US5687724A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Apparatus and method for determining variations in measured physical parameters of signal-generators
Assignee: ABRATECH Corp A CA CORPORATION
•
Filing: 1995-01-23
•
Granted: 1997-11-18
•
Expires: 2015-01-23
Abstract
Abstract The present invention encompasses apparatus and methods for determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters derived from signals created by signal-generators, such as signal-generators within organs of the body, such as brain, head, spinal cord, and muscles. The present invention is particularly useful when more than one signal generator is non-zero in part or all of the time-interval analyzed. The parameters of a signal-generator that may be of interest include, but are not limited to, magnitude, location, and/or orientation, over single or multiple points in time.
Inventors
- 👤 Don Lee Jewett
- 👤 Zhi Zhang
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 18:26
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F18/00; G06F2218/00; G06F2218/22
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 40
Claim 1
Independent Claim
135 words
An apparatus for determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes, said signals being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said apparatus comprising: (a) means for sensing said signals at at least one of said physical locations; (b) storing means coupled to said sensing means for storing the magnitudes of said signals at least one point in time; (c) variation means associated with said storing means for generating variation in the estimated signal-generator parameters from said stored magnitudes, wherein variation in estimated signal-generator parameters is determined by variations in E and F factors from an EF-space; and, (d) outputting means for outputting the estimated signal-generator parameters and the variations in the estimated signal generator parameters.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
135 words
An apparatus for determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes, said signals being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said apparatus comprising: (a) means for sensing said signals at at least one of said physical locations; (b) storing means coupled to said sensing means for storing the magnitudes of said signals at least one point in time; (c) variation means associated with said storing means for generating variation in the estimated signal-generator parameters from said stored magnitudes, wherein variation in estimated signal-generator parameters is determined by variations in E and F factors from an EF-space; and, (d) outputting means for outputting the estimated signal-generator parameters and the variations in the estimated signal generator parameters.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
14 words
The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a display coupled to said outputting means.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
20 words
The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said outputted variations of signal-generator parameters are converted into one or more stored difference-surfaces.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
14 words
The apparatus of claim 3, further comprising means to display said stored difference surfaces.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
28 words
The apparatus of claim 3, further comprising means for performing a numerical analysis of said stored difference-surfaces, and means for generating output of results of the numerical analysis.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
21 words
The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising means for estimating the signal-generator parameters from one or more points of the EF-space.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
42 words
The apparatus of claim 6, further comprising means for performing a numerical method to determine a flat region of the difference-surface, and means for choosing an E,F point in the flat region to estimate the signal generator parameters at said E,F point.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
31 words
The apparatus of claim 6, further comprising means for estimating the signal-generator parameters from the point of the EF-space in which all E-factors are zero and all the F-factors are one.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
113 words
A method for determining variations in the estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said method comprising: (a) sensing said signals at at least one of said physical locations; (b) storing an input of magnitudes of the signals at, at least, one point in time; (c) determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters; wherein the step of determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters is performed by varying E and F factors from EF-space; end, (d) outputting the estimated signal generator parameters and the variations of the estimated signal-generator parameters.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
113 words
A method for determining variations in the estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said method comprising: (a) sensing said signals at at least one of said physical locations; (b) storing an input of magnitudes of the signals at, at least, one point in time; (c) determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters; wherein the step of determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters is performed by varying E and F factors from EF-space; end, (d) outputting the estimated signal generator parameters and the variations of the estimated signal-generator parameters.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 9, wherein the outputting step comprises displaying the output.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 9, wherein said outputted variations of signal-generator parameters are converted into one or more stored difference-surfaces.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 11, wherein the outputting step comprises displaying said stored difference-surface.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 11, further comprising evaluating said stored difference-surfaces by numerical analysis of said stored difference-surface, and outputting said numerical analysis.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 9, further comprising estimating signal-generator parameters from one or more points of the EF-space.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 14, wherein the step of choosing the E-factors and F-factors comprises computing by a numerical method a flat region of the difference-surface, and then using the E-factor and F-factor at a point in the flat region to estimate signal-generator parameters.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 14, wherein the step of choosing the E-factors and F-factors comprises estimating signal-generator parameters from the point of the EF-space in which all E-factors are zero and all the F-factors are one.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
290 words
An apparatus for evaluating a given computational model by determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes and a signal space, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said apparatus comprising: (a) means for sensing said signals at at least two of said physical locations; (b) storing means coupled to said sensing means for storing the magnitudes of said signals at at least one point in time; (c) variation means associated with said storing means for estimating a first set of signal-generator parameters using said stored signal magnitudes and said given computational model, wherein said first set of estimated signal-generator parameters include a set of weighting functions; (d) first estimating means associate with said variation means for estimating the signal space from said signal; (e) correcting means associated with said first estimating means for projecting said first set of weighting functions onto said signal space to yield a second, corrected set of weighting functions; (f) means associated with said correcting means for selecting an E,F point; (g) construction means associated with said selecting means for constructing magnitude functions corresponding to said E,F point; (h) generating means associated with said construction means for generating a second signal from said second set of weighting functions and said magnitude functions; (i) second estimating means associated with said generating means for estimating a second set of signal-generator parameters using said second generated signal and said given computational model; (j) difference means associated with said first estimating means and said second estimating means for computing the difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
290 words
An apparatus for evaluating a given computational model by determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes and a signal space, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said apparatus comprising: (a) means for sensing said signals at at least two of said physical locations; (b) storing means coupled to said sensing means for storing the magnitudes of said signals at at least one point in time; (c) variation means associated with said storing means for estimating a first set of signal-generator parameters using said stored signal magnitudes and said given computational model, wherein said first set of estimated signal-generator parameters include a set of weighting functions; (d) first estimating means associate with said variation means for estimating the signal space from said signal; (e) correcting means associated with said first estimating means for projecting said first set of weighting functions onto said signal space to yield a second, corrected set of weighting functions; (f) means associated with said correcting means for selecting an E,F point; (g) construction means associated with said selecting means for constructing magnitude functions corresponding to said E,F point; (h) generating means associated with said construction means for generating a second signal from said second set of weighting functions and said magnitude functions; (i) second estimating means associated with said generating means for estimating a second set of signal-generator parameters using said second generated signal and said given computational model; (j) difference means associated with said first estimating means and said second estimating means for computing the difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
33 words
The apparatus according to claim 17 further comprising display means associated with said difference means for displaying said difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
53 words
The apparatus according to claim 17 further comprising: (k) means for selecting a plurality of E,F points to generate a plurality of sets of signal-generator parameters; and, (l) means for storing each of the differences between said first set of signal generator parameters and each of said plurality of sets of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
38 words
The apparatus according to claim 19, further comprising means associated with said difference means for displaying each of said differences between said first set of signal generator parameters and each of said plurality of sets of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
41 words
The apparatus according to claim 20, wherein said means for displaying each of said differences between said first set of signal generator parameters and each of said plurality of sets of signal-generator parameters displays a difference surface over an E,F plane.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
45 words
The apparatus for estimating signal-generator parameters according to claim 21, further comprising: (a) means for locating a flat region on said difference surface; (b) means for selecting an E,F point within said flat region; and, (c) means for estimating signal-generator parameters using said E,F point.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
30 words
An apparatus of claim 17 for estimating signal-generator parameters, wherein said means for selecting an E,F point comprises means for setting all E-factors to zero and all F-factors to one.
Claim 27
Independent Claim
208 words
An method for evaluating a given computational model by determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes and a signal space, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said method comprising: (a) sensing said signals at at least two of said physical locations; (b) storing the magnitudes of said signals at at least one point in time; (c) estimating a first set of signal-generator parameters using said stored signal magnitudes and said given computational model, wherein said first set of estimated signal-generator parameters includes a set of weighting functions; (d) estimating the signal space from said signal; (e) projecting said first set of weighting functions onto said signal space to yield a second, corrected set of weighting functions; (f) selecting an E,F point; (g) constructing magnitude functions corresponding to said E,F point; (h) generating a second signal from said second set of weighting functions and said magnitude functions; (i) estimating a second set of signal-generator parameters using said second generated signal and said given computational model; (j) computing the difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 28
Independent Claim
208 words
An method for evaluating a given computational model by determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes and a signal space, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said method comprising: (a) sensing said signals at at least two of said physical locations; (b) storing the magnitudes of said signals at at least one point in time; (c) estimating a first set of signal-generator parameters using said stored signal magnitudes and said given computational model, wherein said first set of estimated signal-generator parameters includes a set of weighting functions; (d) estimating the signal space from said signal; (e) projecting said first set of weighting functions onto said signal space to yield a second, corrected set of weighting functions; (f) selecting an E,F point; (g) constructing magnitude functions corresponding to said E,F point; (h) generating a second signal from said second set of weighting functions and said magnitude functions; (i) estimating a second set of signal-generator parameters using said second generated signal and said given computational model; (j) computing the difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method according to claim 24 further comprising displaying said difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method according to claim 24 further comprising: (k) selecting a plurality of E,F points to generate a plurality of sets of signal-generator parameters; and, (l) storing each of the differences between said first set of signal generator parameters and each of said plurality of sets of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method according to claim 26, further comprising displaying each of said differences between said first set of signal generator parameters and each of said plurality of sets of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method according to claim 27, wherein displaying each of said differences between said first set of signal generator parameters and each of said plurality of sets of signal-generator parameters comprises displaying a difference surface over an E,F plane.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method for estimating signal-generator parameters according to claim 28, further comprising: (a) locating a flat region on said difference surface; (b) selecting an E,F point within said flat region; and, (c) estimating signal-generator parameters using said E,F point.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
30 words
An method of claim 24 for estimating signal-generator parameters, wherein said means for selecting an E,F point comprises means for setting all E-factors to zero and all F-factors to one.
Claim 35
Independent Claim
265 words
An apparatus for evaluating a given computational model by determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes and a signal space, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said apparatus comprising: (a) sensing means for sensing said signals at at least two of said physical locations; (b) storing means associated with said sensing means for storing the magnitudes of said signals at at least one point in time; (c) estimating means associated with said storing means for estimating a first set of signal-generator parameters using said stored signal magnitudes and said given computational model, wherein said first set of estimated signal-generator parameters includes a set of weighting functions corresponding to said estimated signal generator parameters and said physical locations; (d) correcting means associated with said estimating means for correcting the estimated signal generator parameters based upon the said stored signal magnitudes to generate a second set of weighting functions; (e) manipulating means associated with said correcting means for manipulating said magnitude functions of said corrected signal generator parameters to generate a second signal from said second set of weighting functions and said manipulated magnitude functions; (f) second estimating means associated with said manipulating means for estimating a second set of signal-generator parameters using said second generated signal and said given computational model; (g) difference means associated with said first and second estimating means for computing the difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 36
Independent Claim
265 words
An apparatus for evaluating a given computational model by determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes and a signal space, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said apparatus comprising: (a) sensing means for sensing said signals at at least two of said physical locations; (b) storing means associated with said sensing means for storing the magnitudes of said signals at at least one point in time; (c) estimating means associated with said storing means for estimating a first set of signal-generator parameters using said stored signal magnitudes and said given computational model, wherein said first set of estimated signal-generator parameters includes a set of weighting functions corresponding to said estimated signal generator parameters and said physical locations; (d) correcting means associated with said estimating means for correcting the estimated signal generator parameters based upon the said stored signal magnitudes to generate a second set of weighting functions; (e) manipulating means associated with said correcting means for manipulating said magnitude functions of said corrected signal generator parameters to generate a second signal from said second set of weighting functions and said manipulated magnitude functions; (f) second estimating means associated with said manipulating means for estimating a second set of signal-generator parameters using said second generated signal and said given computational model; (g) difference means associated with said first and second estimating means for computing the difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
30 words
The apparatus of claim 31 wherein said difference means comprises means for computing the difference between said first corrected set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 38
Independent Claim
210 words
A method for evaluating a given computational model by determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes and a signal space, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said method comprising: (a) sensing said signals at at least two of said physical locations; (b) storing the magnitudes of said signals at at least one point in time; (c) estimating a first set of signal-generator parameters using said stored signal magnitudes and said given computational model, wherein said first set of estimated signal-generator parameters includes a set of weighting functions corresponding to said estimated signal generator parameters and said physical locations; (d) correcting the estimated signal generator parameters based upon the said stored signal magnitudes to generate a second set of weighting functions; (e) manipulating said magnitude functions of said corrected signal generator parameters to generate a second signal from said second set of weighting functions and said manipulated magnitude functions; (f) estimating a second set of signal-generator parameters using said second generated signal and said given computational model; (g) computing the difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 39
Independent Claim
210 words
A method for evaluating a given computational model by determining variations in estimated signal-generator parameters of a plurality of signal-generators, said signal-generators causing signals at a plurality of physical locations, said signals having magnitudes and a signal space, said signals having magnitudes being sensed at one or more selected points in time, said method comprising: (a) sensing said signals at at least two of said physical locations; (b) storing the magnitudes of said signals at at least one point in time; (c) estimating a first set of signal-generator parameters using said stored signal magnitudes and said given computational model, wherein said first set of estimated signal-generator parameters includes a set of weighting functions corresponding to said estimated signal generator parameters and said physical locations; (d) correcting the estimated signal generator parameters based upon the said stored signal magnitudes to generate a second set of weighting functions; (e) manipulating said magnitude functions of said corrected signal generator parameters to generate a second signal from said second set of weighting functions and said manipulated magnitude functions; (f) estimating a second set of signal-generator parameters using said second generated signal and said given computational model; (g) computing the difference between said first set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 33 wherein computing the difference comprises computing the difference between said first corrected set of signal-generator parameters and said second set of signal-generator parameters.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4328809A
Cited
US5170119A
Cited
US5027819A
Cited
US5307807A
Cited
US5220921A
Cited
US5417211A
Cited
US5313944A
Cited
US5458142A
Cited
US5526811A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-11-17 | 2001-05-19 | 2001-11-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-11-17 | 2005-05-19 | 2005-11-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-11-17 | 2009-05-19 | 2009-11-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |