US5574469A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Locomotive collision avoidance method and system
Assignee: BNSF Railway Co
•
Filing: 1994-12-21
•
Granted: 1996-11-12
•
Expires: 2014-12-21
Abstract
Abstract A method and system are disclosed for improved collision avoidance of two locomotives by periodically receiving on each locomotive digitally encoded data to determine its geographical location, speed and direction of travel by means of an onboard global positioning system receiver. A first data frame including this data is created on each locomotive. Each locomotive periodically broadcasts to the other digitally encoded signals containing the first data frame. A second data frame is created on each locomotive from the received digital signals from the other locomotive containing the second locomotive's geographical location, speed and direction of travel and locomotive identification. The data frames are processed and displayed onboard each locomotive to determine if the other is a collision candidate. If so, collision avoidance procedures are automatically initiated, including initiation of aural and visual alarms at a first selected distance and the reduction of speed at a second selected, closer distance. The speed reduction includes the application of the locomotive and/or train brakes and throttle reduction to arrest locomotive or train movement to complete cessation. The identity of each locomotive is established with an onboard operator input device and broadcast with other of the digitally encoded data.
Inventors
- 👤 George C. C. Hsu
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 05:23
CPC Classifications
B; B61; B61L; B61L23/00; B61L23/34; G; G01; G01S; G01S5/00; G01S5/0009; G01S5/0018; G01S5/0027; G01S5/0072
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
183 words
A method of locomotive collision avoidance between two locomotives and associated trains operating in railway system, comprising: periodically receiving on each locomotive digitally encoded data from a global positioning satellite system; creating a first data frame in each locomotive containing its identity, geographical location, speed and direction of travel; broadcasting from each locomotive digitally encoded signals containing its respective first data frame; receiving in each locomotive the first data frame from the other locomotive as a second data frame; processing said first and second data frames in a first locomotive to determine if a second locomotive is a collision candidate; initiating collision avoidance measure if the second locomotive is determining to be a collision candidate by: initiating both an audio and visual warning within the first locomotive when said locomotives are separated by less than a selected distance; permitting the audio alarm to be reset only after intiation of voice communication with the second locomotive; and braking the first locomotive when said locomotives are separated by a second, closer distance in response to a failure to initiate voice communication with said second locomotive.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
183 words
A method of locomotive collision avoidance between two locomotives and associated trains operating in railway system, comprising: periodically receiving on each locomotive digitally encoded data from a global positioning satellite system; creating a first data frame in each locomotive containing its identity, geographical location, speed and direction of travel; broadcasting from each locomotive digitally encoded signals containing its respective first data frame; receiving in each locomotive the first data frame from the other locomotive as a second data frame; processing said first and second data frames in a first locomotive to determine if a second locomotive is a collision candidate; initiating collision avoidance measure if the second locomotive is determining to be a collision candidate by: initiating both an audio and visual warning within the first locomotive when said locomotives are separated by less than a selected distance; permitting the audio alarm to be reset only after intiation of voice communication with the second locomotive; and braking the first locomotive when said locomotives are separated by a second, closer distance in response to a failure to initiate voice communication with said second locomotive.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method defined by claim 1 which further comprises the step of displaying in each locomotive the distance between said locomotives, as well as the identity, geographical location, speed and direction.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method defined by claim 1 wherein said collision avoidance measures further comprise the step of de-throttling the engine.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method defined by claim 1 wherein the identity of each locomotive is digitally encoded into a respective data frame with an onboard operator input device.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
198 words
A system of locomotive collision avoidance between two locomotives and associated trains operating in a railway system, comprising: means for periodically receiving on each locomotive digitally encoded data from a global positioning satellite system; means for creating a first data frame in each locomotive containing its identity, geographical location, speed and direction of travel; means for broadcasting from each locomotive digitally encoded signals containing its respective first data frame; means for receiving in each locomotive the first data frame from the other locomotive as a second data frame; means for processing said first and second data frames in a first locomotive to determine if a second locomotive is a collision candidate; means for initiating in said locomotives collision avoidance measures if the second locomotive is determine to be collision candidate by: initiating both an audio and visual warning within the first locomotive when said locomotives are separated by less than a selected distance; permitting the audio alarm to be rest only after initiation of voice communication with said second locomotive; and braking the first locomotive when said locomotive are separated by a second, closer distance in response to a failure to initiate voice communication with said second locomotive.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
198 words
A system of locomotive collision avoidance between two locomotives and associated trains operating in a railway system, comprising: means for periodically receiving on each locomotive digitally encoded data from a global positioning satellite system; means for creating a first data frame in each locomotive containing its identity, geographical location, speed and direction of travel; means for broadcasting from each locomotive digitally encoded signals containing its respective first data frame; means for receiving in each locomotive the first data frame from the other locomotive as a second data frame; means for processing said first and second data frames in a first locomotive to determine if a second locomotive is a collision candidate; means for initiating in said locomotives collision avoidance measures if the second locomotive is determine to be collision candidate by: initiating both an audio and visual warning within the first locomotive when said locomotives are separated by less than a selected distance; permitting the audio alarm to be rest only after initiation of voice communication with said second locomotive; and braking the first locomotive when said locomotive are separated by a second, closer distance in response to a failure to initiate voice communication with said second locomotive.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
30 words
The system defined by claim 5 which further comprises means for displaying in each locomotive the distance between said locomotives, as well as the identity, geographical location, speed and direction.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
18 words
The system defined by claim 5 wherein said collision avoidance measures further comprise means for de-throttling the engine.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
26 words
The system defined by claim 5 wherein the identity of each locomotive is digitally encoded into a respective data frame with an onboard operator input device.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2783369A
Cited
US2762913A
Cited
US3365572A
Cited
US4473787A
Cited
US4701760A
Cited
US5307074A
Cited
US4897661A
Cited
US5068654A
Cited
US4949089A
Cited
US5210534A
Cited
US5153836A
Cited
US5155490A
Cited
US5420792A
Cited
US5396426A
Cited
US5369591A
Cited
US5450329A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-11-12 | 2000-05-13 | 2000-11-12 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-11-12 | 2004-05-13 | 2004-11-12 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-11-12 | 2008-05-13 | 2008-11-12 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |