US5500940A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for evaluating failure in an electronic data storage system and preemptive notification thereof, and system with component failure evaluation
Assignee: Hewlett Packard Development Co LP
•
Filing: 1994-04-25
•
Granted: 1996-03-19
•
Expires: 2014-04-25
Abstract
Abstract A method for evaluating failure in an electronic data storage system that includes defining a data storage system in terms of its multiple storage components that are operably interconnected to store and retrieve electronic data. Failed storage components are detected and then evaluated to provide a degree of failure for that particular storage component. The data storage system is then analyzed at the system level for any diminished usability in view of the failed storage component and its degree of failure. This diminished usability can be translated into an effect on the data availability within the data storage system. The impact on data availability is reported to the user so that the user can make intelligent decisions which might preempt system-wide failure. A data storage system with failure evaluation is also described.
Inventors
- 👤 Tom A. Skeie
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 07:56
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/07; G06F11/0703; G06F11/0706; G06F11/0727; G06F11/22
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
186 words
A method for evaluating failure in an electronic data storage system, the method comprising the following steps: providing a data storage system having multiple storage components operably interconnected to store and retrieve electronic data, individual storage components being capable of failure where a failure of one storage component disrupts operation of the data storage system; detecting a failed storage component; evaluating the failed storage component to derive a degree of failure; assessing importance of the failed storage component to the operation of the data storage system based at least in part on the degree of failure of the failed storage component; and assigning a level of criticality to the failed storage component indicative of the disruption to operation of the data storage system caused by the failed storage component, the level of criticality being selected from a range of levels where higher levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component causes significant disruption to the operation of the data storage system and lower levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component does not cause significant disruption to the operation of the data storage system.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
186 words
A method for evaluating failure in an electronic data storage system, the method comprising the following steps: providing a data storage system having multiple storage components operably interconnected to store and retrieve electronic data, individual storage components being capable of failure where a failure of one storage component disrupts operation of the data storage system; detecting a failed storage component; evaluating the failed storage component to derive a degree of failure; assessing importance of the failed storage component to the operation of the data storage system based at least in part on the degree of failure of the failed storage component; and assigning a level of criticality to the failed storage component indicative of the disruption to operation of the data storage system caused by the failed storage component, the level of criticality being selected from a range of levels where higher levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component causes significant disruption to the operation of the data storage system and lower levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component does not cause significant disruption to the operation of the data storage system.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
18 words
A method according to claim 1 further comprising predicting risk of complete inoperability of the failed storage component.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
18 words
A method according to claim 1 further comprising predicting risk of complete inoperability of the data storage system.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method according to claim 1 further comprising reporting the level of criticality to a user.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method according to claim 1 further comprising reporting to a user an effect on data availability in the data storage system based upon the level of criticality assigned to the failed storage component.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
44 words
A method according to claim 1 further comprising: alerting a user that a storage component has failed; and reporting to a user an effect on data availability in the data storage system based upon the level of criticality assigned to the failed storage component.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
130 words
A method for evaluating failure in an electronic data storage system, the method comprising the following steps: providing a data storage system having multiple storage components operably interconnected to store and retrieve electronic data, individual storage components being capable of failure where a failure of one storage component diminishes usability of the data storage system to a different extent than a failure of another storage component; detecting a failed storage component; evaluating the failed storage component to provide a degree of failure of the failed storage component; determining diminishment of usability of the data storage system due to the failed storage component based upon the degree of failure; and deriving an effect on data availability in the data storage system based upon the diminished usability of the data storage system.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
130 words
A method for evaluating failure in an electronic data storage system, the method comprising the following steps: providing a data storage system having multiple storage components operably interconnected to store and retrieve electronic data, individual storage components being capable of failure where a failure of one storage component diminishes usability of the data storage system to a different extent than a failure of another storage component; detecting a failed storage component; evaluating the failed storage component to provide a degree of failure of the failed storage component; determining diminishment of usability of the data storage system due to the failed storage component based upon the degree of failure; and deriving an effect on data availability in the data storage system based upon the diminished usability of the data storage system.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method according to claim 7 further comprising predicting risk of complete reduction of usability of the data storage system.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 7 further comprising reporting to a user the effect on data availability in the data storage system resulting from the failed storage component.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
89 words
A method according to claim 7 further comprising: assigning a level of criticality to the failed storage component which correlates the degree of failure of the failed storage component to the diminished usability of the data storage system, the level of criticality being selected from a range of levels where higher levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component significantly diminishes usability of the data storage system and lower levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component does not significantly diminish usability of the data storage system.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
113 words
A method according to claim 7 further comprising: assigning a level of criticality to the failed storage component which correlates the degree of failure of the failed storage component to the diminished usability of the data storage system, the level of criticality being selected from a range of levels where higher levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component significantly diminishes usability of the data storage system and lower levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component does not significantly diminish usability of the data storage system; and deriving the effect on data availability in the data storage system based upon the level of criticality assigned to the failed storage component.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
159 words
A method for preempting failure in an electronic data storage system, the method comprising the following steps: establishing an electronic data storage system having multiple storage components operably interconnected to store and retrieve electronic data; defining failure characteristics of individual storage components in the data storage system; setting failure threshold values for individual storage components, each threshold value indicating a point at which a faulty storage component has experienced one or more events sufficient to degrade component quality that there is a selected statistical probability of failure; defining an impact on other storage components in the data storage system in the event that the threshold value of one storage component is exceeded; and notifying a user when the threshold value of a faulty storage component has been exceeded and alerting the user of the potential impact on the other storage components and effect on data availability in the data storage system as a result of the faulty storage component.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
159 words
A method for preempting failure in an electronic data storage system, the method comprising the following steps: establishing an electronic data storage system having multiple storage components operably interconnected to store and retrieve electronic data; defining failure characteristics of individual storage components in the data storage system; setting failure threshold values for individual storage components, each threshold value indicating a point at which a faulty storage component has experienced one or more events sufficient to degrade component quality that there is a selected statistical probability of failure; defining an impact on other storage components in the data storage system in the event that the threshold value of one storage component is exceeded; and notifying a user when the threshold value of a faulty storage component has been exceeded and alerting the user of the potential impact on the other storage components and effect on data availability in the data storage system as a result of the faulty storage component.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
90 words
A method according to claim 12 further comprising: prioritizing the storage components into priority levels where higher priority levels indicate that the associated storage component has greater impact on other storage components and on operation of the data storage system and lower priority levels indicate that the associated storage component has less impact on other storage components and on operation of the data storage system; first notifying the user of faulty storage components having higher priority levels; and subsequently notifying the user of faulty storage components having lower priority levels.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
155 words
An electronic data storage system for storing electronic data, the data storage system comprising: multiple storage components operably interconnected to store and retrieve electronic data; individual storage components being capable of failure where a failure of one storage component diminishes usability of the data storage system to a different extent than a failure of another storage component; failure evaluation means for detecting and evaluating a failed storage component to derive a degree of failure; and the failure evaluation means assigning a level of criticality which correlates the degree of failure of the failed storage component to the diminished usability of the data storage system, the level of criticality being selected from a range of levels where higher levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component significantly diminishes usability of the data storage system and lower levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component does not significantly diminish usability of the data storage system.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
155 words
An electronic data storage system for storing electronic data, the data storage system comprising: multiple storage components operably interconnected to store and retrieve electronic data; individual storage components being capable of failure where a failure of one storage component diminishes usability of the data storage system to a different extent than a failure of another storage component; failure evaluation means for detecting and evaluating a failed storage component to derive a degree of failure; and the failure evaluation means assigning a level of criticality which correlates the degree of failure of the failed storage component to the diminished usability of the data storage system, the level of criticality being selected from a range of levels where higher levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component significantly diminishes usability of the data storage system and lower levels of criticality represent that the failed storage component does not significantly diminish usability of the data storage system.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
35 words
An electronic data storage system according to claim 14 wherein the failure evaluation means derives an effect on data availability in the data storage system based upon the diminished usability of the data storage system.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
24 words
An electronic data storage system according to claim 14 wherein the failure evaluation means predicts risk of complete inoperability of the failed storage component.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
24 words
An electronic data storage system according to claim 14 wherein the failure evaluation means predicts risk of complete inoperability of the data storage system.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
42 words
An electronic data storage system according to claim 14 wherein the storage components are selected from a group comprising volatile memory, non-volatile memory, archival-type memory, a memory controller, a computer program, a power supply, a temperature controller, electronic interfacing, and a housing.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
35 words
An electronic data storage system according to claim 14 further comprising informative warning means for alerting a user that a storage component has failed and reporting the level of criticality to the failed storage component.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
41 words
An electronic data storage system according to claim 14 further comprising informative warning means for reporting to a user an effect on data availability in the data storage system based upon the level of criticality assigned to the failed storage component.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4727545A
Cited
US5101408A
Cited
US5127005A
Cited
US5210704A
Cited
US5315972A
Cited
US5265035A
Cited
US5367669A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-03-19 | 1999-09-18 | 2000-03-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-03-19 | 2003-09-18 | 2004-03-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-03-19 | 2007-09-18 | 2008-03-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |