US5631640A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Threat avoidance system and method for aircraft
Assignee: Honeywell Inc
•
Filing: 1995-02-21
•
Granted: 1997-05-20
•
Expires: 2015-02-21
Abstract
Abstract A computer-based process for rapidly responding to previously unknown threats to airborne aircraft. The process makes quick, automatic decisions when required for close-range threats, yet provides the aircraft operator an opportunity to choose the appropriate response when time permits.
Inventors
- 👤 David L. Deis
- 👤 Robert M. Gjullin
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 04:33
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01C; G01C21/00; G01C21/005; F; F41; F41G; F41G7/00; F41G7/34; F41G7/343; G05; G05D; G05D1/00; G05D1/02; G05D1/0202
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim
165 words
A computerized method for an airborne aircraft to respond to an unknown threat where the aircraft detects a previously unknown threat, comprising the following steps: determining a zone of intervisibility for the previously unknown threat; determining if an aircraft's planned route intersects the zone of intervisibility with the threat; if not, maintaining the aircraft's planned route; if intersection of aircraft's planned route with the zone of intervisibility is less than a predetermined distance from the aircraft, automatically executing a lateral route change; if intersection of aircraft's planned route with the zone of intervisibility is greater than the predetermined distance from the aircraft, notifying an aircraft operator of the threat and checking the threat against set clearance levels to determine if the aircraft's planned route may be followed at another acceptable set clearance level; and if another acceptable set clearance level is found, permitting the operator to choose between following the aircraft's planned route at said acceptable set clearance level or choosing the lateral route change.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
165 words
A computerized method for an airborne aircraft to respond to an unknown threat where the aircraft detects a previously unknown threat, comprising the following steps: determining a zone of intervisibility for the previously unknown threat; determining if an aircraft's planned route intersects the zone of intervisibility with the threat; if not, maintaining the aircraft's planned route; if intersection of aircraft's planned route with the zone of intervisibility is less than a predetermined distance from the aircraft, automatically executing a lateral route change; if intersection of aircraft's planned route with the zone of intervisibility is greater than the predetermined distance from the aircraft, notifying an aircraft operator of the threat and checking the threat against set clearance levels to determine if the aircraft's planned route may be followed at another acceptable set clearance level; and if another acceptable set clearance level is found, permitting the operator to choose between following the aircraft's planned route at said acceptable set clearance level or choosing the lateral route change.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
60 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of executing a route change comprises: calculating a startpoint for the route change; determining the next waypoint in the planned route beyond the startpoint; and if the next waypoint is less than a predetermined distance from the aircraft, choosing a waypoint following the next waypoint as an endpoint for the route change.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the step of executing a route change further includes: if the next waypoint is greater than the predetermined distance from the aircraft, choosing the next waypoint as the endpoint for the route change, unless a threat's intervisibility also intersects the route planned between the next waypoint and the following waypoint.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 including: if no acceptable set clearance level is found, automatically executing a route change.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
162 words
A system for an airborne aircraft to respond to an unknown threat where the aircraft detects a previously unknown threat, comprising: means for determining a zone of intervisibility for the previously unknown threat; means for determining if an aircraft's planned route intersects a zone of intervisibility with the threat and for responding as follows: if not, maintaining the aircraft's planned route; if intersection of aircraft's planned route with the zone of intervisibility is less than a predetermined distance from the aircraft, automatically executing a lateral route change; if the intersection is greater than the predetermined distance from the aircraft, notifying an aircraft operator of the threat and checking the threat against set clearance levels to determine if the aircraft's planned route may be followed at another, acceptable set clearance level; and if an acceptable set clearance level is found, permitting the operator to change between following the aircraft's planned route at said acceptable set clearance level or choosing the lateral route change.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
162 words
A system for an airborne aircraft to respond to an unknown threat where the aircraft detects a previously unknown threat, comprising: means for determining a zone of intervisibility for the previously unknown threat; means for determining if an aircraft's planned route intersects a zone of intervisibility with the threat and for responding as follows: if not, maintaining the aircraft's planned route; if intersection of aircraft's planned route with the zone of intervisibility is less than a predetermined distance from the aircraft, automatically executing a lateral route change; if the intersection is greater than the predetermined distance from the aircraft, notifying an aircraft operator of the threat and checking the threat against set clearance levels to determine if the aircraft's planned route may be followed at another, acceptable set clearance level; and if an acceptable set clearance level is found, permitting the operator to change between following the aircraft's planned route at said acceptable set clearance level or choosing the lateral route change.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3668403A
Cited
US4063073A
Cited
US4760396A
Cited
US4812990A
Cited
US4862373A
Cited
US4914733A
Cited
US4903216A
Cited
US4882590A
Cited
US5058024A
Cited
US5086396A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-05-19 | 2000-11-18 | 2001-05-20 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-05-19 | 2004-11-18 | 2005-05-20 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-05-19 | 2008-11-18 | 2009-05-20 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |