US5566167A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Subband echo canceler
Assignee: Nokia of America Corp
•
Filing: 1995-01-04
•
Granted: 1996-10-15
•
Expires: 2015-01-04
Abstract
Abstract Failure to cancel echos at frequencies in which the frequency characteristics of sub-band filters in the X and Y analysis filter banks overlag in subband echo cancelers is overcome by employing an X-analysis filter bank in which the pass-band of the subband filters is wider than the pass-band of the corresponding subband filters in the Y-analysis filter bank. This insures that there is sufficient energy in the tap delay lines of the adaptive filters in the subband echo cancelers at all frequencies where echos are to be synthesized. More specifically, the keeping of sufficient energy in the tap delay lines of the adaptive filters in the subband echo cancelers avoids exciting eigenmodes associated with the small eigenvalues of the correlation matrix.
Inventors
- 👤 Donald L. Duttweiler
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 18:52
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04B; H04B3/00; H04B3/02; H04B3/20; H04B3/21; H03; H03H; H03H21/00; H03H21/0012
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
173 words
A subband echo canceler comprising: a first analysis filter bank including a predetermined number of first filters for establishing a predetermined number of subbands and for decomposing a received signal into a corresponding number of subband signals, each of the first filters having a predetermined first frequency passband; a second analysis filter bank including a predetermined number of second filters equal to the predetermined number of the first filters for establishing a corresponding number of subbands and for decomposing a transmit signal into the predetermined number of subband signals, each of the second filters having a predetermined second frequency passband which is narrower than the first frequency passband; a plurality of echo cancelers supplied with the subband signals from the first analysis filter and the subband signals from the second analysis filter for canceling echoes in the corresponding subbands and for generating a predetermined number of error signals equal to the predetermined number of subbands; and a synthesis filter bank supplied with the predetermined number of error signals for synthesizing an output signal.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
173 words
A subband echo canceler comprising: a first analysis filter bank including a predetermined number of first filters for establishing a predetermined number of subbands and for decomposing a received signal into a corresponding number of subband signals, each of the first filters having a predetermined first frequency passband; a second analysis filter bank including a predetermined number of second filters equal to the predetermined number of the first filters for establishing a corresponding number of subbands and for decomposing a transmit signal into the predetermined number of subband signals, each of the second filters having a predetermined second frequency passband which is narrower than the first frequency passband; a plurality of echo cancelers supplied with the subband signals from the first analysis filter and the subband signals from the second analysis filter for canceling echoes in the corresponding subbands and for generating a predetermined number of error signals equal to the predetermined number of subbands; and a synthesis filter bank supplied with the predetermined number of error signals for synthesizing an output signal.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
60 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 1 wherein each of the first filters includes a first analysis prototype filter and first heterodyning apparatus for heterodyning down the frequency of the received signal and wherein each of the second filters includes a second analysis prototype filter and second heterodyning apparatus for heterodyning down the frequency of the transmit signal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
23 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 2 wherein the first and second analysis prototype filters are finite impulse response (FIR) filters.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
64 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 2 wherein the synthesis filter bank includes a predetermined number of third filters equal to the predetermined number of the first filters for establishing a corresponding number of subbands and for recomposing the error signals from the predetermined number of subbands into the output signal, each of the third filters having a predetermined third frequency passband.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
67 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 4 wherein each of the third filters includes a synthesis prototype filter which yields a filtered version of a corresponding error signal and third heterodyning apparatus for heterodyning up the frequency of the filtered version of the corresponding error signal and combining apparatus for combining the heterodyned up filtered versions of the error signals to yield the output signal.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
23 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 5 wherein each of the synthesis prototype filters is an finite impulse response (FIR) filter.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
48 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 1 wherein each of the first filters has a first frequency response band and each of the second filters has a second frequency response band and wherein said first and second frequency response bands substantially do not overlap each other.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
45 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 1 wherein each of the first filters has a first frequency response band and each of the second filters has a second frequency response band and wherein said first and second frequency response bands overlap each other.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
43 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 8 wherein the overlap of the first frequency response band and the second frequency response band substantially occurs between a roll-off frequency of the second filters and approximately a cut-off frequency of the first filters.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
94 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 9 wherein the frequency response of each of the second filters begins to roll-off approximately at frequency and cuts-off approximately at a frequency approximately two thirds of the way between the roll-off frequency of the second filters and cut-off frequency of the first filters and the frequency response of each of the first filters begins to roll-off at a frequency approximately one third of the way between roll-off frequency of the second filters and cut-off frequency of the first filters and cuts-off at approximately cut-off frequency.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
39 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 1 wherein each of the first filters and each of the second filters has a plurality of complex passband zeros arranged in complex conjugate pairs and a number of real zeros.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
17 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 11 wherein the number of real zeros is zero.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
17 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 11 wherein the number of real zeros is one.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
47 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 11 wherein each of the first filters has a predetermined number of bandpass zeros and each of the prototype filters has a predetermined number of complex passband zeros arranged in complex conjugate pairs, and a number of real zeros.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
32 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 14 wherein a predetermined number of the complex conjugate pairs of passband zeros is the same for the first filters and the second filters.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
64 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 14 wherein a predetermined number of the complex conjugate pairs of passband zeros is the same for the first filters and the second filters and wherein an outermost complex conjugate pair of the passband zeros in the first analysis prototype filters is different from an outermost complex conjugate pair of passband zeros of the second filters.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
41 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 14 wherein the predetermined number of the complex conjugate pairs of passband zeros in said first filters is greater than the predetermined number of complex conjugate pairs of zeros in the second filters.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
48 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 14 wherein the predetermined number of the complex conjugate pairs of passband zeros in said first filters is greater by one complex conjugate pair of zeros than the predetermined number of complex conjugate pairs of zeros in the second filters.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
60 words
The subband echo canceler as defined in claim 11 wherein each of the first filters includes a first analysis prototype filter and first heterodyning apparatus for heterodyning down the frequency of the received signal and wherein each of the second filters includes a second analysis prototype filter and second heterodyning apparatus for heterodyning down the frequency of the transmit signal.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-10-15 | 2000-04-15 | 2000-10-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-04-15 | 2004-10-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-10-15 | 2008-04-15 | 2008-10-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |