US5589749A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Closed loop control system and method using back EMF estimator
Assignee: Honeywell Inc
•
Filing: 1994-08-31
•
Granted: 1996-12-31
•
Expires: 2014-08-31
Abstract
Abstract A feedback control system which uses estimated back electromotive force(EMF) from a controlled actuator to provide feedback into the control system and improve control of the actuator. Back EMF is estimated from current through the actuator and voltage across the actuator. The estimated back EMF signal is fed back into the control system where it serves as a rate term. In the preferred embodiment the back EMF signal is used in combination with an actuator position signal which is also feedback into the control system. A complementary filter conditions both the rate and position signals for improved performance. The invention is particularly suited for controlling linear actuators which do not provide conventional rate feedback signals.
Inventors
- 👤 Dale D. Davidson
- 👤 Hamid R. Sadeghpour
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 10:08
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B19/00; G05B19/02; G05B19/18; G05B19/19; G05B19/33; G05B19/35; G05B19/351; G05B19/358; G05B2219/00; G05B2219/30; G05B2219/37; G05B2219/37133; G05B2219/37317; G05B2219/39; G05B2219/39311
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 28
Claim 1
Independent Claim
253 words
A feedback control system for controlling an actuator in response to a command signal, said control system comprising: a) a first input for receiving said command signal; b) a second input for receiving a current signal indicative of the current through said actuator; c) a third input for receiving a voltage signal indicative of the voltage across said actuator; d) a fourth input for receiving a position signal indicative of the position of said actuator; e) a back EMF combiner having, 1) a first input in communication with said current signal, 2) a second input in communication with said voltage signal, and, 3) an output communicating a rate signal indicative of the rate of movement of said actuator; f) a position command combiner having, 1) a first input in communication with said command signal, 2) a second input in communication with said position signal, and, 3) an output communicating a position displacement signal indicative of the difference between the signals received by said first input and said second input; g) a displacement combiner having, 1) a first input in communication with said displacement signal, 2) a second input in communication with said rate signal, and, 3) an output communicating a rate error signal indicative of the difference between the signals received by said first input and said second input; and, h) a filter, interposed between said back EMF combiner and said second input of said displacement combiner, said filter conditioning said rate signal so as to minimize the effect of motor impedance variations.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
253 words
A feedback control system for controlling an actuator in response to a command signal, said control system comprising: a) a first input for receiving said command signal; b) a second input for receiving a current signal indicative of the current through said actuator; c) a third input for receiving a voltage signal indicative of the voltage across said actuator; d) a fourth input for receiving a position signal indicative of the position of said actuator; e) a back EMF combiner having, 1) a first input in communication with said current signal, 2) a second input in communication with said voltage signal, and, 3) an output communicating a rate signal indicative of the rate of movement of said actuator; f) a position command combiner having, 1) a first input in communication with said command signal, 2) a second input in communication with said position signal, and, 3) an output communicating a position displacement signal indicative of the difference between the signals received by said first input and said second input; g) a displacement combiner having, 1) a first input in communication with said displacement signal, 2) a second input in communication with said rate signal, and, 3) an output communicating a rate error signal indicative of the difference between the signals received by said first input and said second input; and, h) a filter, interposed between said back EMF combiner and said second input of said displacement combiner, said filter conditioning said rate signal so as to minimize the effect of motor impedance variations.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
16 words
The feedback control system according to claim 1 wherein said filter is a complimentary type filter.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
19 words
The feedback control system according to claim 2 wherein said filter includes an input for receiving said position signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
25 words
The feedback control system according to claim 3 wherein said complementary filter includes an output communicating a conditioned position signal to said position command combiner.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
17 words
The feedback control system according to claim 4 further comprising an LVDT which generates said position signal.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
15 words
The feedback control system according to claim 5 wherein said actuator is a linear actuator.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
18 words
The feedback control system according to claim 6 wherein said actuator controls a control surface of an aircraft.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
18 words
The feedback control system according to claim 7 wherein said actuator controls the yaw damper of an aircraft.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
154 words
A closed loop digital control system controlling an actuator having an electrical motor, said control system receiving a position command representative of a desired actuator position and generating an actuator command in response thereof, said control system comprising: a) current feedback means for generating a digital current signal representative of the electric current through said actuator; b) voltage feedback means for generating a digital voltage signal representative of the voltage across said actuator; c) back EMF combining means, in communication with said current signal and said voltage signal, for generating a rate signal representative of the rate of movement of said actuator; d) displacement combining means, in communication with said position command and said rate signal, for generating a rate error signal; and, e) filter means, interposed between said back EMF combining means and said displacement combining means, for conditioning said rate signal such that motor impedance variation of said electric motor is minimized.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
154 words
A closed loop digital control system controlling an actuator having an electrical motor, said control system receiving a position command representative of a desired actuator position and generating an actuator command in response thereof, said control system comprising: a) current feedback means for generating a digital current signal representative of the electric current through said actuator; b) voltage feedback means for generating a digital voltage signal representative of the voltage across said actuator; c) back EMF combining means, in communication with said current signal and said voltage signal, for generating a rate signal representative of the rate of movement of said actuator; d) displacement combining means, in communication with said position command and said rate signal, for generating a rate error signal; and, e) filter means, interposed between said back EMF combining means and said displacement combining means, for conditioning said rate signal such that motor impedance variation of said electric motor is minimized.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
70 words
The closed loop digital control system according to claim 9 further comprising, a) position means for generating a position signal indicative of the position of said actuator; and, b) position command combining means, having a first input in communication with said position command and a second input in communication with said position signal, for generating a displacement signal indicative of the difference between said position command and said position signal.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
29 words
The closed loop digital control system according to claim 10 wherein said filter means is a complimentary type filter having a second input in communication with said position signal.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
36 words
The closed loop digital control system according to claim 11 wherein said filter means has a conditioned position signal output and wherein said conditioned position signal output is in communication with said position command combining means.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
21 words
The closed loop digital control system according to claim 12 wherein said current feedback means includes a first dual pole filter.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
20 words
The closed loop digital control system according to claim 13 wherein said position means includes a linear variable differential transformer.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
25 words
The closed loop digital control system according to claim 14 wherein said closed loop control system controls at least one control surface of an aircraft.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
21 words
The closed loop digital control system according to claim 15 wherein said control system controls a yaw damper of an aircraft.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
21 words
The closed loop digital control system according to claim 13 wherein said voltage feedback means includes a second dual pole filter.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
34 words
The closed loop digital control system according to claim 13 wherein said position means includes a demodulator coupled to a low pass filter for condition said position signal prior conversion to a digital signal.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
88 words
A closed loop control method for controlling an actuator using estimated back electromotive force comprising the steps of: a) providing a current signal indicative of electrical current through said actuator; b) providing a voltage signal indicative of voltage across said actuator; c) combining said current signal and said voltage signal to form a rate signal indicative of the rate of movement of said actuator; d) conditioning said rate signal to diminish the effect of motor impedance variation; and, e) feeding said rate signal back into said control system.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
88 words
A closed loop control method for controlling an actuator using estimated back electromotive force comprising the steps of: a) providing a current signal indicative of electrical current through said actuator; b) providing a voltage signal indicative of voltage across said actuator; c) combining said current signal and said voltage signal to form a rate signal indicative of the rate of movement of said actuator; d) conditioning said rate signal to diminish the effect of motor impedance variation; and, e) feeding said rate signal back into said control system.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
35 words
The closed loop control method according to claim 19 wherein the step of combining said current signal includes the step of multiplying said current signal by a value representative of the impedance of said actuator.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
40 words
The closed loop control method according to claim 20 wherein the step of feeding said rate signal back into said control system includes the step of combining said rate signal with a displacement signal to generate a rate error signal.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
42 words
The closed loop control method according to claim 21 further comprising the steps of: a) providing a position signal indicative of the position of said actuator; and, b) combining said position signal with a position command signal to generate said displacement signal.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
30 words
The closed loop control method according to claim 19 wherein the step of conditioning said rate signal uses a complementary filter which has a second input for said position signal.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
28 words
The closed loop control method according to claim 23 wherein the step of filtering uses a complementary filter having a second input in communication with said rate signal.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
16 words
The closed loop control method according to claim 24 wherein said actuator is a linear actuator.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3593092A
Cited
US3640183A
Cited
US3679956A
Cited
US3800588A
Cited
US4150803A
Cited
US4209734A
Cited
US4382283A
Cited
US4338555A
Cited
US4594537A
Cited
US4697768A
Cited
US4679103A
Cited
US4797829A
Cited
US4764711A
Cited
US5006775A
Cited
US5020125A
Cited
US5076517A
Cited
US5015934A
Cited
US5155422A
Cited
US5220259A
Cited
US5367237A
Cited
US5264768A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-12-31 | 2000-07-01 | 2000-12-31 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-12-31 | 2004-07-01 | 2004-12-31 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-12-31 | 2008-07-01 | 2008-12-31 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |