Automatic language identification/verification system

Claim 2

A Language Verification System comprising: means for processing spoken text entered into the system whereby spoken text is converted into frames of speech, and wherein variations in input speech signals extrinsic to those introduced by a speaker's vocal tract are attenuated; means for detecting and extracting phonetic speech features that are syllabic nuclei, from said frames of speech; matching means for comparing said phonetic speech features with stored reference phonetic speech features and establishing a match score for said comparison proportional to degree of similarity between said phonetic speech features and said stored reference phonetic speech features; and, decision means for identifying said input speech as corresponding to one of a plurality of languages, whereby said language identification for said input speech is established on the basis of a comparison of said match score with at least one predetermined threshold score associated with at least one of said plurality of languages, said decision means encompasses a scoring methodology wherein multiple matched speakers within sand across a multiplicity of languages are identified as to a language spoken based on a score selected from the group consisting of a minimum score, an average score and a combination minimum-average score.

Claim 3

The Language Verification system of claim 1, wherein said detection of syllabic nuclei occurs through processing said input speech by a trained back error propagation multi-layer neural network.

Claim 4

The Language Verification System of claim 1, wherein feature information respecting said speech input is realized by encoding a plurality of frames of said input speech from a sequence of said frames proximate to the syllabic nuclei.

Claim 5

The Language Verification System of claim 1, wherein said matching means is implemented as a determination of nearest-neighbor Euclidian distances between said phonetic speech features and said stored reference phonetic speech features.

Claim 6

The Language Verification System of claim 1, wherein said matching means is implemented in a multi-level artificial neural network using back error propagation.

Claim 7

The Language Verification System of claim 5, wherein said multi-level artificial neural network operates at a first level to discriminate each of a plurality of languages at a single syllable level and at a second level to further separate said plurality of languages by sequential patterns.

Claim 8

The Language Verification System of claim 5, wherein said back-error propagation neural network is implemented through a multiplicity of levels for a language discrimination, thereby causing said language verification system to be speaker independent.

Claim 9

The Language Verification System of claim 1, wherein said means for extracting phonetic speech features and said matching means, in combination, are implemented in a Hidden Markov Model wherein a separate model is defined for each of a plurality of languages.

Claim 10

The Language Verification System of claim 8, wherein said Hidden Markov Model is based on syllabic speech features and structure, and wherein said model is speaker independent.

Claim 11

In a Language Verification System comprising a means for processing spoken text into frames of speech, a means for detecting and extracting speech features from said frames of speech, matching means for comparing said speech features with stored references speech features and establishing a matched score for said comparison proportional to a degree similarity between said speech features and said stored reference speech features, and decision means for identifying input speech to said system as corresponding to one of a plurality of languages, the improvement therewith comprising: means operable with said means for detecting and extracting speech features that are syllabic nuclei, to identify phonetic speech; means operable with said matching means to establish a match score proportional to a degree of similarity between the phonetic speech features and stored reference phonetic speech features; and, means operable with said decision means whereby said language identification for said input speech is established on the basis of a comparison of said matched scores with at least one predetermined threshold score associated with one of said plurality of languages, said means operable with said decision means encompasses a scoring methodology wherein multiple matched speakers within and across a multiplicity of languages are identified as to a language spoken based on a score selected from the group consisting of a minimum score, an average score and a combination minimum-average score.

Claim 12

In a Language Verification System comprising a means for processing spoken text into frames of speech, a means for detecting and extracting speech features from said frames of speech, matching means for comparing said speech features with stored references speech features and establishing a matched score for said comparison proportional to a degree similarity between said speech features and said stored reference speech features, and decision means for identifying input speech to said system as corresponding to one of a plurality of languages, the improvement therewith comprising: means operable with said means for detecting and extracting speech features that are syllabic nuclei, to identify phonetic speech; means operable with said matching means to establish a match score proportional to a degree of similarity between the phonetic speech features and stored reference phonetic speech features; and, means operable with said decision means whereby said language identification for said input speech is established on the basis of a comparison of said matched scores with at least one predetermined threshold score associated with one of said plurality of languages, said means operable with said decision means encompasses a scoring methodology wherein multiple matched speakers within and across a multiplicity of languages are identified as to a language spoken based on a score selected from the group consisting of a minimum score, an average score and a combination minimum-average score.

Claim 13

The Language Verification System of claim 3, wherein said detection of syllabic nuclei occurs through processing said input speech by a trained back error propagation multi-level neural network.

Claim 14

The Language Verification System of claim 3, wherein feature information respecting said input speech is realized by encoding a plurality of frames of said input speech from a sequence of said frames proximate to said syllabic nuclei.

Claim 15

The Language Verification System of claim 10, wherein said matching means is implemented as a determination of nearest-neighbor Euclidian distances between said phonetic speech features and said stored reference phonetic speech features.

Claim 16

The Language Verification System of claim 10, wherein said matching means is implemented in a multi-level artificial neural network using back error propagation.

Claim 17

The Language Verification System of claim 14, wherein said multi-level artificial neural network operates at a first level to discriminate each of a plurality of languages at a single syllable level and at a second level to further separate said plurality of languages by sequential patterns.

Claim 18

The Language Verification System of claim 14, wherein said back-error propagation neural network is implemented through a multiplicity of levels for a language discrimination, thereby causing said language verification system to be speaker independent.

Claim 19

The Language Verification System of claim 10, wherein said means for extracting phonetic speech features and said matching means, in combination, are implemented in a Hidden Markov Model wherein a separate model is defined for each of a plurality of languages.

Claim 20

The Language Verification System of claim 17, wherein said Hidden Markov Model is based on syllabic speech features and structure, and wherein said model is speaker independent.

Claim 21

The Language Verification System of claim 10, wherein said decision means encompasses a scoring methodology wherein multiple matched speakers within and across a multiplicity of languages are identified as to a language spoken based on a minimum score, an average score or a combination thereof.

Claim 24

The automatic language identification method of claim 2, wherein the detection of syllabic nuclei occurs through processing said input speech by a trained back error propagation multi-level neural network.

Claim 25

The automatic language identification method of claim 2, wherein feature information respecting said input speech is realized by encoding a plurality of frames of said input speech from a sequence of said frames proximate to said syllabic nuclei.

Claim 26

The automatic language identification method of claim 20, wherein said comparing step is implemented as a determination of nearest-neighbor Euclidian distances between said phonetic speech features and said stored reference phonetic speech features.

Claim 27

The automatic language identification method of claim 20, wherein said comparing step is implemented in a multi-level artificial neural network using back error propagation.

Claim 28

The automatic language identification method of claim 24, wherein said multi-level artificial neural network operates at a first level to discriminate each of a plurality of languages at a single syllable level and at a second level to further separate said plurality of languages by sequential patterns.

Claim 29

The automatic language identification method of claim 24, wherein said syllabic-delayed back-error propagation neural network is implemented through a multiplicity of levels for a language discrimination, thereby causing said language verification system to be speaker independent.

Claim 30

The automatic language identification method of claim 20, wherein the step of extracting phonetic speech features and the comparing step, in combination, are implemented in a Hidden Markov Model wherein a separate model is defined for each of a plurality of languages.

Claim 31

The automatic language identification method of claim 27, wherein said Hidden Markov Model is based on syllabic speech features and structure, and wherein said model is speaker independent.

Claim 32

The automatic language identification method of claim 20, wherein said identifying step encompasses a scoring methodology wherein multiple matched speakers within and across a multiplicity of languages are identified as to a language spoken based on a minimum score, an average score or a combination thereof.