US5524128A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Boiling water reactor stability control
Assignee: PECO Energy Co
•
Filing: 1993-11-17
•
Granted: 1996-06-04
•
Expires: 2013-11-17
Abstract
Abstract A control system for avoiding coupled neutronic-thermal hydraulic instabilities during maneuvering of a boiling water nuclear reactor that determines the average elevation in the reactor core of the coolant boiling boundary, and avoids instabilities by maintaining the core average coolant boiling boundary elevation above a target value, which is dependent on reactor design specifics but may be about four feet, in core power-flow operating regions which are subject to instabilities. The system may be implemented without physical modification of existing reactors or reactor instrumentation and control systems through use of the reactor core monitoring computer, which typically has available all core parameters necessary for the computations required in the invention. In a preferred embodiment, the control system is implemented by calculating the ratio of core power generated below the target elevation to the core power required for coolant saturation, and controlling the reactor so that the ratio is less than one.
Inventors
- 👤 Christofer N. Mowry
- 👤 Israel Nir
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 17:27
CPC Classifications
G; G21; G21D; G21D3/00; G21D3/08; Y; Y02; Y02E; Y02E30/00; Y02E30/30
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
186 words
A method of operational control of the stability of a boiling water nuclear reactor, said reactor having a core comprising vertically oriented fuel bundles in a generally right circular cylindrical array, each fuel bundle having an open lattice of nuclear fuel pins enclosed by a flow channel through which coolant water flows upwardly and is heated by thermal power generated by said fuel pins, said core having on a core average basis a boiling boundary between an upper coolant phase in which boiling occurs and a lower coolant phase in which boiling does not occur, said method comprising the steps of: a. establishing a target value of elevation in the reactor core of the average coolant boiling boundary; b. determining the actual elevation in the reactor core of the average coolant boiling boundary; c. comparing said actual coolant boiling boundary elevation to said target value; and d. controlling said actual coolant boiling boundary elevation to be greater than said target value, said controlling step being performed in a controlled region in core power-core flow space comprising a predetermined operating region of core power and core flow.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
186 words
A method of operational control of the stability of a boiling water nuclear reactor, said reactor having a core comprising vertically oriented fuel bundles in a generally right circular cylindrical array, each fuel bundle having an open lattice of nuclear fuel pins enclosed by a flow channel through which coolant water flows upwardly and is heated by thermal power generated by said fuel pins, said core having on a core average basis a boiling boundary between an upper coolant phase in which boiling occurs and a lower coolant phase in which boiling does not occur, said method comprising the steps of: a. establishing a target value of elevation in the reactor core of the average coolant boiling boundary; b. determining the actual elevation in the reactor core of the average coolant boiling boundary; c. comparing said actual coolant boiling boundary elevation to said target value; and d. controlling said actual coolant boiling boundary elevation to be greater than said target value, said controlling step being performed in a controlled region in core power-core flow space comprising a predetermined operating region of core power and core flow.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said controlling step is performed in a controlled region adjacent an instability region which comprises a predetermined operating region susceptible to power oscillations.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said reactor has a rated core flow and core power, and said controlling step is performed in a controlled region which lies between about 20% and about 60% of rated core flow, and between about 20% and 90% of rated core power.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of controlling said core power and core flow to be outside said instability region.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said establishing step includes establishing said target value at about one third of the height of said core.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said establishing step includes establishing said target value at about four feet.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said controlling step includes positioning of shaping control rods in said core.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 7, wherein said controlling step includes positioning of shaping control rods in said core so as to provide an average axial power distribution in said core which peaks at a relatively high core elevation.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing step includes comparing the power generated by said core in the axial region below said target value with the power required for coolant water saturation.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 9, wherein said comparing step includes determining the ratio of the power generated by said core in the axial region below said target value to the power required for coolant water saturation, and said controlling step includes controlling the operation of the reactor so that said ratio is equal to or less than one.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
117 words
Apparatus for use in controlling the operation of a boiling water nuclear reactor to avoid reactor core power oscillations, said reactor having a power generating core through which coolant water flows upwardly, said coolant having on a core average basis an average boiling boundary between an upper phase in which boiling occurs and a lower phase in which boiling does not occur, comprising: means for determining the average elevation in the core of the boiling boundary; means for comparing said average core boiling boundary elevation with a target value of core elevation; and means for controlling the operation of said reactor so as to maintain said average core boiling boundary elevation greater than said target elevation value.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
117 words
Apparatus for use in controlling the operation of a boiling water nuclear reactor to avoid reactor core power oscillations, said reactor having a power generating core through which coolant water flows upwardly, said coolant having on a core average basis an average boiling boundary between an upper phase in which boiling occurs and a lower phase in which boiling does not occur, comprising: means for determining the average elevation in the core of the boiling boundary; means for comparing said average core boiling boundary elevation with a target value of core elevation; and means for controlling the operation of said reactor so as to maintain said average core boiling boundary elevation greater than said target elevation value.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
14 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said target elevation value is about four feet.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
19 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said target elevation value is about one-third of the height of said core.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
30 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said means for determining said average core boiling boundary elevation includes means for determining the power generated by said core below said target elevation.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
34 words
The apparatus of claim 14, wherein said comparing means includes means for comparing the power generated by said core below said target elevation value with the power required for saturation of said coolant water.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
37 words
The apparatus of claim 15, wherein said comparing means includes means for determining the ratio of the power generated by said core below said target elevation value to the power required for saturation of said coolant water.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
28 words
The apparatus of claim 11, further including means coupled to said comparing means for displaying the comparison of said average boiling boundary elevation with said target elevation value.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
13 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said apparatus comprises a core monitoring computer.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3565760A
Cited
US3998693A
Cited
US4009614A
Cited
US4400343A
Cited
US4605530A
Cited
US4879087A
Cited
US5112570A
Cited
US4912732A
Cited
US5158738A
Cited
US4947485A
Cited
US5171516A
Cited
US5174946A
Cited
US5271044A
Cited
US5229068A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-06-04 | 1999-12-04 | 2000-06-04 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-06-04 | 2003-12-04 | 2004-06-04 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-06-04 | 2007-12-04 | 2008-06-04 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |