US5606587A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Determination of direct x-ray exposure regions in digital medical imaging
Assignee: Carestream Health Inc
•
Filing: 1996-03-21
•
Granted: 1997-02-25
•
Expires: 2016-03-21
Abstract
Abstract A method of determining direct x-ray exposure regions in digital medical imaging comprising the steps of: providing a digital medical image including a matrix of lines and columns of pixels; evaluating significant transitions in line and column profiles to determine appropriate line and column thresholds; evaluating all pixels which exceed the line/column threshold for structure by computing the variation within a moving window using a range statistic; accumulating within a histogram pixels which exceed a threshold for that particular line or column and which contain variation indicative of direct x-ray exposure; and analyzing the background histogram to determine the beginning intensity or code value (left point) of the background region.
Inventors
- 👤 Lori L. Barski
- 👤 Robert A. Senn
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 11:41
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/10; G06T7/11; G06T7/136; G06T7/194; G06T2207/00; G06T2207/10; G06T2207/10116; G06T2207/30; G06T2207/30004
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
110 words
A method of determining direct x-ray exposure regions in digital medical imaging comprising the steps of: providing a digital medical image including a matrix of lines and columns of pixels; evaluating significant transitions in line and column profiles to determine appropriate line and column thresholds; evaluating all pixels which exceed the line/column threshold for structure by computing the variation within a moving window using a range statistic; accumulating within a histogram pixels which exceed a threshold for that particular line or column and which contain variation indicative of direct x-ray exposure; and analyzing the background histogram to determine the beginning intensity or code value (left point) of the background region.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
110 words
A method of determining direct x-ray exposure regions in digital medical imaging comprising the steps of: providing a digital medical image including a matrix of lines and columns of pixels; evaluating significant transitions in line and column profiles to determine appropriate line and column thresholds; evaluating all pixels which exceed the line/column threshold for structure by computing the variation within a moving window using a range statistic; accumulating within a histogram pixels which exceed a threshold for that particular line or column and which contain variation indicative of direct x-ray exposure; and analyzing the background histogram to determine the beginning intensity or code value (left point) of the background region.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said first evaluating step includes determining the threshold as the lowest of all the transition peaks found in the line or column.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said first evaluating step includes determining the lowest transition peak as a floor threshold.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 2 wherein in said first evaluating step no candidate transitions are determined, using as a threshold a preselected percentage of the average of transition peaks of all the significant transitions.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said preselected percentage is about 95%.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
65 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said second evaluating step, for each line and column, the high and low code values are found and if the range is less than a preselected value, the next line or column is processed, but if otherwise a range statistic is utilized to characterize the variation in pixels using a moving window which contains pixel exceeding the threshold.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
76 words
The method of claim 6 wherein a pixel is determined to be background using the following formula ##EQU2## where x R is the range over n samples, d n is a constant which defines the relationship of the range to standard deviation, d n =μ R /σ x ; z is the index into the noise array which is chosen to be the high code value of the range; and σ z is the system noise.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1 wherein after said accumulating step, said histogram is smoothed by a Gaussian function and normalized by the highest peak to a value of one.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 1 including the step of determining the right point of the histogram, determining the difference between the right point code value and the last code value of the gray level histogram, and if this difference is large, assuming that there is no direct x-ray exposure.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 1 wherein a determination is made that there is no background if one of the following conditions is determined; if the width of the peak as defined by the left and right points is large; if the distance from the peak to the last code values of the gray level histogram is large; if less than five significant transitions are found in said image.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 including the step of creating a spatial segmentation mask which cab be applied to said original image.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said step of creating includes the steps of performing a first histogram analysis for only some of said lines, and identifying pixels which demonstrate proper noise characteristics indicative of background and which exceed the threshold of the beginning code value of the direct x-ray exposure region of the histogram analysis.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said step of creating includes the steps of marking all the pixels from said accumulating step which are candidates based upon transition and noise characteristics, and their setting marked pixels which are less than the beginning code value of the direct x-ray exposure region back to their original value.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2000-02-25 | 2000-08-26 | 2001-02-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2004-02-25 | 2004-08-26 | 2005-02-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2008-02-25 | 2008-08-26 | 2009-02-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |