US5580791A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Assay of water pollutants
Assignee: BTG International Ltd
•
Filing: 1995-05-24
•
Granted: 1996-12-03
•
Expires: 2015-05-24
Abstract
Abstract A method of assay of antioxidant activity of a sample of water, which comprises monitoring the change exerted by the sample on a luminescent reaction.
Inventors
- 👤 Gary H. G. H. Thorpe
- 👤 Thomas P. Whitehead
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 22:22
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/75; G01N21/76; G01N33/00; G01N33/18; G01N33/1826; G01N33/1846; Y; Y02; Y02A; Y02A20/00; Y02A20/20
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
164 words
A method of assay of biological or chemical quality, in terms of antioxidant capacity, of a sample of water suspected to contain pollutants having an antioxidant capacity, which method comprises the steps of: (1) carrying out a control, enzyme-catalyzed chemiluminescent action in a reaction mixture containing a chemical species starting material for said control reaction and measuring a level of chemiluminescence thereby generated; (2) initiating and carrying out the same chemiluminescent reaction in the same reaction mixture to which said sample suspected to contain pollutants having an antioxidant capacity is added prior to or during said reaction, said chemiluminescent reaction generating a level of chemiluminescence whereby, when said sample is polluted, addition of said sample to said chemiluminescent reaction causes a reduction in said level of luminescence compared with the level of chemiluminescence generated by said control chemiluminescence reaction; (3) monitoring said reduction in level of chemiluminescence, and (4) determining the water quality in terms of antioxidant capacity from said reduced level of chemiluminescence.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
164 words
A method of assay of biological or chemical quality, in terms of antioxidant capacity, of a sample of water suspected to contain pollutants having an antioxidant capacity, which method comprises the steps of: (1) carrying out a control, enzyme-catalyzed chemiluminescent action in a reaction mixture containing a chemical species starting material for said control reaction and measuring a level of chemiluminescence thereby generated; (2) initiating and carrying out the same chemiluminescent reaction in the same reaction mixture to which said sample suspected to contain pollutants having an antioxidant capacity is added prior to or during said reaction, said chemiluminescent reaction generating a level of chemiluminescence whereby, when said sample is polluted, addition of said sample to said chemiluminescent reaction causes a reduction in said level of luminescence compared with the level of chemiluminescence generated by said control chemiluminescence reaction; (3) monitoring said reduction in level of chemiluminescence, and (4) determining the water quality in terms of antioxidant capacity from said reduced level of chemiluminescence.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
49 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said reduced level of chemiluminescence is measured at a pre-determined time or during a predetermined time period or from the time period elapsed after initiation of the reaction or addition of the sample until a pre-determined reduced level of luminescence is obtained.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
114 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the sample is added prior to initiation of said reaction, so that after initiation, the level of luminescence observed is reduced for a period of time, after which said level recovers to a substantially constant but still reduced level of luminescence and said reduction in the level of luminescence is measured after a pre-determined amount of time has elapsed from the time of initiation of the reaction, and is compared to a similar measurement of level of luminescence made on a said control reaction, the difference in level of luminescence between the sample and the control being an index of the antioxidant capacity of the sample.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
41 words
A method according to claim 3, in which the time period from the time of initiation until the substantially constant level of luminescence is observed, is measured and wherein the measurement is an index of the antioxidant capacity of the sample.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the sample is added to a progressing luminescent reaction.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
91 words
A method according to claim 5, in which the luminescent reaction is carried out so that the level of luminescence rises to a plateau at which it remains substantially constant and said sample is added at said level or at a time when the level of luminescence is rising and is within 10% of reaching said substantially constant level, and said sample is added in an amount effective to cause a reduction in the level of luminescence, which is followed by a recovery to a substantially constant but still reduced level.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method according to claim 6, in which the time interval between the time when the sample is added and a pre-determined level of recovery is measured.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
44 words
A method according to claim 6, in which the level of recovery of luminescence at a given time interval from the time when the sample is added is measured and compared with the level of luminescence at the time when the sample was added.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
42 words
A method according to claim 8 in which the level of recovery of luminescence is measured after a time interval from when the sample is added and compared with the level of luminescence of the control reaction after the same time interval.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
100 words
A method of determining a change in biological or chemical quality, in terms of antioxidant capacity, of water suspected to contain pollutants having an antioxidant capacity, which method comprises the steps of: carrying out a method of assay according to claim 1 on a sample of water; removing specific antioxidant or particular classes of antioxidants from said water; repeating the chemiluminescent reaction in the same reaction mixture, to which is added a sample of said water from which said antioxidant or antioxidants have been removed, thereby generating a new level of chemiluminescence and comparing the results of these two assays.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the sample is sewage, river, sea water, reservoir, tap or industrial waste water.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the chemiluminescent reaction is a peroxidase-catalyzed oxygen-dependent chemiluminescent reaction.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method according to claim 12 in which the chemiluminescent reaction comprises the reaction of a peroxidase, an oxidant and a dihydrophthalazinedione (DPD) in the presence of an enhancer.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
15 words
A method according to claim 13, in which the enhancer is para-iodophenol or para-hydroxycinnamic acid.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3359973A
Cited
GB1542155A
Cited
EP0116454A2
Cited
US4729950A
Cited
US4643835A
Cited
US4835101A
Cited
US5043266A
Cited
US5055397A
Cited
US5116759A
Cited
US5209934A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-12-03 | 2000-06-03 | 2000-12-03 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-12-03 | 2004-06-03 | 2004-12-03 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-12-03 | 2008-06-03 | 2008-12-03 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |