Optical isolator and polarization splitter therefor

Claim 2

An optical isolator having no dependence on direction of plane of polarization, which comprises: a pair of parallel linear optical waveguides having first, second and third grooves formed in order along the waveguides; a first birefringent crystal plate inserted in the first groove; a half wave plate and a Faraday rotator inserted in the second groove; a second birefringent crystal plate inserted in the third groove; and said first and second birefringent crystal plates, said half wave plate and said Faraday rotator being arranged so that an incident light in a forward direction into one of the waveguides exits from the other of the optical waveguides, and an incident light in a reverse direction into the other optical waveguide does not return to said one of the waveguides.

Claim 3

An optical isolator according to claim 1, wherein said first and second birefringent crystal plates, said half wave plate and said Faraday rotator are obliquely arranged with respect to said optical waveguides, so that an extraordinary light in the incident light in the forward direction entering said one of the optical waveguides passes straight through the first birefringent crystal plate and an ordinary light in the incident light in said one of the optical waveguides is deviated through the first birefringent crystal plate into the other optical waveguide, planes of polarization of said extraordinary and ordinary lights being rotated by 90 degrees when they pass through said half wave plate and said Faraday rotator, and an extraordinary light now converted from said ordinary light passing straight through the second birefringent plate and an ordinary light now converted from said extraordinary light being deviated into the other optical waveguide, and whereby an extraordinary light in an incident light in the reverse direction entering the other optical waveguide passes straight back through the second birefringent crystal plate and an ordinary light in the incident light in the reverse direction into the other optical waveguide is deviated through the second birefringent crystal plate into said one of the optical waveguides, polarized lanes of said extraordinary and ordinary lights not being rotated when they pass through said half wave plate and said Faraday rotator, said extraordinary light passing straight through the first birefringent crystal plate into the other optical waveguide and said ordinary light being deviated from said one of the optical waveguides.

Claim 4

An optical isolator according to claim 2, wherein a plane formed by said two optical waveguides is parallel to a vector normal to the incident surface of each of said birefringent crystal plates and the optical axes of said birefringent crystal plates are also parallel to said plane, and the following relationship is substantially satisfied: tan θ.sub.in =A/[√B(n.sub.in -√B)] where A=(n O 2 -n E 2 ) cos θ C sin θ C B=n E 2 sin 2 θ C +n O 2 cos θ C n in : Refractive index of the optical waveguides n O : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plates for ordinary light n E : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plates for extraordinary light θ in : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the vector normal to the incident surface of each of the birefringent crystal plates θ C : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the optical axis of each of the birefringent crystal plates (side opposite to θ in is deemed positive).

Claim 5

An optical isolator according to claim 3, wherein the spacing d between the two parallel waveguides substantially satisfies the following relationship: d=sin (θ.sub.in -θ.sub.O)t/cos θ.sub.O where θ O =sin -1 [(n in /n O ) sin θ in ] t=Thickness of the birefringent crystal plates.

Claim 6

An optical isolator according to claim 1, wherein the optical waveguides are composed of optical fibers.

Claim 7

An optical isolator having no dependence on a plane of polarization, which comprises in the following sequence beginning from an input side to an output side: one or more parallel linear input optical waveguides; a first birefringent crystal plate arranged obliquely with respect to the linear optical waveguides; parallel intermediate optical waveguides one more greater in number than the at least one input optical waveguide and in alignment with said at least one input optical waveguide; a half wave plate and a Faraday rotator inserted in an oblique groove formed in said intermediate optical waveguides; a second birefringent crystal plate arranged obliquely with respect to the intermediate optical waveguides; and one or more parallel output waveguides in alignment with said intermediate optical waveguides; wherein a plane formed by said optical waveguides is parallel to a vector normal to the incident surface of each of said birefringent crystal plates, the optical axes of said birefringent crystal plates are also parallel to said plane, and the following relationship is substantially satisfied: tan θ.sub.in =A/[√B(n.sub.in -√B)] where A=(n o 2 -n E 2 ) cos θ c sin θ c B= E 2 sin 2 θ c +n O 2 cos θ c n in : Refractive index of the optical waveguides n o : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plates for ordinary light n E : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plates for extraordinary light θ in : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the vector normal to the incident surface of each of the birefringent crystal plates θ c : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the optical axis of each of the birefringent crystal plates (side opposite to θ in is deemed positive).

Claim 8

An optical isolator having no dependence on a plane of polarization, which comprises in the following sequence beginning from an input side to an output side: one or more parallel linear input optical waveguides; a first birefringent crystal plate arranged obliquely with respect to the linear optical waveguides; parallel intermediate optical waveguides one more greater in number than the at least one input optical waveguide and in alignment with said at least one input optical waveguide; a half wave plate and a Faraday rotator inserted in an oblique groove formed in said intermediate optical waveguides; a second birefringent crystal plate arranged obliquely with respect to the intermediate optical waveguides; and one or more parallel output waveguides in alignment with said intermediate optical waveguides; wherein a plane formed by said optical waveguides is parallel to a vector normal to the incident surface of each of said birefringent crystal plates, the optical axes of said birefringent crystal plates are also parallel to said plane, and the following relationship is substantially satisfied: tan θ.sub.in =A/[√B(n.sub.in -√B)] where A=(n o 2 -n E 2 ) cos θ c sin θ c B= E 2 sin 2 θ c +n O 2 cos θ c n in : Refractive index of the optical waveguides n o : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plates for ordinary light n E : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plates for extraordinary light θ in : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the vector normal to the incident surface of each of the birefringent crystal plates θ c : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the optical axis of each of the birefringent crystal plates (side opposite to θ in is deemed positive).

Claim 9

An optical isolator according to claim 6 wherein the spacing d between each adjacent pair of said parallel optical waveguides substantially satisfies the following relationship: d=sin (θ.sub.in -θ.sub.O)t/cos θ.sub.O where θ O=sin -1 [(n in /n O ) sin θ in ] t=Thickness of the birefringent crystal plates.

Claim 10

A polarization splitter comprising at least two parallel optical waveguides, and a birefringent crystal plate inserted in a groove formed obliquely in said optical waveguides, wherein a plane formed by said two optical waveguides is parallel to a vector normal to the incident surface of said birefringent crystal plate, the optical axis of said birefringent crystal plate is also parallel to said plane, and the following relationship is substantially satisfied: tan θ.sub.in =A/[√B(n.sub.in -√B)] where A=(n O 2 -n E 2 ) cos θ C sin θ C B=n E 2 sin 2 θ C +n o 2 cos θ C n in : Refractive index of the optical waveguides n o : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plate for ordinary light n E : Refractive index of the birefringent plate for extraordinary light θ in : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the vector normal to the incident surface of each of the birefringent crystal plates θ c : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the optical axis of the birefringent crystal plate (side opposite to θ in is deemed positive).

Claim 11

A polarization splitter comprising at least two parallel optical waveguides, and a birefringent crystal plate inserted in a groove formed obliquely in said optical waveguides, wherein a plane formed by said two optical waveguides is parallel to a vector normal to the incident surface of said birefringent crystal plate, the optical axis of said birefringent crystal plate is also parallel to said plane, and the following relationship is substantially satisfied: tan θ.sub.in =A/[√B(n.sub.in -√B)] where A=(n O 2 -n E 2 ) cos θ C sin θ C B=n E 2 sin 2 θ C +n o 2 cos θ C n in : Refractive index of the optical waveguides n o : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plate for ordinary light n E : Refractive index of the birefringent plate for extraordinary light θ in : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the vector normal to the incident surface of each of the birefringent crystal plates θ c : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the optical axis of the birefringent crystal plate (side opposite to θ in is deemed positive).

Claim 12

A polarization splitter according to claim 8, wherein the spacing d between adjacent two of the parallel optical waveguides substantially satisfies the following relationship: d=sin (θ.sub.in -θ.sub.O)t/cos θ.sub.O where θ O =sin -1 [(n in /n O ) sin θ in ] t=Thickness of the birefringent crystal plate.

Claim 13

A polarization splitter according to claim 8 wherein the optical waveguides are composed of optical fibers.

Claim 14

A polarization splitter comprising one or more input optical waveguides on an incident side and parallel output optical waveguides on an exit side larger in number than said input optical waveguides and in alignment with said input optical waveguides, and a birefringent crystal plate inserted obliquely between said input and output optical waveguides, wherein a plane formed by said optical waveguides is parallel to a vector normal to the incident surface of said birefringent crystal plate, the optical axis of said birefringent crystal plate is also parallel to said plane, and the following relationship is substantially satisfied: tan θ.sub.in =A/[√B(n.sub.in -√B)] where A=(n O 2 -n E 2 ) cos θ C sin θ C B=n E 2 sin 2 θ C +n O 2 cos θ C n in : Refractive index of the optical waveguides n O : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plate for ordinary light n E : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plate for extraordinary light θ in : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the vector normal to the incident surface of the birefringent crystal plates θ C : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the optical axis of the birefringent crystal plate (side opposite to θ in is deemed positive).

Claim 15

A polarization splitter comprising one or more input optical waveguides on an incident side and parallel output optical waveguides on an exit side larger in number than said input optical waveguides and in alignment with said input optical waveguides, and a birefringent crystal plate inserted obliquely between said input and output optical waveguides, wherein a plane formed by said optical waveguides is parallel to a vector normal to the incident surface of said birefringent crystal plate, the optical axis of said birefringent crystal plate is also parallel to said plane, and the following relationship is substantially satisfied: tan θ.sub.in =A/[√B(n.sub.in -√B)] where A=(n O 2 -n E 2 ) cos θ C sin θ C B=n E 2 sin 2 θ C +n O 2 cos θ C n in : Refractive index of the optical waveguides n O : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plate for ordinary light n E : Refractive index of the birefringent crystal plate for extraordinary light θ in : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the vector normal to the incident surface of the birefringent crystal plates θ C : Angle between axes of the optical waveguides and the optical axis of the birefringent crystal plate (side opposite to θ in is deemed positive).

Claim 16

A polarization splitter according to claim 11 wherein the spacing d between adjacent pair of the parallel optical waveguides substantially satisfies the following relationship: d=sin (θ.sub.in -θ.sub.O)t/cosθ.sub.O where θ O sin -1 [n in /n O ) sin θ in ] t=Thickness of the birefringent crystal plate.