338A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2001-05-11 2001-11-10 2002-05-12 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2005-05-11 2005-11-10 2006-05-12 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2009-05-11 2009-11-10 2010-05-12 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag