US5661698A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for modelling the spatial distribution of geometric objects in an environment, such as faults in a geologic formation
Assignee: IFP Energies nouvelles
•
Filing: 1995-10-18
•
Granted: 1997-08-26
•
Expires: 2015-10-18
Abstract
Abstract A method for modelling a configuration of a fault network in a subsoil zone including a group of major faults detected by means of an exploration of the zone, by positioning also in the fault network, corresponding to an identical tectonic event, minor faults that have not been detected during the exploration is disclosed. The method includes analyzing the fault network to determine fractal characteristics thereof successively by randomly selecting minor faults and positioning each of the minor faults by determining a fractal dimension of the fault network and a density function defining a distribution of lengths of the faults; selecting a range of lengths of the faults by extrapolation of the defined distribution of the lengths of the faults; and successively randomly positioning the minor faults in the fault network and testing positioning thereof to check if the fault network with each of the positioned minor faults remains a fractal fault network.
Inventors
- 👤 Marie-Christine Cacas
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 01:26
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V3/00; G01V3/38; G01V1/00; G01V1/28; G01V1/282; G01V2210/00; G01V2210/60; G01V2210/66
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim
151 words
A method for modelling a configuration of a fault network in a subsoil zone including a group of major faults detected by means of an exploration of the zone, by positioning also in the fault network, corresponding to an identical tectonic event, minor faults that have not been detected during the exploration, the method comprising analyzing the fault network to determine fractal characteristics thereof successively by randomly selecting minor faults and positioning each of the minor faults by: determining a fractal dimension of the fault network and a density function defining a distribution of lengths of the faults; selecting a range of lengths of the faults by extrapolation of the defined distribution of the lengths of the faults; and successively randomly positioning the minor faults in the fault network and testing positioning thereof to check if the fault network with each of the positioned minor faults remains a fractal fault network.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
151 words
A method for modelling a configuration of a fault network in a subsoil zone including a group of major faults detected by means of an exploration of the zone, by positioning also in the fault network, corresponding to an identical tectonic event, minor faults that have not been detected during the exploration, the method comprising analyzing the fault network to determine fractal characteristics thereof successively by randomly selecting minor faults and positioning each of the minor faults by: determining a fractal dimension of the fault network and a density function defining a distribution of lengths of the faults; selecting a range of lengths of the faults by extrapolation of the defined distribution of the lengths of the faults; and successively randomly positioning the minor faults in the fault network and testing positioning thereof to check if the fault network with each of the positioned minor faults remains a fractal fault network.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising: giving an orientation to each minor fault which is determined as a function of a set of known orientation values at different points of the zone.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising: giving orientations to the minor faults which are determined as a function of orientations of major faults which are nearest to the minor faults.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as recited in claim 2 further comprising: giving orientations to the minor faults which are determined as a function of orientations of major faults which are nearest to the minor faults.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising: positioning each minor fault in a selected portion of the zone based upon random selection of a location of each minor fault.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method as recited in claim 2 further comprising: positioning each minor fault in a selected portion of the zone based upon random selection of a location of each minor fault.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method as recited in claim 3 further comprising: positioning each minor fault in a selected portion of the zone based upon random selection of a location of each minor fault.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method as recited in claim 4 further comprising: positioning each minor fault in a selected portion of the zone based upon random selection of a location of each minor fault.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
55 words
A method as recited in claim 5 wherein: the zone is subdivided into meshes, a probability is assigned to each mesh, a mesh is randomly selected from all meshes according to a probability density function of each of the meshes, and coordinates of positioned points (xi, yi) in the randomly selected mesh are randomly selected.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
55 words
A method as recited in claim 6 wherein: the zone is subdivided into meshes, a probability is assigned to each mesh, a mesh is randomly selected from all meshes according to a probability density function of each of the meshes, and coordinates of positioned points (xi, yi) in the randomly selected mesh are randomly selected.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
55 words
A method as recited in claim 7 wherein: the zone is subdivided into meshes, a probability is assigned to each mesh, a mesh is randomly selected from all meshes according to a probability density function of each of the meshes, and coordinates of positioned points (xi, yi) in the randomly selected mesh are randomly selected.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
55 words
A method as recited in claim 8 wherein: the zone is subdivided into meshes, a probability is assigned to each mesh, a mesh is randomly selected from all meshes according to a probability density function of each of the meshes, and coordinates of positioned points (xi, yi) in the randomly selected mesh are randomly selected.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as recited in claim 9 wherein: the random selection of each mesh is performed for each minor fault successively by a random selection of length, a site selection and a trace determination as a function of the randomly selected length of a selected site and of local orientations to be observed.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as recited in claim 10 wherein: the random selection of each mesh is performed for each minor fault successively by a random selection of length, a site selection and a trace determination as a function of the randomly selected length of a selected site and of local orientations to be observed.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as recited in claim 11 wherein: the random selection of each mesh is performed for each minor fault successively by a random selection of length, a site selection and a trace determination as a function of the randomly selected length of a selected site and of local orientations to be observed.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as recited in claim 12 wherein: the random selection of each mesh is performed for each minor fault successively by a random selection of length, a site selection and a trace determination as a function of the randomly selected length of a selected site and of local orientations to be observed.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4972383A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-08-25 | 2001-02-24 | 2001-08-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-08-25 | 2005-02-24 | 2005-08-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-08-25 | 2009-02-24 | 2009-08-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |