US5703788A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Configuration management and automated test system ASIC design software
Assignee: Bell Semiconductor LLC
•
Filing: 1995-06-07
•
Granted: 1997-12-30
•
Expires: 2015-06-07
Abstract
Abstract A software configuration management and test System for tracking and testing an ASIC design software package includes a library of test programs, an autodetector, an autoverifier, a failure report generator, and a package information logger. The System automatically selects which tests to run on the tools package depending on which portions of which tools have been updated, and then automatically sequences the tools package through the selected tests. By automating the testing process, the System achieves automation, standardization, completeness, and a systematic approach to testing. By greatly reducing test turnaround time, the System also facilitates concurrent engineering.
Inventors
- 👤 Darlene Shei
- 👤 Jiurong Cheng
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 08:44
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/22; G06F30/00; G06F30/30; G06F30/32; G06F30/33
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
254 words
An apparatus for facilitating the operational reliability of a library of modules indicative of a set of interdependent software tools that cooperate with one another to enable a logic system designer to interconnect a plurality of integrated circuits for achieving a high level of functional integration therebetween, comprising: autodetector means for automatically detecting a module submission to the library of modules; autoverifier means for determining whether said module submission has a previously submitted archived module within the library of modules; modification identification means responsive to said verification means for comparing and identifying functionality changes between said module submission and said previously submitted archived module; module selection means responsive to said modification identification means for assembling an exclusive set of previously submitted archived modules with interdependence on said module submission; function identification means responsive to said module selection means for sequentially identifying individual functions in each individual previously submitted archived module in said exclusive set interdependent upon the identified functionality changes between said module submission and said previously submitted archived module; module testing means responsive to said function identification means for testing sequentially each identified function to verify its proper functional operation relative to each identified functional change between said module submission and said previously submitted archived module: and error reporting means responsive to said module testing means for generating a failure report that identifies each function that failed to perform its proper functional operation due to each individual one of the identified functional changes between said module submission and said previously submitted archived module.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
254 words
An apparatus for facilitating the operational reliability of a library of modules indicative of a set of interdependent software tools that cooperate with one another to enable a logic system designer to interconnect a plurality of integrated circuits for achieving a high level of functional integration therebetween, comprising: autodetector means for automatically detecting a module submission to the library of modules; autoverifier means for determining whether said module submission has a previously submitted archived module within the library of modules; modification identification means responsive to said verification means for comparing and identifying functionality changes between said module submission and said previously submitted archived module; module selection means responsive to said modification identification means for assembling an exclusive set of previously submitted archived modules with interdependence on said module submission; function identification means responsive to said module selection means for sequentially identifying individual functions in each individual previously submitted archived module in said exclusive set interdependent upon the identified functionality changes between said module submission and said previously submitted archived module; module testing means responsive to said function identification means for testing sequentially each identified function to verify its proper functional operation relative to each identified functional change between said module submission and said previously submitted archived module: and error reporting means responsive to said module testing means for generating a failure report that identifies each function that failed to perform its proper functional operation due to each individual one of the identified functional changes between said module submission and said previously submitted archived module.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
50 words
The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: system use reporting means for generating an approval indication that the identified functionality changes between said module submission and said previously submitted module have been tested and verified for proper functional operation relative to each individual function tested by said module testing means.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
The apparatus of claim 2, said autodetector means further comprising: means for automatically identifying lines of code within said design tools that have changed.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
82 words
The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said module selection means includes: interdependency identifying means for determining whether individual ones of the previously submitted archived modules have an interdependence on said module submission; said interdependency identifying means including: a first mapping means for mapping a line of code within said previously submitted archived module to a subroutine within which said line of code resides; and a second mapping means for mapping said subroutine to test programs within said library that exercise said subroutine.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
58 words
A system for automatically testing and verifying the operational reliability of a library of interdependent software tools, comprising: change identifier means for automatically identifying any modification in the library of interdependent software tools; and sequential tester means responsive to said change identifier means for automatically selecting and testing sequentially each interdependent software tool affected by the identified modification.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
58 words
A system for automatically testing and verifying the operational reliability of a library of interdependent software tools, comprising: change identifier means for automatically identifying any modification in the library of interdependent software tools; and sequential tester means responsive to said change identifier means for automatically selecting and testing sequentially each interdependent software tool affected by the identified modification.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
73 words
A system according to claim 5, wherein said sequential tester means includes: mapping means responsive to said change identifier means for automatically selecting individual ones of a suite of test programs that exercise functions of software tools upstream and downstream from any identified modifications and for automatically mapping the selected software tools to selected ones of the test programs that exercise functions of individual ones of the software tools selected from said library.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
17 words
A system according to claim 6, wherein said interdependent software tools include integrated circuit design software tools.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
16 words
A system according to claim 7, wherein the integrated circuit design tools are ASIC design tools.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
57 words
A system according to claim 8, further comprising: autoverifier means responsive to said tester means for generating an approval report whenever all the tested interdependent software tools affected by the identified modification operate in a functionally correct manner and for generating an error report identifying each software tool that fails to operate in a functionally correct manner.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
25 words
A system according to claim 9, wherein said error report includes an indication of the outputs and internal states of the selected interdependent software tools.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
17 words
The system of claim 10 further comprising: a package information logger for logging software tools package information.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
18 words
The system of claim 11, said software tools package information comprising: software tools version numbers; and test results.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
16 words
The system of claim 12 further comprising: a software tool archiver for storing software tool revisions.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
79 words
A method of automatically testing and verifying the operational reliability of a library of interdependent software tools, comprising: identifying automatically any modification in the library of interdependent software tools; selecting automatically each interdependent software tool affected by the modification; selected automatically from a library of software test programs a suite of test programs to test each interdependent software tool affected by the modification; and testing each selected interdependent software tool with selected ones of the suite of test programs.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
79 words
A method of automatically testing and verifying the operational reliability of a library of interdependent software tools, comprising: identifying automatically any modification in the library of interdependent software tools; selecting automatically each interdependent software tool affected by the modification; selected automatically from a library of software test programs a suite of test programs to test each interdependent software tool affected by the modification; and testing each selected interdependent software tool with selected ones of the suite of test programs.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method according to claim 14, wherein the step of selecting a suite of test programs includes: mapping the selected software tools to selected ones of the test programs to exercise the software tool functions affected by the modifications.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method according to claim 15, wherein the interdependent software tools are integrated circuit design tools.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method according to claim 16, wherein the integrated circuit design tools are ASIC design tools.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 17, further comprising generating automatically a failure report, said failure report including indications of outputs and internal states of the interdependent software tools.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
13 words
A method according to claim 18, further comprising: logging software tool package information.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-12-29 | 2001-06-30 | 2001-12-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-12-29 | 2005-06-30 | 2005-12-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-12-29 | 2009-06-30 | 2009-12-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |