← Back to Patent Explorer
US5537486A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

High-speed document verification system

Assignee: Open Text SA
•
Filing: 1990-11-13
•
Granted: 1996-07-16
•
Expires: 2010-11-13
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A high-speed document verification system includes a document which is printed with a pattern having a predetermined arrangement of different reflectivity due to varying densities, line resolutions, or fluorescence. The arrangement represents information about the document. The document is fed into a high-speed document scanner sensitive to the varying ink densities or line resolutions. A graphic image of the document is produced by the scanner and this image or a graphic file of the image is checked to see if the proper pattern exists. A comparison unit, such as an optical character recognition system may be used to compare the scanned document's image with known density arrangements of valid documents to determine what information, if any, is represented by the arrangement. The graphic image may be sent to an operator's work station to be visually checked rather than being compared by the comparison unit or the image may be sent to the operator after it has been rejected by the comparison unit.

Inventors

  • 👤 William N. Stratigos
  • 👤 Stephen R. Landau

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 07:24
CPC Classifications
G; G07; G07D; G07D7/00; G07D7/06; G07D7/12; B; B07; B07C; B07C5/00; B07C5/34; B07C5/342; B07C5/3422; G06; G06K; G06K19/00; G06K19/06; G06K19/08; G06K19/10; G06K19/14; G07D7/20

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 29
Claim 1
Independent Claim 176 words
A document verification system for use with a document having at least a portion thereof printed with a predetermined pattern of areas having differences that are not readily detected by the human eye but are readily detected by an optical scanner, wherein the differences represent information regarding validity of the document, comprising: means for scanning an entirety of a face of the document and for producing an electronic graphic image indicative of the entirety of the face of the document as scanned, said electronic graphic image containing said predetermined pattern such that said differences are apparent in said electronic graphic image; and means for detecting a presence and an absence of the differences contained in said electronic graphic image by comparing a density in one area of the graphic image to that in another area of the graphic image, the presence being an indication of the validity of the document, said detecting means including means for searching said electronic graphic image to locate the one area and the another area for purposes of effecting the comparing.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 176 words
A document verification system for use with a document having at least a portion thereof printed with a predetermined pattern of areas having differences that are not readily detected by the human eye but are readily detected by an optical scanner, wherein the differences represent information regarding validity of the document, comprising: means for scanning an entirety of a face of the document and for producing an electronic graphic image indicative of the entirety of the face of the document as scanned, said electronic graphic image containing said predetermined pattern such that said differences are apparent in said electronic graphic image; and means for detecting a presence and an absence of the differences contained in said electronic graphic image by comparing a density in one area of the graphic image to that in another area of the graphic image, the presence being an indication of the validity of the document, said detecting means including means for searching said electronic graphic image to locate the one area and the another area for purposes of effecting the comparing.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 16 words
The verification system of claim 1, wherein said comparing means includes an optical character recognition system.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 22 words
The verification system of claim 1, wherein the differences in the pattern are differences in the resolution of lines in the pattern.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 17 words
The verification system of claim 1, wherein the density varies due to ink having optically inert fillers.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 24 words
The verification system of claim 4, wherein the optically inert fillers are selected from the group consisting essentially of calcium carbonate and clay-based fillers.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 20 words
The verification system of claim 1, wherein the differences in the area are differences in the fluorescence of the pattern.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 27 words
The verification system of claim 1, wherein the comparing means includes a character recognition means for comparing a formulation in the graphic image to a predetermined character.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 195 words
A process useful in document verification, comprising the steps of: a. printing at least one valid document with at least a portion thereof having a pattern with a predetermined arrangement of areas having differences in density that are not readily detected by the human eye but are readily detected by an optical scanner, said arrangement representing information regarding validity of a document; b. scanning an entirety of a face of an unverified document in a high-speed document scanner to produce an electronic graphic image indicative of the entirety of the face of the unverified document as scanned; c. searching said electronic graphic image to find first and second portions of said electronic graphic image; and d. comparing the first and second portions of said electronic graphic image to said predetermined arrangement of differences to determine if the arrangement is present which would be an indication of the validity of the document, the comparing involving the steps of determining a density in the first portion of the graphic image, determining a density in the second portion of the graphic image, and comparing a ratio of density in the first and second portions to a predetermined value.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 195 words
A process useful in document verification, comprising the steps of: a. printing at least one valid document with at least a portion thereof having a pattern with a predetermined arrangement of areas having differences in density that are not readily detected by the human eye but are readily detected by an optical scanner, said arrangement representing information regarding validity of a document; b. scanning an entirety of a face of an unverified document in a high-speed document scanner to produce an electronic graphic image indicative of the entirety of the face of the unverified document as scanned; c. searching said electronic graphic image to find first and second portions of said electronic graphic image; and d. comparing the first and second portions of said electronic graphic image to said predetermined arrangement of differences to determine if the arrangement is present which would be an indication of the validity of the document, the comparing involving the steps of determining a density in the first portion of the graphic image, determining a density in the second portion of the graphic image, and comparing a ratio of density in the first and second portions to a predetermined value.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 18 words
The process of claim 8, wherein the differences include differences in resolution of the lines in the pattern.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 17 words
The process of claim 8, wherein the density differences are due to ink having optically inert fillers.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 23 words
The process of claim 10, wherein the optically inert fillers are selected from the group consisting essentially of calcium carbonate and clay-based fillers.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 12 words
The process of claim 8, wherein the differences include differences in fluorescence.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 23 words
The process of claim 8, wherein said step of printing comprises applying additional coats of print to the areas having a higher density.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 46 words
The process of claim 8, wherein said step of printing comprises applying print to paper in dot patterns, the areas including those of higher density which have more dots per unit area in the dot patterns than that for the areas which are of lower density.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 31 words
The process of claim 8, wherein the step of comparing is performed by a comparison unit programmed to detect the presence and absence of the predetermined arrangement in said graphic image.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 39 words
The process of claim 8, wherein the step of comparing involves the steps of selecting a part of the graphic image and utilizing an optical character recognition means to determine if a predetermined character is present in that part.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 157 words
A process for automatic verification of documents having a pattern with a predetermined arrangement of areas having differences in print density that are not readily detected by the human eye, but are readily detected by an optical scanner, the differences representing information regarding validity of a document, comprising the steps of: a. scanning an entirety of a face of an unverified document with an optical document scanner; b. producing an electronic graphic image indicative of the entirety of the face of the unverified document as scanned including print densities of said unverified document; c. searching said electronic graphic image to find first and second portions of said electronic graphic image; and d. comparing a print density in one portion of the graphic image to that in another portion of the graphic image and determining a presence and an absence of the differences based on the comparing which thereby signifies an indication of the validity of the document.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 157 words
A process for automatic verification of documents having a pattern with a predetermined arrangement of areas having differences in print density that are not readily detected by the human eye, but are readily detected by an optical scanner, the differences representing information regarding validity of a document, comprising the steps of: a. scanning an entirety of a face of an unverified document with an optical document scanner; b. producing an electronic graphic image indicative of the entirety of the face of the unverified document as scanned including print densities of said unverified document; c. searching said electronic graphic image to find first and second portions of said electronic graphic image; and d. comparing a print density in one portion of the graphic image to that in another portion of the graphic image and determining a presence and an absence of the differences based on the comparing which thereby signifies an indication of the validity of the document.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 34 words
The process of claim 17, wherein the step of comparing is performed by a comparison unit programmed to detect the presence and absence of the predetermined arrangement of areas having differences in graphic image.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 18 words
The process of claim 17, wherein the differences include differences in the resolution of lines in the pattern.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 16 words
The process of claim 17, wherein the density varies due to ink having optically inert fillers.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 21 words
The process of claim 20, wherein the optically inert fillers are selected from the group of calcium carbonate and clay-based fillers.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 12 words
The process of claim 17, wherein the differences are differences in fluorescence.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 38 words
The process of claim 17, wherein the comparing step involves the steps of selecting a part of the graphic image and utilizing an optical character recognition means to determine if a predetermined character is present in that part.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 56 words
The process of claim 17 further including the steps of: producing an invalid document indication where the electronic graphic image varies substantially from said predetermined arrangement of differences; and routing the electronic graphic image to an operator display terminal when such invalid document indicated is produced; and having the electronic graphic image inspected by an operator.
Claim 28
Independent Claim 153 words
A system useful in verification of documents having at least a portion thereof printed with a predetermined pattern of areas with differences that are not readily detected by the human eye, but are readily detected by an optical scanner, wherein the differences represent information regarding validity of the document, comprising: means for scanning an entirety of a face of a document and for producing an electronic image indicative of the entirety of the face of the document as scanned; and means for determining the validity of the scanned document with a comparison unit which detects a presence and an absence of the differences in the electronic image by comparing a density in one portion of the graphic image to that in another portion of the graphic image, said determining means including means for searching said electronic graphic image to locate the one portion and the another portion for purposes of effecting the comparing.
Claim 29
Independent Claim 153 words
A system useful in verification of documents having at least a portion thereof printed with a predetermined pattern of areas with differences that are not readily detected by the human eye, but are readily detected by an optical scanner, wherein the differences represent information regarding validity of the document, comprising: means for scanning an entirety of a face of a document and for producing an electronic image indicative of the entirety of the face of the document as scanned; and means for determining the validity of the scanned document with a comparison unit which detects a presence and an absence of the differences in the electronic image by comparing a density in one portion of the graphic image to that in another portion of the graphic image, said determining means including means for searching said electronic graphic image to locate the one portion and the another portion for purposes of effecting the comparing.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1999-07-16 2000-01-15 2000-07-16 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2003-07-16 2004-01-15 2004-07-16 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2007-07-16 2008-01-15 2008-07-16 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag