Patent JPS568914A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5657400A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Automatic identification and correction of bad pixels in a large area solid state x-ray detector

Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1995-01-31
•
Granted: 1997-08-12
•
Expires: 2015-01-31
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method for identifying and correcting bad pixels in an x-ray image produced by a large area solid state x-ray detector is disclosed. Initially, each bad pixel is identified. An appropriate correction scheme is then selected from a predetermined list. A correction code is then assigned to each bad pixel, the correction code corresponding to the selected correction scheme. The correction code is stored in a pixel-correction memory, and the correction code for each pixel is read during imaging. Finally, each bad pixel value found during the correction code reading is replaced using the selected correction scheme, and can be immediately displayed.

Inventors

  • 👤 Paul R. Granfors
  • 👤 Jean Claude Morvan

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 07:23
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T5/00; G06T5/20; H; H04; H04N; H04N25/00; H04N25/30; H04N25/60; H04N25/68

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim 164 words
A method for identifying and correcting bad pixels in an x-ray image produced by a large area solid state x-ray detector, comprising the steps of: identifying as bad each pixel with a gain lying outside a range that can be corrected with available readout electronics, including acquiring an average of multiple images without x-ray exposure, acquiring an average of multiple images with a flat-field x-ray exposure, subtracting the average image without exposure from the average image with exposure, removing a low spatial frequency background from the subtracted image, and identifying bad pixels in the resulting image as those with relatively larger absolute values; selecting an appropriate correction from a predetermined list; assigning a correction code to each bad pixel, the correction code corresponding to the selected correction; storing the correction code in a pixel correction memory; reading the correction code for each pixel during imaging; replacing each bad pixel value, as indicated by reading the correction code, using the selected correction, for immediate display.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 164 words
A method for identifying and correcting bad pixels in an x-ray image produced by a large area solid state x-ray detector, comprising the steps of: identifying as bad each pixel with a gain lying outside a range that can be corrected with available readout electronics, including acquiring an average of multiple images without x-ray exposure, acquiring an average of multiple images with a flat-field x-ray exposure, subtracting the average image without exposure from the average image with exposure, removing a low spatial frequency background from the subtracted image, and identifying bad pixels in the resulting image as those with relatively larger absolute values; selecting an appropriate correction from a predetermined list; assigning a correction code to each bad pixel, the correction code corresponding to the selected correction; storing the correction code in a pixel correction memory; reading the correction code for each pixel during imaging; replacing each bad pixel value, as indicated by reading the correction code, using the selected correction, for immediate display.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 39 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of identifying each bad pixel comprises the step of identifying as bad a pixel with an offset lying outside a range that can be corrected with available readout electronics.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 58 words
A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the step of identifying as bad a pixel with an offset lying outside a range that can be corrected comprises the steps of: acquiring an average of multiple images without x-ray exposure; and identifying pixels in this image lying outside the range that can be corrected with available readout electronics.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 41 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of removing a low spatial frequency background comprises the steps of: filtering the subtracted image with a suitable smoothing filter; and subtracting the filtered image from the image prior to filtering.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 15 words
A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the smoothing filter comprises a median filter.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 24 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the predetermined list comprises replacement of the bad pixel by various combinations of neighboring pixel values.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 41 words
A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the various combinations comprise an average of two nearest neighboring pixel values, an average of two next-nearest neighboring pixel values, a single nearest neighboring pixel value, and a single next-nearest neighboring pixel value.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 52 words
A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the step of selecting an appropriate correction comprises the steps of: analyzing nearest and next-nearest neighboring pixels of the bad pixel to determine a set of good pixels; selecting a correction from the predetermined list, based on pixels in the set of good pixels.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 20 words
A method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising the step of assigning a good code to every good pixel.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 21 words
A method as claimed in claim 9 further comprising the step of storing the good code in the pixel correction memory.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4287536A Cited
US4314281A Cited
US4920428A Cited
US5120950A Cited
US5047863A Cited
US5514865A Cited
US5499114A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2000-08-11 2001-02-10 2001-08-12 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2004-08-11 2005-02-10 2005-08-12 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2008-08-11 2009-02-10 2009-08-12 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag