← Back to Patent Explorer
US5564412A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Magnetic resonance imaging method for localizing discrete details within a measured object

Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1994-04-15
•
Granted: 1996-10-15
•
Expires: 2014-04-15
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract In a medical resonance imaging method (NMR-tomography) the following program steps are executed in order to localize the position of a finite number e of discrete individual objects in a selected slice within a measuring object after recording of two slice selective projections in different directions: determining the position of the e individual objects based on the previously carried out recording steps; inquiring whether the localization of the e individual objects is unique; if yes, then ending the program execution; if no, then inquiring whether the number n of non-unique possibilities is smaller than a predetermined threshold value s; if yes, then carrying out a further program step with an encoding parameter which is changed with respect to all previously executed steps in accordance with a fixed predetermined scheme and subsequently returning to the first program step; if no, then calculating an encoding parameter which is suitable for resolving at least the majority of non-unique possibilities for the subsequent recording step, carrying out this recording step, and ending program execution.

Inventors

  • 👤 Jurgen Hennig

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-03 13:27
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R33/00; G01R33/20; G01R33/44; G01R33/48; G01R33/54; G01R33/56; G01R33/563; G01R33/4818; G01R33/4824; G01R33/5601; G01R33/5635

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim 239 words
A method of localizing the position of a finite number e of discrete individual objects in a slice through a measured object comprising the steps of: a1) selecting the slice with a slice selection gradient, a2) positioning the measured object in a homogeneous stationary magnetic field B 0 , a3) acquiring, in a first recording step, a first projection in a first projection direction perpendicular to a direction of the slice selection gradient in a plane of the slice, a4) acquiring, in a second recording step, a second projection in the plane of the slice in a second projection direction which differs from that of the first direction, a) determining the position of the e individual objects based on previous recording steps; b) examining if the localization of the e individual objects is unique after step a); b1) if yes, then ending execution; b2) if no, then proceeding to step c); c) determining if a number n of non-unique possibilities is smaller than a predetermined threshold value s; c1) if yes, executing a further recording step with an encoding parameter which is changed with respect to all previously executed recording steps in accordance with a fixed predetermined scheme and, subsequently, returning to step a); c2) if no, calculating an encoding parameter which is suitable for the resolution of at least a majority of non-unique possibilities for a subsequent recording step, carrying out this subsequent recording step, and ending execution.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 239 words
A method of localizing the position of a finite number e of discrete individual objects in a slice through a measured object comprising the steps of: a1) selecting the slice with a slice selection gradient, a2) positioning the measured object in a homogeneous stationary magnetic field B 0 , a3) acquiring, in a first recording step, a first projection in a first projection direction perpendicular to a direction of the slice selection gradient in a plane of the slice, a4) acquiring, in a second recording step, a second projection in the plane of the slice in a second projection direction which differs from that of the first direction, a) determining the position of the e individual objects based on previous recording steps; b) examining if the localization of the e individual objects is unique after step a); b1) if yes, then ending execution; b2) if no, then proceeding to step c); c) determining if a number n of non-unique possibilities is smaller than a predetermined threshold value s; c1) if yes, executing a further recording step with an encoding parameter which is changed with respect to all previously executed recording steps in accordance with a fixed predetermined scheme and, subsequently, returning to step a); c2) if no, calculating an encoding parameter which is suitable for the resolution of at least a majority of non-unique possibilities for a subsequent recording step, carrying out this subsequent recording step, and ending execution.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 196 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the first recording step comprises applying a slice selection gradient G s having a direction, exciting nuclear spins in the slice of the measured object through irradiation of a high frequency (HF) excitation pulse of small excitation band width, the slice being defined by a strength of the stationary magnetic field B 0 , a position dependent strength of the slice selection gradient G s and a frequency band given by an excitation band width of the excitation pulse, inverting the slice selection gradient G s to reverse a defocussing of the excited nuclear spins in different parts of the slice, applying a projection gradient G p in a first projection direction exhibiting an angle with respect to the direction of the slice selection gradient G s , inverting the projection gradient G p to produce a gradient echo, and recording the gradient echo, and, wherein in the second recording step, the method of the first recording step is repeated with an identical slice gradient, but with a second projection gradient direction which is likewise perpendicular to the slice selection gradient, but is different than the first projection gradient direction.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising a third recording step having a third projection in a third direction which is different than that of the first and the second projection directions, the third recording step being executed between the second recording step and step a).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 37 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising additional recording steps executed between the second recording step and step a), wherein the encoding parameter in at least one of step c1) and step c2) is a projection direction.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 4, wherein in each additional recording step each projection has a direction halfway between projection angle directions of preceding projections.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of claim 4, wherein a projection angle of each additional recording step is incremented by a fixed predetermined value with respect to a projection angle of a preceding recording step.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 6, wherein the steps a) to c2) comprise the recording of r projections at different predetermined projection angles, and r≈e<<256.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 35 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising recording and evaluating intensity information of each projection in all preceding recording steps to eliminate possible non-uniqueness in a determination of the positions of the e individual objects.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second recording steps each comprise a spin-echo sequence for signal excitation.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 72 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the application of time-of-flight angiography between two sequential recording steps, wherein for the investigation of discrete structures in a quasi-homogeneous object a separation process is undertaken in such a fashion that the sequential recording steps accentuate structures to be observed through the optimization of measurement parameters to recognize the structures with respect to a continuum of quasi-homogeneous remaining signals through the formation of threshold values.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 51 words
The method of claim 10, wherein the separation process comprises a formation of differences between two sequential recording steps to observe discrete structures having signals differing in both recording steps, a difference between the two sequential recording steps being effected by an application of a contrast medium between both recording steps.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 75 words
The method of claim 10, wherein the separation process comprises a formation of differences between two sequential recording steps to observe discrete structures having signal differing in both recording steps, a difference between the two sequential recording steps being effected through saturation of a fraction of the spins present in an entire volume by means of a saturation pulse sequence, wherein structures are detected which are engaged in an exchange of spins with saturated spins.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 68 words
The method of claim 10, wherein the separation process comprises a formation of differences between two sequential recording steps to observe discrete structures having signals differing in both recording steps, wherein the two sequential recording steps are taken under essentially constant measuring conditions and signal differences between both recording steps are determined to record those discrete structures subject to a signal variation which is independent of the experiment.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

DE2946820A1 Cited
US4607222A Cited
US5051698A Cited
DE3838792A1 Cited
US4984160A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1999-10-15 2000-04-15 2000-10-15 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2003-10-15 2004-04-15 2004-10-15 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2007-10-15 2008-04-15 2008-10-15 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag