← Back to Patent Explorer
US5675740A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

System for sending messages in a session using a mixture of protocols and preventing usage of a protocol when the message failing to meet a set of criteria

Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1994-08-16
•
Granted: 1997-10-07
•
Expires: 2014-08-16
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A session-oriented local area network (LAN) application and an ISO 8802-2 protocol driver code will cooperate in a new form of connectionless, session-oriented communication called Sideband. At each session start-up time, the LAN Application will communicate with the enhanced ISO 8802-2 based protocol driver on the local system and the LAN Application and the 8802-2 based protocol driver on the remote system to determine if they all support the Sideband. If Sideband is fully supported by both systems, Sideband will be activated for the session. To communicate on a session which has Sideband active, the LAN Application requests that data is to be sent using the Sideband. A check is performed to see if the data meets Sideband criteria. As Sideband is a connectionless medium, the additional code path needed to set up and track timers and to handle the resend attempts are saved in the protocol. If the LAN Application code is session-oriented, it will keep track of a timer which will cause the data to be resent along a non-Sideband path if a response is not received within a designated amount of time. Header information is stored and reused to increase the throughput and decrease the response time for the transmission of small network packets. In case the network at some points becomes unreliable, procedures are used to track the reliability of the network and to enable and disable Sideband in accordance with the reliability of the network.

Inventors

  • 👤 Daniel Dean Heimsoth
  • 👤 II Everett Arthur McCassey
  • 👤 Gregory Lynn Morris
  • 👤 Chun-tang Milton Li

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-04 04:25
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04L; H04L69/00; H04L69/22; H04L69/18; H04L69/24; H04L69/30; H04L69/32; H04L69/322; H04L69/326

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 27
Claim 1
Independent Claim 176 words
In a computer network, a system for communicating in a session between a first and a second application in a first and second computer system respectively, a plurality of successive messages may be passed in the session using a mixture of protocols, comprising: means for establishing a session between the first and second applications; means for determining whether a message meets a set of criteria; means for sending a first set of messages in the session in a first protocol which is both session oriented and connectionless, each of the first set of messages meeting the set of criteria; means for sending a second set of messages in the session in a second protocol which is both session oriented and connection oriented, the second set of messages being a set of messages which do not meet the set of criteria; and means for preventing messages which do not meet the set of criteria from being sent in the first protocol, whereby said plurality of messages using the first and second protocols are intermixed in the session.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 176 words
In a computer network, a system for communicating in a session between a first and a second application in a first and second computer system respectively, a plurality of successive messages may be passed in the session using a mixture of protocols, comprising: means for establishing a session between the first and second applications; means for determining whether a message meets a set of criteria; means for sending a first set of messages in the session in a first protocol which is both session oriented and connectionless, each of the first set of messages meeting the set of criteria; means for sending a second set of messages in the session in a second protocol which is both session oriented and connection oriented, the second set of messages being a set of messages which do not meet the set of criteria; and means for preventing messages which do not meet the set of criteria from being sent in the first protocol, whereby said plurality of messages using the first and second protocols are intermixed in the session.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 33 words
The system as recited in claim 1 which further comprises: means for determining whether the first protocol is supported by both nodes in the session prior to sending messages in the first protocol.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 86 words
The system as recited in claim 1 wherein one criterion needed to send messages by the first protocol is that the local area network is sufficiently reliable and which further comprises: means for determining whether the local area network is sufficiently reliable to send messages by the first protocol; and means responsive to a determination that the local area network is not sufficiently reliable for categorizing all messages in the session as belonging to the second set of messages to be sent in the second protocol.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 42 words
The system as recited in claim 3 which further comprises: means for disabling the means for sending messages in the first protocol if the local area network is not sufficiently reliable thereby sending all messages in the session by the second protocol.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 63 words
The system as recited in claim 4 which further comprises: means for requesting that the first protocol be used for messages in the session; means for directing a message which does not meet the set of criteria to the means for sending messages via the second protocol; and means for informing the requesting means when a message is sent in the second protocol.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 62 words
The system as recited in claim 1 which further comprises: means for building a predefined, invariant set of header information for the first protocol for the session; means for storing the header information for the first protocol; and, means for retrieving the header information for each of the first set of messages to be sent by the first protocol in the session.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 62 words
The system as recited in claim 1 which further comprises: means for storing a message sent in the first protocol at the first computer system; and responsive to a determination by the first application that the first message was apparently not received at the second computer system, means for requesting that the data be sent in a message in the second protocol.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 60 words
The system as recited in claim 1, wherein one criterion of the set of criteria is whether message can fit within one frame of the first protocol, and wherein in the session, messages which can fit in one frame are transmitted in the first protocol and messages which require more than one frame in are transmitted in the second protocol.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 22 words
The system as recited in claim 1, wherein one criterion of the set of criteria is a message type of prospective messages.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 169 words
In a computer network, a method for communicating in a session between a first and a second application in a first and second computer system respectively, a plurality of successive messages may be passed in the session using a mixture of protocols, comprising the steps of: establishing a session between the first and second applications; determining whether a message meets a set of criteria; sending a first set of messages in the session in a first protocol which is both session oriented and connectionless, each of the first set of messages meeting the set of criteria; sending a second set of messages in the session in a second protocol which is both session oriented and connection oriented, the second set of messages being a set of messages which do not meet the set of criteria; and preventing messages which do not meet the set of criteria from being sent in the first protocol, whereby said plurality of messages using the first and second protocols are intermixed in the session.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 169 words
In a computer network, a method for communicating in a session between a first and a second application in a first and second computer system respectively, a plurality of successive messages may be passed in the session using a mixture of protocols, comprising the steps of: establishing a session between the first and second applications; determining whether a message meets a set of criteria; sending a first set of messages in the session in a first protocol which is both session oriented and connectionless, each of the first set of messages meeting the set of criteria; sending a second set of messages in the session in a second protocol which is both session oriented and connection oriented, the second set of messages being a set of messages which do not meet the set of criteria; and preventing messages which do not meet the set of criteria from being sent in the first protocol, whereby said plurality of messages using the first and second protocols are intermixed in the session.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method as recited in claim 10 which further comprises the step of: determining whether the first protocol is supported by both nodes in the session prior to sending messages in the first protocol.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 50 words
The method as recited in claim 10 wherein one criterion needed to send messages by the first protocol is that the local area network is sufficiently reliable and which further comprises the step of: determining whether the local area network is sufficiently reliable to send messages by the first protocol.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method as recited in claim 12 which further comprises the step of: disabling the sending of messages in the first protocol if the local area network is not sufficiently reliable thereby sending all messages in the session by the second protocol.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 60 words
The method as recited in claim 10 which further comprises the steps of: requesting that the first protocol be used for messages in the session; directing a message which does not meet the set of criteria to the means for sending messages via the second protocol; and informing the requesting step when a message is sent in the second protocol.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 54 words
The method as recited in claim 10 which further comprises the steps of; building a predefined, invariant set of header information for the protocol for the session; storing the header information for the first protocol; and, retrieving the header information when a message is to be sent by the first protocol in the session.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 78 words
The method as recited in claim 10 which further comprises: storing a message sent in the first protocol at the first computer system; responsive to a determination by the first application that the first message was apparently not received at the second computer system, requesting that the data be sent in a message in the second protocol; and transmitting the data in a second protocol in the first session with the second node over the local area network.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 61 words
The method as recited in claim 10, wherein one criterion of the set of criteria is whether a message can fit within one frame of the first protocol, and wherein in the session, messages which can fit in one frame are transmitted in the first protocol and messages which require more than one frame in are transmitted in the second protocol.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method as recited in claim 10, wherein one criterion of the set of criteria is a message type of prospective messages.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 187 words
In a computer network, a computer program product on a computer readable medium for communicating in a session between a first and a second application in a first and second computer system respectively, a plurality of successive messages may be passed in the session using a mixture of first protocol and second protocol, comprising: means for establishing a session between the first and second applications; means for determining whether a message meets a set of criteria; means for sending a first set of messages in the session in a first protocol which is both session oriented and connectionless, each of the first set of messages meeting the set of criteria; means for sending a second set of messages in the session in a second protocol which is both session oriented and connection oriented, the second set of messages being a set of messages which do not meet the set of criteria; and means for preventing messages which do not meet the set of criteria from being sent in the first protocol, whereby said plurality of messages using the first and second protocols are intermixed in the session.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 187 words
In a computer network, a computer program product on a computer readable medium for communicating in a session between a first and a second application in a first and second computer system respectively, a plurality of successive messages may be passed in the session using a mixture of first protocol and second protocol, comprising: means for establishing a session between the first and second applications; means for determining whether a message meets a set of criteria; means for sending a first set of messages in the session in a first protocol which is both session oriented and connectionless, each of the first set of messages meeting the set of criteria; means for sending a second set of messages in the session in a second protocol which is both session oriented and connection oriented, the second set of messages being a set of messages which do not meet the set of criteria; and means for preventing messages which do not meet the set of criteria from being sent in the first protocol, whereby said plurality of messages using the first and second protocols are intermixed in the session.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 25 words
The computer program product as recited in claim 19 which further comprises; means for determining whether the protocol is supported in a current computer session.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 65 words
The computer program product as recited in claim 20 which further comprises; means for requesting that the first protocol be used for messages in the session; means for directing a message which does not meet the set of criteria to the means for sending messages via the second protocol; and means for informing the requesting means when a message is sent in the second protocol.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 87 words
The computer program product as recited in claim 19 wherein one criterion needed to send messages by the first protocol is that the local area network sufficiently reliable and which further comprises; means for determining whether the local area network is sufficiently reliable to send messages by the first protocol; and means responsive to a determination that the local area network is not sufficiently reliable for categorizing all messages in the session as belonging to the second set of messages to be sent in the second protocol.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 47 words
The computer program product as recited in claim 22 which further comprises: means for disabling the means for sending messages in the first protocol the first protocol if the local area network is not sufficiently reliable thereby sending all messages in the session by the second protocol.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 58 words
The computer program product as recited in claim 11 which further comprises; means for building a predefined, invariant set of header information for the first protocol for a particular computer session; means for storing the header information for the first protocol; and, means for retrieving the header information when a message is to be sent by the protocol.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4996685A Cited
US5163131A Cited
US5157662A Cited
US5202921A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2000-10-06 2001-04-07 2001-10-07 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2004-10-06 2005-04-07 2005-10-07 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2008-10-06 2009-04-07 2009-10-07 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag