US5751582A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Controlling process modules using site models and monitor wafer control
Assignee: Texas Instruments Inc
•
Filing: 1996-09-24
•
Granted: 1998-05-12
•
Expires: 2016-09-24
Abstract
Abstract A method is described for controlling a plurality of nonuniformity parameters in processing discrete products such as semiconductor wafers through a module consisting of several individual processes using site models. The method uses a controlled process to compensate for a subsequent uncontrolled process, which allows process goals of one process to be optimized to enhance the output of a subsequent process of the same module.
Inventors
- 👤 Sharad Saxena
- 👤 Purnendu K. Mozumder
- 👤 Gregory B. Shinn
- 👤 Kelly J. Taylor
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 15:40
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B19/00; G05B19/02; G05B19/418; G05B19/41875; G05B2219/00; G05B2219/30; G05B2219/37; G05B2219/37576; G05B2219/45; G05B2219/45026; G05B2219/45199; Y; Y02; Y02P; Y02P90/00; Y02P90/02
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
341 words
A method of simultaneously controlling a plurality of nonuniformity measures in processing discrete products through a module consisting of a plurality individual processes, said method comprising: a. establishing a process model for a first process of said module by relating a plurality of product quality parameters to a plurality of process control variables to obtain an initial setting for said plurality of process control variables; b. determining goals for the output of a second process in said module subsequent to said first process which could be better achieved by changing the output of a previous process; c. changing the goals of said first process of said module to achieve the goals of said second process and establishing a set of process control variables for said first process; d. processing one or more products and measuring one or more product quality parameters on said products; e. exercising quality control tests on said products; f. if quality control tests do not indicate significant difference from said first process model prediction and goals then continuing processing at step g, otherwise continue by: (1) processing at least one monitor product to obtain observations for tuning using settings determined by local experiment design; (2) tuning said process models to create tuned process models using said plurality of product quality parameters from said products of step d, wherein said tuning estimates a changed state of said processing with the use of process models; (3) estimating new values for said plurality of process control variables from said tuned models; and (4) continuing processing products with said new values of said plurality of process control variables by repeating again at step d, substituting new products for said first plurality of products; g. continuing to process plurality of products through subsequent process of said process module; and h. monitoring the output of said second process and continuing processing a step g if said output of said second process is within process goals otherwise continuing with step b if said output of said second process is not within process goal tolerances.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
341 words
A method of simultaneously controlling a plurality of nonuniformity measures in processing discrete products through a module consisting of a plurality individual processes, said method comprising: a. establishing a process model for a first process of said module by relating a plurality of product quality parameters to a plurality of process control variables to obtain an initial setting for said plurality of process control variables; b. determining goals for the output of a second process in said module subsequent to said first process which could be better achieved by changing the output of a previous process; c. changing the goals of said first process of said module to achieve the goals of said second process and establishing a set of process control variables for said first process; d. processing one or more products and measuring one or more product quality parameters on said products; e. exercising quality control tests on said products; f. if quality control tests do not indicate significant difference from said first process model prediction and goals then continuing processing at step g, otherwise continue by: (1) processing at least one monitor product to obtain observations for tuning using settings determined by local experiment design; (2) tuning said process models to create tuned process models using said plurality of product quality parameters from said products of step d, wherein said tuning estimates a changed state of said processing with the use of process models; (3) estimating new values for said plurality of process control variables from said tuned models; and (4) continuing processing products with said new values of said plurality of process control variables by repeating again at step d, substituting new products for said first plurality of products; g. continuing to process plurality of products through subsequent process of said process module; and h. monitoring the output of said second process and continuing processing a step g if said output of said second process is within process goals otherwise continuing with step b if said output of said second process is not within process goal tolerances.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said process models include site models and said site models model measures of nonuniformity and asymmetry as functions of sites.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of product quality parameters is a function of a plurality of model outputs of said process models, thereby providing a separation of said plurality of model outputs from said predetermined set of goals.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1, wherein site models are used to define uniformity patterns at a process step to compensate for nonuniformity introduced by a subsequent step.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 1, wherein a controlled process in the module is used to compensate for non-controlled subsequent process in the module.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said discrete products are semiconductor wafers.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 6, wherein said process models include site models and said site models model measures of nonuniformity and asymmetry as a functions of sites.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 6, wherein said plurality of product quality parameters is a function of a plurality of model outputs of said process models, thereby providing a separation of said plurality of model outputs from said predetermined set of goals.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 6, wherein site models are used to define uniformity patterns at a process step to compensate for nonuniformity introduced by a subsequent step.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 6, wherein a controlled process in the module is used to compensate for non-controlled subsequent process in the module.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
363 words
A method of simultaneously controlling a plurality of nonuniformity measures in processing semiconductor wafers through a module consisting of a plurality individual processes, said method comprising: a. establishing a process model for a first process of said module by relating a plurality of product quality parameters to a plurality of process control variables to obtain an initial setting for said plurality of process control variables wherein said process models include site models and said site models model measures of nonuniformity and asymmetry as a functions of sites; b. determining goals for the output of a second process in said module subsequent to said first process which could be better achieved by changing the output of a previous process; c. changing the goals of said first process of said module to achieve the goals of said second process and establishing a set of process control variables for said first process; d. processing one or more wafers and measuring one or more product quality parameters on said products; e. exercising quality control tests on said wafers; f. if quality control tests do not indicate significant difference from said first process model prediction and goals then continuing processing at step g, otherwise continue by: (1) processing at least one monitor wafer to obtain observations for tuning using settings determined by local experiment design; (2) tuning said process models to create tuned process models using said plurality of product quality parameters from said wafers of step d, wherein said tuning estimates a changed state of said processing with the use of process models; (3) estimating new values for said plurality of process control variables from said tuned models; and (4) continuing processing wafers with said new values of said plurality of process control variables by repeating again at step d, substituting new wafers for said first plurality of products; g. continuing to process plurality of wafers through subsequent process of said process module; and h. monitoring the output of said second process and continuing processing a step g if said output of said second process is within process goals otherwise continuing with step b if said output of said second process is not within process goal tolerances.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
363 words
A method of simultaneously controlling a plurality of nonuniformity measures in processing semiconductor wafers through a module consisting of a plurality individual processes, said method comprising: a. establishing a process model for a first process of said module by relating a plurality of product quality parameters to a plurality of process control variables to obtain an initial setting for said plurality of process control variables wherein said process models include site models and said site models model measures of nonuniformity and asymmetry as a functions of sites; b. determining goals for the output of a second process in said module subsequent to said first process which could be better achieved by changing the output of a previous process; c. changing the goals of said first process of said module to achieve the goals of said second process and establishing a set of process control variables for said first process; d. processing one or more wafers and measuring one or more product quality parameters on said products; e. exercising quality control tests on said wafers; f. if quality control tests do not indicate significant difference from said first process model prediction and goals then continuing processing at step g, otherwise continue by: (1) processing at least one monitor wafer to obtain observations for tuning using settings determined by local experiment design; (2) tuning said process models to create tuned process models using said plurality of product quality parameters from said wafers of step d, wherein said tuning estimates a changed state of said processing with the use of process models; (3) estimating new values for said plurality of process control variables from said tuned models; and (4) continuing processing wafers with said new values of said plurality of process control variables by repeating again at step d, substituting new wafers for said first plurality of products; g. continuing to process plurality of wafers through subsequent process of said process module; and h. monitoring the output of said second process and continuing processing a step g if said output of said second process is within process goals otherwise continuing with step b if said output of said second process is not within process goal tolerances.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method of claim 11, wherein said plurality of product quality parameters is a function of a plurality of model outputs of said process models, thereby providing a separation o f said plurality of model outputs from said predetermined set of goals.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 11, wherein site models are used to define uniformity patterns at a process step to compensate for nonuniformity introduced by a subsequent step.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 11, wherein a controlled process in the module is used to compensate for non-controlled subsequent process in the module.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 11, wherein said process module includes the processes of depositing PETEOS oxide on said wafer and etching contact vias.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 11, wherein said process module includes the processes of depositing PETEOS oxide on said wafer and planarizing by chemical mechanical polishing.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
118 words
A method of controlling a multi-step process module for manufacturing a product, said method comprising the steps: a. processing a raw material input with a controlled process with at least one controllable parameter to produce an intermediate product; b. processing said intermediate product with at least one uncontrolled process to produce a final product, at least one uncontrolled process producing nonuniform results across said final product; c. measuring characteristics of said final product to determine if the final product is within specification throughout said final product; d. adjusting at least one parameter of said controlled process to compensate for the nonuniform effect of step b if said final product is not in specification; and e. repeating steps a-d.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
118 words
A method of controlling a multi-step process module for manufacturing a product, said method comprising the steps: a. processing a raw material input with a controlled process with at least one controllable parameter to produce an intermediate product; b. processing said intermediate product with at least one uncontrolled process to produce a final product, at least one uncontrolled process producing nonuniform results across said final product; c. measuring characteristics of said final product to determine if the final product is within specification throughout said final product; d. adjusting at least one parameter of said controlled process to compensate for the nonuniform effect of step b if said final product is not in specification; and e. repeating steps a-d.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 17, wherein site models are used to define uniformity patterns at a process step to compensate for nonuniformity introduced by a subsequent step.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 17, wherein a controlled process in said module is used to compensate for non-controlled subsequent process in the module.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 17, wherein said process module includes the processes of depositing PETEOS oxide on a wafer and etching contact vias.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 17, wherein said process module includes the processes of depositing PETEOS.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3601588A
Cited
US5282131A
Cited
US5408405A
Cited
US5546312A
Cited
US5568408A
Cited
US5661669A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-05-11 | 2001-11-10 | 2002-05-12 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-05-11 | 2005-11-10 | 2006-05-12 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-05-11 | 2009-11-10 | 2010-05-12 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |