US5530651A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Running-safety system for an automotive vehicle
Assignee: Mazda Motor Corp
•
Filing: 1993-08-03
•
Granted: 1996-06-25
•
Expires: 2013-08-03
Abstract
Abstract The vehicle is provided with a radar unit for detecting an obstacle existing ahead in the course of the running way along which the vehicle is running. When the radar unit detects a variation in its detectable region, such as a detectable distance or a detectable area range in left and right directions, from the detectable region to be detectable during ordinary running, a safety unit such as an alarm unit or an automatic brake unit is operated. A control logic for operating a collision-avoiding system for avoiding a collision with the obstacle existing ahead, such as an alarm unit or an automatic brake unit, is altered to a safe side on which safety in driving the vehicle is improved, when the detectable region is varied.
Inventors
- 👤 Hiroki Uemura
- 👤 Tetsuro Butsuen
- 👤 Tohru Yoshioka
- 👤 Ayumu Doi
- 👤 Naotsugu Masuda
- 👤 Kenichi Okuda
- 👤 Tadayuki Niibe
- 👤 Yasunori Yamamoto
- 👤 Satoshi Morioka
- 👤 Tomohiko Adachi
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 06:39
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S15/00; G01S15/88; G01S15/93; G01S15/931; B; B60; B60T; B60T7/00; B60T7/12; B60T7/22; G01S13/00; G01S13/88; G01S13/93; G01S13/931; G01S15/86; G01S2013/93185; G01S2013/932; G01S2013/9322; G01S2013/9324; G01S2013/9325; G01S2013/9327; G01S2013/93271; G01S2013/9329; G01S7/00; G01S7/02; G01S7/40; G01S7/4004; G01S7/4039
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 57
Claim 1
Independent Claim
78 words
A running-safety system for an automotive vehicle, comprising: obstacle detecting means for detecting an obstacle in a detectable region existing ahead of the automotive vehicle in a running way along which the vehicle is running; detection means for detecting a variation from a normal state of the detectable region; and safety means for taking an action to make running of the vehicle safe when the detection means detects a variation of the detectable region from the normal state.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
78 words
A running-safety system for an automotive vehicle, comprising: obstacle detecting means for detecting an obstacle in a detectable region existing ahead of the automotive vehicle in a running way along which the vehicle is running; detection means for detecting a variation from a normal state of the detectable region; and safety means for taking an action to make running of the vehicle safe when the detection means detects a variation of the detectable region from the normal state.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
35 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, wherein: said detection means detects a decrease in the detectable region of the running way; and said safety means is operated when said detectable region is decreased.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
42 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 2, wherein said detection means detects an opacity of said obstacle detecting means to thereby detect a decrease in the detectable region of the running way when said obstacle detecting means is stained or soiled.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
32 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 2, wherein said detection means detects rain to thereby detect a decrease in the detectable region of the running way when the rain is detected.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
39 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 4, wherein a rate at which said safety means is altered to a safe side is set to become greater as a pressure of rain detected by said detection means becomes higher.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
32 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 2, wherein said detection means detects a blind curved corner existing ahead in the running way to thereby detect a decrease in the detectable region.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
46 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 2, wherein a rate at which said safety means is altered to a safe side becomes greater as a rate at which the detectable region of the running way to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means becomes greater.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
35 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, wherein: said detection means detects a decrease in the detectable distance of the running way; and said safety means is operated when said detectable distance is decreased.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
46 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, wherein: said detection means detects a decrease in the detectable region of the running way in left and right directions; and said safety means is operated when said detectable region in the left and right directions is decreased.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
27 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said safety means comprises an alarm unit disposed within a cabin of the vehicle for producing an alarm.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
23 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said safety means alters a running status of the vehicle to a safe side.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
15 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said safety means decelerates the vehicle.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
25 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 12, wherein said safety means comprises an automatic brake unit for automatically applying braking force to each wheel.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
44 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, wherein: said safety means comprises an alarm unit disposed within a cabin of the vehicle for producing an alarm and a running-status altering means for altering a running status of the vehicle to a safe side.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
46 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 14, wherein: said alarm unit comprises at least one of an alarm lamp and an alarm buzzer; and said running-status altering means comprises an automatic brake unit for automatically applying a braking force to each wheel of the vehicle.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
31 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said obstacle detecting means comprises at least a radar unit of an ultrasonic type or a radar unit of a laser type.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
136 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: decision means for making a decision in accordance with output from said obstacle detecting means to determine if there is a risk that the vehicle will collide with the obstacle existing ahead in the running way; and collision-avoiding means for avoiding a collision with the obstacle when it is decided by said decision means that there is the risk that the vehicle will collide with the obstacle; wherein said detection means detects a decrease in a detectable distance of the running way to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means; and wherein said safety means alters a decision logic for deciding the risk of collision of the vehicle with the obstacle to a safe side, when said detection means detects a decrease in said detectable distance.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
71 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 17, wherein: said decision means decides the risk of collision of the vehicle with the obstacle when a distance of the running way between the vehicle and the obstacle, obtained on the basis of output from said obstacle detecting means, becomes equal to or shorter than a predetermined distance; and said safety means alters said predetermined distance to become shorter than its original distance.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
156 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 18, wherein: said predetermined distance comprises a first predetermined distance and a second predetermined distance that is set to become shorter than said first predetermined distance; said collision-avoiding means comprises first collision-avoiding means set to correspond to said first predetermined distance and a second collision-avoiding means set to correspond to said second predetermined distance; said first collision-avoiding means is operated when it is decided by said decision means that a distance of the running way between the vehicle and the obstacle becomes equal to or shorter than said first predetermined distance; said second collision-avoiding means is operated when it is decided by said decision means that the distance of the running way between the vehicle and the obstacle becomes equal to or shorter than said second predetermined distance; and said safety means makes said first predetermined distance and said second predetermined distance shorter than each of their original distances.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
41 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 19, wherein: said first collision-avoiding means comprises an alarm unit for producing an alarm for an operator; and said second collision-avoiding means comprises an automatic brake unit for decelerating a speed of the vehicle.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
42 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 19, wherein said first predetermined distance and said second predetermined distance are each set to become shorter as the detectable distance of the running way to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means becomes shorter.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
152 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: decision means for making a decision that there is a risk that the vehicle will collide with the obstacle existing ahead in the running way, when a distance of the running way between the body of the vehicle and the obstacle, obtained on the basis of output from said obstacle detecting means, becomes equal to or shorter than a predetermined distance; and collision-avoiding means for avoiding a collision with the obstacle when it is decided by said decision means that there is the risk that the vehicle will collide with the obstacle; wherein said detection means detects a decrease in the detectable distance to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means; and wherein said safety means operates said collision-avoiding means prior to the decision made by said decision means when the decrease in the detectable distance is detected by said detection means.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
62 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 22, wherein: said collision-avoiding means contains an automatic brake unit for decelerating a speed of the vehicle; and said safety means operates said automatic brake unit during a period of time when a maximally detectable distance detectable by said obstacle detecting means becomes longer than said predetermined distance after the detectable distance has been reduced.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
28 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 23, further comprising an alarm unit for producing an alarm when said automatic brake unit is operated by said safety means.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
58 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 24, wherein: said collision-avoiding means has a first alarm unit for producing an alarm in addition to said automatic brake unit; and said alarm unit to be operated when said automatic brake unit is operated by said safety means comprises a second alarm unit disposed discretely from said first alarm unit.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
41 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 25, wherein: one of said first alarm unit and said second alarm unit is an alarm lamp; and the other of said first alarm unit and said second alarm unit is an alarm buzzer.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
150 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: decision means for deciding if a distance of the running way between the body of the vehicle and the obstacle, obtained on the basis of output from said obstacle detecting means, is shorter than a predetermined distance; and collision-avoiding means for avoiding a collision with the obstacle when it is decided by said decision means that the distance between the body of the vehicle and the obstacle, is shorter than said predetermined distance; wherein said detection means detects a decrease in the detectable distance of the running way to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means; and wherein said safety means comprises an automatic brake unit for decelerating a speed of the vehicle and operates said automatic brake unit when the decrease in the detectable distance to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means is detected by said detection means.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
60 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 27, wherein: said collision-avoiding means contains said automatic brake unit; and said automatic brake unit as said safety means is operated prior to the decision to be made by said decision means when the decrease in the detectable distance to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means is detected by said detection means.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
37 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 25, wherein said predetermined distance becomes longer as a relative speed of the vehicle relative to the obstacle in a direction in which the vehicle approaches the obstacle becomes faster.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
196 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 29, wherein: said predetermined distance is set as a first predetermined distance and a second predetermined distance, said second predetermined distance being set so as to become longer as the relative speed of the vehicle relative to the obstacle in a direction in which the vehicle approaches the obstacle becomes faster and to be shorter than said first predetermined distance; said collision-avoiding means contains an alarm unit in addition to said automatic brake unit, said alarm unit being operated when it is decided by said detection means that a distance of the running way between the vehicle and the obstacle is equal to or shorter than said first predetermined distance, and said automatic brake unit being operated when it is decided by said detection means that the distance between the vehicle and the obstacle is equal to or shorter than said second predetermined distance; and said safety means decelerates a speed of the vehicle by operating said automatic brake unit prior to the decision by said detection means when a decrease in the detectable distance to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means is detected by said detection means.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
72 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 30, wherein a period of time during which said automatic brake unit is operated by said safety means is set to be a period of time during which a maximally detectable distance to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means in a state in which the detectable distance to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means is decreased becomes longer than said first predetermined distance.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
32 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 31, wherein said first predetermined distance and said second predetermined distance are each set to become longer as the speed of the vehicle becomes faster.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
40 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said detection means detects an extension of the running way in left and right directions outside a detectable range of the running way to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
23 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 33, wherein said safety means comprises an alarm unit for producing an alarm for an operator.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
24 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 33, wherein said safety means comprises an automatic brake unit for decelerating the speed of the vehicle.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
36 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 33, wherein said detection means assumes the running way of the vehicle on the basis of a steered angle of a steering wheel and the speed of the vehicle.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
71 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 33, wherein said detection means detects a cornered road existing ahead in the course of the running way of the vehicle beyond a maximally detectable distance thereof to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means, to thereby determine that the running way of the vehicle extends in left and right directions outside a detectable region thereof to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
64 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 33, wherein said detection means detects cornering of the vehicle at a steep angle and further detects an extension of the running way of the vehicle in left and right directions outside the detectable region thereof to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means at the time of the cornering of the vehicle at the steep angle.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
128 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 33, wherein: said detection means detects an extension of the running way of the vehicle in the left and right directions outside the detectable region of the running way to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means when the maximally detectable distance to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means is shorter than a predetermined distance; and said predetermined distance is determined on the basis of an angle at which obstacle detecting means detects the obstacle existing ahead in left and right directions of the running way, a radius of curvature of the running way along which the vehicle is running, a laterally slipping angle of the body of the vehicle, and a direction in which a steering wheel is steered.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
48 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 39, wherein said radius of curvature of the running way and said laterally slipping angle of the body of the vehicle are determined each on the basis of the steered angle of the steering wheel and the speed of the vehicle.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
79 words
A running-safety system for an automotive vehicle, comprising: obstacle detecting means for detecting an obstacle existing ahead in a running way along which the vehicle is running; detection means for detecting a decrease in performance of detection of the obstacle by said obstacle detecting means; and safety means for taking an action to make running of the vehicle safe when said detection means detects the decrease in the performance of detection of the obstacle by said obstacle detecting means.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
79 words
A running-safety system for an automotive vehicle, comprising: obstacle detecting means for detecting an obstacle existing ahead in a running way along which the vehicle is running; detection means for detecting a decrease in performance of detection of the obstacle by said obstacle detecting means; and safety means for taking an action to make running of the vehicle safe when said detection means detects the decrease in the performance of detection of the obstacle by said obstacle detecting means.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
42 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 41, wherein said detection means detects an opacity of said obstacle detecting means to thereby detect a decrease in the detectable region of the running way when said obstacle detecting means is stained or soiled.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
32 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 41, wherein said detection means detects rain to thereby detect a decrease in the detectable region of the running way when the rain is detected.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
39 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 43, wherein a rate at which said safety means is altered to a safe side is set to become greater as a pressure of rain detected by said detection means becomes higher.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
32 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 41, wherein said detection means detects a blind curved corner existing ahead in the running way to thereby detect a decrease in the detectable region.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
46 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 41, wherein a rate at which said safety means is altered to a safe side becomes greater as a rate at which the detectable region of the running way to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means becomes greater.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
88 words
A running-safety system for an automotive vehicle, comprising: obstacle detecting means for detecting an obstacle in a detectable region existing ahead of the automotive vehicle in a running way along which the vehicle is running; direction detecting means for detecting a direction in which the vehicle is running; detection means for detecting a variation of the detectable region; and safety means for taking an action to make running of the vehicle safe when the detectable region does not lie in the direction in which the vehicle is running.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
88 words
A running-safety system for an automotive vehicle, comprising: obstacle detecting means for detecting an obstacle in a detectable region existing ahead of the automotive vehicle in a running way along which the vehicle is running; direction detecting means for detecting a direction in which the vehicle is running; detection means for detecting a variation of the detectable region; and safety means for taking an action to make running of the vehicle safe when the detectable region does not lie in the direction in which the vehicle is running.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
23 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 47, wherein said safety means comprises an alarm unit for producing an alarm for an operator.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
24 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 47, wherein said safety means comprises an automatic brake unit for decelerating the speed of the vehicle.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
36 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 47, wherein said detection means assumes the running way of the vehicle on the basis of a steered angle of a steering wheel and the speed of the vehicle.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim
71 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 47, wherein said detection means detects a cornered road existing ahead in the course of the running way of the vehicle beyond a maximally detectable distance thereof to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means, to thereby determine that the running way of the vehicle extends in left and right directions outside a detectable region thereof to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means.
Claim 55
Dependent Claim
64 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 47, wherein said detection means detects cornering of the vehicle at a steep angle and further detects an extension of the running way of the vehicle in left and right directions outside the detectable region thereof to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means at the time of the cornering of the vehicle at the steep angle.
Claim 56
Dependent Claim
128 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 47, wherein: said detection means detects an extension of the running way of the vehicle in the left and right directions outside the detectable region of the running way to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means when the maximally detectable distance to be detectable by said obstacle detecting means is shorter than a predetermined distance; and said predetermined distance is determined on the basis of an angle at which obstacle detecting means detects the obstacle existing ahead in left and right directions of the running way, a radius of curvature of the running way along which the vehicle is running, a laterally slipping angle of the body of the vehicle, and a direction in which a steering wheel is steered.
Claim 57
Dependent Claim
48 words
A running-safety system as claimed in claim 53, wherein said radius of curvature of the running way and said laterally slipping angle of the body of the vehicle are determined each on the basis of the steered angle of the steering wheel and the speed of the vehicle.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
JPS517892A
Cited
JPS5316230A
Cited
JPS5333444A
Cited
US4477184A
Cited
US4673937A
Cited
US4833469A
Cited
US4967860A
Cited
US4950075A
Cited
JPH027156A
Cited
US5251680A
Cited
US5285207A
Cited
US5314037A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-06-25 | 1999-12-25 | 2000-06-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-06-25 | 2003-12-25 | 2004-06-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-06-25 | 2007-12-25 | 2008-06-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |