Patent US5611042A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5629862A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Rule-based procedure for automatic selection of contingencies in evaluation of dynamic security of a power distribution system
Assignee: Electric Power Research Institute
•
Filing: 1994-08-30
•
Granted: 1997-05-13
•
Expires: 2014-08-30
Abstract
Abstract Dynamic security analysis of a power system is divided into several diverse sub-problems, including sub-problems that may be analyzed using artificial intelligence ("AI") technology. A rule-based topological analysis procedure distinguishes between outage contingencies that are definitely safe or harmless to the integrity of the power system, and potentially severe outage contingencies that are harmful to the power system. Initial outage selection correctly relates the state of the power system before the analysis. By methodically and automatically identifying potentially severe outages, the need for extensive off-line studies based on time domain simulations is avoided, thus promoting computational efficiency. This methodology further provides automatic detection of critical interfaces, e.g., flows through which may significantly impact the post-contingency state of the power system.
Inventors
- 👤 Vladimir Brandwajn
- 👤 Ali Ipakchi
- 👤 A. B. Ranjit Kumar
- 👤 Gerald W. Cauley
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 08:47
CPC Classifications
H; H02; H02J; H02J3/00; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S706/00; Y10S706/902; Y10S706/911; Y10S706/914; Y10S706/915
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
227 words
A method for selecting fault contingencies to be evaluated in a real-time determination of their effects upon the dynamic security of a power system that includes power generators and power-carrying lines, the method comprising the following steps: (a) defining a full set of potential contingencies for said power system; and (b) using a computer system to apply a rule set including at least one interface rule to said full set to determine at least one sub-set thereof, said subset identifying contingencies that are potentially unstable to said power system; wherein said interface rule governs a cut-set defined by the following steps: (c) representing said power system as a collection of network nodes having inter-node connections represented as interconnecting arcs, wherein said network nodes are spatially identified such that power flow of said power system in any said arc goes from a first direction toward a second direction; (d) defining a said cut-set as a set of said interconnecting arcs that when removed from a connected said network separates said network into at least two second unconnected parts; (e) defining from a set of each said cut-set a minimal cut-set, wherein a said minimal cut-set is a cutset such that a subset set of said minimal cut-set arcs is not itself a cutset; and (f) arriving at a minimal cut-set that is not a subset of another cut-set.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
227 words
A method for selecting fault contingencies to be evaluated in a real-time determination of their effects upon the dynamic security of a power system that includes power generators and power-carrying lines, the method comprising the following steps: (a) defining a full set of potential contingencies for said power system; and (b) using a computer system to apply a rule set including at least one interface rule to said full set to determine at least one sub-set thereof, said subset identifying contingencies that are potentially unstable to said power system; wherein said interface rule governs a cut-set defined by the following steps: (c) representing said power system as a collection of network nodes having inter-node connections represented as interconnecting arcs, wherein said network nodes are spatially identified such that power flow of said power system in any said arc goes from a first direction toward a second direction; (d) defining a said cut-set as a set of said interconnecting arcs that when removed from a connected said network separates said network into at least two second unconnected parts; (e) defining from a set of each said cut-set a minimal cut-set, wherein a said minimal cut-set is a cutset such that a subset set of said minimal cut-set arcs is not itself a cutset; and (f) arriving at a minimal cut-set that is not a subset of another cut-set.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
105 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said rule set includes at least one power-carrying line rule identifying as significant a line outage when at least one condition is present selected from the group consisting of (i) real line power exceeds a predetermined threshold for real line power, (ii) apparent line power exceeds a predetermined threshold for apparent line power, (iii) reactive line power exceeds a predetermined threshold for reactive line power, (iv) a ratio of reactive line power to real line power exceeds a predetermined threshold for reactive-to-real line power ratio, and (v) phase angle across a line exceeds a predetermined threshold for phase angle.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 2, wherein at least one said threshold is predetermined by a human expert.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
125 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said rule set includes at least one power-carrying bus rule identifying as significant a bus outage when at least one condition is present selected from the group consisting of (i) total power flow toward a bus exceeds a predetermined threshold for total power flow, (ii) total power flow away from a bus exceeds a predetermined threshold for total power flow, (iii) total real bus load exceeds a predetermined bus total real load threshold, (iv) total reactive bus load exceeds a predetermined bus total reactive load threshold, (v) total real generation of the bus exceeds a predetermined threshold for total real bus generation, and (vi) total reactive generation of the bus exceeds a predetermined threshold for total reactive bus generation.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 4, wherein at least one said threshold is predetermined by a human expert.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said at least one interface rule identifies as significant an outage in said interface.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
107 words
The method of claim 6, wherein said at least one interface rule identifies as significant an outage in said interface when at least one condition is present selected from the group consisting of (i) a relative ratio between power to an interface and power generation in a sending area of said interface, (ii) a relative ratio between power to an interface and load in a receiving area of said interface, (iii) a relative ratio of power to an interface and inertia in a sending area of said interface, and (iv) a relative ratio of power to an interface and inertia in a receiving area of said interface.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 7, wherein at least one said ratio is predetermined by a human expert.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 1, wherein only contingencies identified in said at least one sub-set at step (b) are subjected to further evaluation to determine their effects upon said power system.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
106 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said at least one interface rule identifies as significant an outage in said interface based upon at least one condition selected from the group consisting of (i) a relative ratio between power to an interface and power generation in a sending area of said interface, (ii) a relative ratio between power to an interface and load in a receiving area of said interface, (iii) a relative ratio of power to an interface and inertia in a sending area of said interface, and (iv) a relative ratio of power to an interface and inertia in a receiving area of said interface.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 1, wherein a said minimal cut-set is iteratively determined.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1, wherein step (f) includes repeating steps (c), (d), and (e) iteratively until no remaining cut-set is a subset of another cut-set.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3833927A
Cited
US4644479A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-05-12 | 2000-11-11 | 2001-05-13 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-05-12 | 2004-11-11 | 2005-05-13 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-05-12 | 2008-11-11 | 2009-05-13 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |