US5519225A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System and method for using a dual modality detector for inspecting objects
Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1994-10-03
•
Granted: 1996-05-21
•
Expires: 2014-10-03
Abstract
Abstract A system and method for using the detector to differentiate neutron attenuating material from high x-ray attenuating material in an object. The inspection system is used to detect the presence of nitride in titanium sponge nuggets or residual core material in a hollow-cast turbine engine blades. The inspection system uses a dual radiation source to alternately emit neutrons and x-rays or gamma rays at the object under inspection. A dual modality gas ionization detector detects the radiation passing through the object and sends the detected radiation to a processing means for image generation. The generated image is displayed on a display, enabling objects formed with low and high attenuating material to be distinguished.
Inventors
- 👤 Gregory A. Mohr
- 👤 Robert S. Gilmore
- 👤 Gerald B. Nightingale
- 👤 Thomas W. Birdwell
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 22:32
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N23/00; G01N23/02; G01N23/04; G01N23/05; G01T; G01T1/00; G01T1/16; G01T1/185; G01T3/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
154 words
A system for inspecting an object, the system comprising: a dual radiation source for alternately irradiating the object with neutrons and x-rays or gamma rays; a dual modality detector for measuring the alternating radiation passing through the object, the detector detecting small amounts of neutron attenuating material from large amounts of x-ray attenuation material; means for processing the detected radiation into an image differentiating the small amounts of neutron attenuating material from the large amounts of x-ray attenuation material, the processing means using a ratiometric procedure for detecting small neutron-attenuation inclusions in the object, the ratiometric procedure determining a ratiometric quantity R for various regions of the object, the ratiometric quantity R approximating the ratio: R=α.sub.x /α.sub.n, where α x is the linear attenuation coefficient of the object for x-rays and Δ n is the linear attenuation coefficient of the object for neutrons; and means for displaying the image generated from the processing means.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
154 words
A system for inspecting an object, the system comprising: a dual radiation source for alternately irradiating the object with neutrons and x-rays or gamma rays; a dual modality detector for measuring the alternating radiation passing through the object, the detector detecting small amounts of neutron attenuating material from large amounts of x-ray attenuation material; means for processing the detected radiation into an image differentiating the small amounts of neutron attenuating material from the large amounts of x-ray attenuation material, the processing means using a ratiometric procedure for detecting small neutron-attenuation inclusions in the object, the ratiometric procedure determining a ratiometric quantity R for various regions of the object, the ratiometric quantity R approximating the ratio: R=α.sub.x /α.sub.n, where α x is the linear attenuation coefficient of the object for x-rays and Δ n is the linear attenuation coefficient of the object for neutrons; and means for displaying the image generated from the processing means.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
The system according to claim 1, wherein the processing means maps neutron and photon transmissivities of radiation passing through the object along each path between the dual radiation source and the dual modality detector.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
40 words
The system according to claim 1, further comprising means for transporting the object relative to the dual modality detector, the object being in a direction perpendicular to both the detector and the radiation being emitted from the dual radiation source.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
40 words
The system according to claim 3, further comprising means for encoding positions of the dual radiation source, the dual modality detector, and the transporting means, the positional information being used to synchronize detected radiation signals from the dual modality detector.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
38 words
The system according to claim 1, wherein the image includes a plurality of pixel values each being proportional to an amount of material penetrated along an irradiation path between the dual radiation source and the dual modality detector.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
13 words
The system according to claim 1, wherein the image is generated in real-time.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
20 words
The system according to claim 1, further comprising means for removing the object if an impurity or defect is detected.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
138 words
A method for inspecting an object with a dual radiation source, a dual modality gas ionization detector, an image generator and a display, the method comprising the steps off alternately irradiating the object with neutrons and x-rays or gamma rays; detecting the alternating radiation passing through the object; processing the detected radiation into an image differentiating small amounts of neutron attenuating material from large amounts of x-ray attenuating material, the processing step includes using a ratiometric procedure for detecting small neutron-attenuation inclusions in the object, the ratiometric procedure determining a ratiometric quantity R for various regions of the object, the ratiometric quantity R approximating the ratio: R=α.sub.x /α.sub.n, where α x is the linear attenuation coefficient of the object for x-rays and Δ n is the linear attenuation coefficient of the object for neutrons; and displaying the image.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
138 words
A method for inspecting an object with a dual radiation source, a dual modality gas ionization detector, an image generator and a display, the method comprising the steps off alternately irradiating the object with neutrons and x-rays or gamma rays; detecting the alternating radiation passing through the object; processing the detected radiation into an image differentiating small amounts of neutron attenuating material from large amounts of x-ray attenuating material, the processing step includes using a ratiometric procedure for detecting small neutron-attenuation inclusions in the object, the ratiometric procedure determining a ratiometric quantity R for various regions of the object, the ratiometric quantity R approximating the ratio: R=α.sub.x /α.sub.n, where α x is the linear attenuation coefficient of the object for x-rays and Δ n is the linear attenuation coefficient of the object for neutrons; and displaying the image.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method according to claim 8, wherein the step of processing includes mapping neutron and photon transmissivities of radiation passing through the object along each path between the dual radiation source and the dual modality detector.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method according to claim 8, further comprising the step of transporting the object relative to the dual modality detector, the object being in a direction perpendicular to both the dual modality detector and the radiation being emitted from the dual radiation source.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method according to claim 8, wherein the image includes a plurality of pixel values each being proportional to an amount of material penetrated along an irradiation path between the dual radiation source and the dual modality detector.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method according to claim 8, wherein the object is a titanium sponge nugget.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method according to claim 8, further comprising the step of encoding positions of the dual radiation source and the dual modality detector, the positional information being used to synchronize detected radiation signals from the dual modality detector.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method according to claim 8, further comprising the step of removing the object if an impurity or defect is detected.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-05-21 | 1999-11-20 | 2000-05-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-05-21 | 2003-11-20 | 2004-05-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-05-21 | 2007-11-20 | 2008-05-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |