US5711673A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for interpreting a plurality of response marks on a scannable surface
Assignee: National Computer Systems Inc
•
Filing: 1995-02-24
•
Granted: 1998-01-27
•
Expires: 2015-02-24
Abstract
Abstract To determine a read level threshold for discriminating those response bubbles on a scannable answer sheet intended to be marked from those response bubbles not intended to be marked, an adjustable read level threshold is dynamically determined based on the read levels of a designated pool of response bubbles. Response bubble marks having a darkness read level at or above a threshold level are interpreted to be intended response marks, and different response bubbles in which response marks may be found are assigned different predetermined scoring values.
Inventors
- 👤 John N. Grundy, Jr.
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 13:43
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06K; G06K7/00; G06K7/10; G06K7/14; G06K7/1404; G06K7/146; G06K7/1478; G06K17/00; G06K17/0032
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
121 words
A system for interpreting response bubble marks on a scannable surface including a plurality of response bubbles associated with a single question for receiving a respondent's response bubble marks responsive to said question, said system comprising: scanner means for determining and storing a read level for each of the plurality of response bubbles, each said read level being one of a plurality of values on a mark darkness scale; means for identifying each response bubble mark having a darkness read level at or above a read level threshold as an intended response mark; and means for assigning a scoring value to each of said plurality of response bubbles, wherein at least two different response bubbles are assigned different non-zero scoring values.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
121 words
A system for interpreting response bubble marks on a scannable surface including a plurality of response bubbles associated with a single question for receiving a respondent's response bubble marks responsive to said question, said system comprising: scanner means for determining and storing a read level for each of the plurality of response bubbles, each said read level being one of a plurality of values on a mark darkness scale; means for identifying each response bubble mark having a darkness read level at or above a read level threshold as an intended response mark; and means for assigning a scoring value to each of said plurality of response bubbles, wherein at least two different response bubbles are assigned different non-zero scoring values.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
16 words
A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the different non-zero scoring values are both positive.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
20 words
A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the different non-zero scoring values include one positive and one negative value.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
114 words
A method for interpreting response bubble marks on a scannable surface including a plurality of response bubbles associated with a single question for receiving a respondent's response bubble marks responsive to said question, said method comprising: determining and storing a read level for each of the plurality of response bubbles, each said read level being one of a plurality of values on a mark darkness scale; identifying each response bubble mark having a darkness read level at or above a read level threshold as an intended response mark; and assigning a scoring value to each of said plurality of response bubbles, wherein at least two different response bubbles are assigned different non-zero scoring values.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
114 words
A method for interpreting response bubble marks on a scannable surface including a plurality of response bubbles associated with a single question for receiving a respondent's response bubble marks responsive to said question, said method comprising: determining and storing a read level for each of the plurality of response bubbles, each said read level being one of a plurality of values on a mark darkness scale; identifying each response bubble mark having a darkness read level at or above a read level threshold as an intended response mark; and assigning a scoring value to each of said plurality of response bubbles, wherein at least two different response bubbles are assigned different non-zero scoring values.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the different non-zero scoring values are both positive.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the different non-zero scoring values include one positive and one negative value.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
66 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the stored read levels together define a read level profile, and the means for identifying an intended response mark further comprises: threshold selection means for selecting an adjustable read level threshold, comprising: means for identifying read level gaps in the read level profile; and threshold setting means responsive to read level gaps identified for setting the adjustable read level threshold.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
47 words
The system of claim 7 wherein the threshold selection means further comprises means for defining a starting point read level and identifying the first read level gap of a specified gap length that encompasses read level values representing less mark darkness than the starting point read level.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
43 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the means for defining a starting point read level comprises means for computing an average of all read level values greater than a pre-defined noise level for the response bubbles of a designated pool of response bubbles.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
39 words
The system of claim 9 wherein said threshold selection means selects the read level gap that spans the darkest read levels on the mark darkness scale and is also at a read level below the starting point read level.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
72 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the threshold selection means comprises means for defining a starting point read level and identifying the first read level gap of a specified gap length that encompasses read level values representing less mark darkness than the starting point read level, said threshold selection means setting the adjustable read level threshold at one read level darker than the darkest read level in the first read level gap.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
90 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the system further comprises: means for storing a low fixed cut-off value and a high fixed cut-off value, each being a read level value on the mark darkness scale; and the threshold selection means is responsive to said means for storing and comprises: means for limiting selection of the adjustable read level threshold to a value no higher than said high fixed cut-off; and means for limiting selection of the adjustable read level threshold to a value no lower than said low fixed cut-off.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
35 words
The system of claim 8 wherein said specified gap length is a primary gap length of two, with a secondary gap length of one applied when no gap of the primary gap length is present.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
73 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the stored read levels together define a read level profile, and the step of identifying an intended response mark further comprises: identifying read level gaps in the read level profile; and in response to read level gaps identified, selecting an adjustable read level threshold and identifying each response bubble mark having a darkness read level at or above the adjustable read level as an intended response mark.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method of claim 14 wherein the steps of identifying read level gaps and selecting an adjustable read level threshold comprise the steps of defining a starting point read level and identifying the first read level gap of a specified gap length that encompasses read level values representing less mark darkness than the starting point read level.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 15 wherein the step of defining a starting point read level comprises computing an average of all read level values greater than a predefined noise level for the response bubbles of a designated pool of response bubbles.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 16 wherein said step of selecting an adjustable read level threshold comprises selecting the read level gap that spans the darkest read levels on the mark darkness scale and is also at a read level below the starting point read level.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
77 words
The method of claim 15 wherein the steps of identifying read level gaps and selecting an adjustable read level threshold comprise defining a starting point read level and identifying the first read level gap of a specified gap length that encompasses read level values representing less mark darkness than the starting point read level, then setting the adjustable read level threshold at one read level darker than the darkest read level in the first read level gap.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
88 words
The method of claim 15 wherein the method further comprises: storing a low fixed cut-off value and a high fixed cut-off value, each being a read level value on the mark darkness scale; and the step of selecting an adjustable read level threshold is responsive to said stored values and comprises: limiting selection of the adjustable read level threshold to a value no higher than said high fixed cut-off; and limiting selection of the adjustable read level threshold to a value no lower than said low fixed cut-off.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 15 wherein said specified gap length is a primary gap length of two, with a secondary gap length of one applied when no gap of the primary gap length is present.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3148460A
Cited
US3412484A
Cited
US3445942A
Cited
US3601906A
Cited
US3599349A
Cited
US4217487A
Cited
US4153895A
Cited
US4300123A
Cited
WO1984000832A1
Cited
US5073700A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2001-01-26 | 2001-07-28 | 2002-01-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2005-01-26 | 2005-07-28 | 2006-01-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2009-01-26 | 2009-07-28 | 2010-01-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |