Patent US2083920A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5447166A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Neurocognitive adaptive computer interface method and system based on on-line measurement of the user's mental effort
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1994-01-19
•
Granted: 1995-09-05
•
Expires: 2014-01-19
Abstract
Abstract A human-computer interface uses neuroelectric signals recorded from the user's scalp i.e. electroencephalograms (EEGs) to alter the program being run by the computer, for example to present less or more difficult material to the user, depending on the user's neurocognitive on-line workload score. Each user is tested with a standard battery of tasks, while wearing an EEG hat, to calibrate a neurocognitive workload function. The calibrated function is user-specific and is obtained by modifying a neural network pattern analyzer which has been previously trained to index neurocognitive workload using data from a group of subjects performing the same battery of tasks.
Inventors
- 👤 Alan S. Gevins
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 11:17
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/72; A61B5/7235; A61B5/7264; A61B5/16; A61B5/24; A61B5/316; A61B5/369; A61B5/377; A61B5/7203; A61B5/7207; A61B5/7267; G; G16; G16H; G16H50/00; G16H50/20; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S128/00; Y10S128/92; Y10S128/925
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 32
Claim 1
Independent Claim
205 words
A method in human-computer interface for the computer to automatically react to the user's neurocognitive workload without the user exerting muscle command action, by the computer changing a portion of a program being run by a computer; including the steps of: (a) presenting the user with a battery of standard tasks and, while the user performs the tasks, detecting and analyzing the brain waves of the user with an EEG (electroencephalograph) device having a plurality of electrodes removably connected to the scalp of the user to determine a normative neurocognitive workload calibration function for the user while the user performs the tasks, and recording the normative neurocognitive calibration function in the computer system memory; (b) the user operates the computer system using the computer system muscle operated input control means; (c) simultaneously with (b) detecting and analyzing the brain waves of the user with an EEG (electroencephalograph) device having a plurality of electrodes removably connected to the scalp of the user, to determine on-line neurocognitive workload score from the user's normative neurocognitive calibration function; and (d) adjusting a portion of the program being run by the computer system if the user's on-line neurocognitive workload score is a predetermined amount below or above a threshold value.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
205 words
A method in human-computer interface for the computer to automatically react to the user's neurocognitive workload without the user exerting muscle command action, by the computer changing a portion of a program being run by a computer; including the steps of: (a) presenting the user with a battery of standard tasks and, while the user performs the tasks, detecting and analyzing the brain waves of the user with an EEG (electroencephalograph) device having a plurality of electrodes removably connected to the scalp of the user to determine a normative neurocognitive workload calibration function for the user while the user performs the tasks, and recording the normative neurocognitive calibration function in the computer system memory; (b) the user operates the computer system using the computer system muscle operated input control means; (c) simultaneously with (b) detecting and analyzing the brain waves of the user with an EEG (electroencephalograph) device having a plurality of electrodes removably connected to the scalp of the user, to determine on-line neurocognitive workload score from the user's normative neurocognitive calibration function; and (d) adjusting a portion of the program being run by the computer system if the user's on-line neurocognitive workload score is a predetermined amount below or above a threshold value.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method as in claim 1 and simultaneouly with (a) and (c) detecting and measuring other physiological signals of the user selected from the group of facial muscle, eye muscle, heart activity and respiration.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein the workload calibration function of (a) includes the overall normative neurocognitive workload function and the workload score of (c) includes the overall on-line neurocognitive workload score.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
43 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein the neurocognitive workload function of (a) includes neurocognitive workload functions for each of a plurality of specialized brain systems and the neurocognitive workload score of (c) includes a score for each of the specialized brain systems.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein in (a) the workload calibration function is determined using a neural network pattern analyzer in which generic networks are created derived from a normal population performing the standard tasks.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method as in claim 5 wherein a specific calibration function is obtained for each user in (a) by transforming each user's brain wave data to Z-score variables and inputting the Z-score variables into the neural network pattern analyzer.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein the user in steps (a) and (c) wears a hat having a plurality of electrodes to contact the scalp of the user.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein the computer is a portion of a computer-aided instruction system.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method as in claim 8 wherein the portion of the program is adjusted to a less difficult instruction level if the user's neurocognitive workload score is above a threshold value.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method as in claim 8 wherein the portion of the program is adjusted to a more difficult level if the user's neurocognitive workload score is below a threshold value.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
152 words
A method as in claim 8 wherein the portion of the program being run is changed depending on the user's use of specialized brain systems involved with perception, action, and cognition which include: the planum temporale, superior temporal gyrus, Heschl's gyrus and associated structures involved with auditory processing and speech perception; the occipital and inferotemporal cortices and the parieto-occipito-temporal junction and associated structures involved in visual processing and pattern recognition; the precentral gyrus, lateral premotor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, and associated structures involved with the planning, initiation, and execution of motor movements; the dominant hemisphere frontal operculum, dorsalateral frontal cortex, and planum temporale and supramarginal gyrus and associated structures involved with language functions; and the networks of structures encompassing the prefrontal, parietal, and temporal association cortices and associated regions involved in processing spatial information, in preparation and sequential planning, in reasoning, in focusing and shifting attention, in learning, and in working memory.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method as in claim 1 wherein the computer is part of a computer based controlled system.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
48 words
A method as in claim 12 and including the step of the computer based controlled system reacting to the user's neurocognitive workload score being above a threshold by a predetermined amount, the computer adjusting a portion of the program so that the user is presented with less-demanding tasks.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
49 words
A method as in claim 12 and including the step of the computer based controlled system reacting to the user's neurocognitive workload score being below the threshold by a predetermined amount by the computer adjusting a portion of the program so that the user is presented with more-demanding tasks.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
152 words
A method as in claim 12 and including the step of the computer based controlled system reacting to the user's use of regional brain systems involved with perception, action, and cognition which include: the planum temporale, superior temporal gyrus, Heschl's gyrus and associated structures involved with auditory processing and speech perception; the occipital and inferotemporal cortices and the parieto-occipito-temporal junction and associated structures involved in visual processing and pattern recognition; the precentral gyrus, lateral premotor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, and associated structures involved with the planning, initiation, and execution of motor movements; the dominant hemisphere frontal operculum, dorsalateral frontal cortex, and planum temporale and supramarginal gyrus and associated structures involved with language functions; and the networks of structures encompassing the prefrontal, parietal, and temporal association cortices and associated regions involved in processing spatial information, in preparation and sequential planning, in reasoning, in focusing and shifting attention, in learning, and in working memory.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
198 words
A system in human-computer interface including a computer which runs a plurality of programs and which automatically reacts to the user's neurocognitive workload without the user exerting muscle command action by the computer changing a portion of the program being run by a computer, including: (a) means for presenting the user with a battery of standard tasks; means for detecting and analyzing the brain waves of the user comprising an EEG (electroencephalograph) device having a plurality of electrodes adapted to be removably connected to the scalp of the user to determine a normative neurocognitive workload calibration function for the user while the user performs the tasks and means for recording the normative neurocognitive calibration function comprising a portion of computer memory; (b) muscle operated input control means to operate the computer; (c) means for simultaneously with the operation of (b) to detect and analyze the brain waves of the user comprising said EEG device to determine on-line neurocognitive workload scores from the user's normative neurocognitive calibration function; and (d) means to adjust a portion of the program being run by the computer if the user's on-line neurocognitive workload score is a predetermined amount below or above a threshold.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
198 words
A system in human-computer interface including a computer which runs a plurality of programs and which automatically reacts to the user's neurocognitive workload without the user exerting muscle command action by the computer changing a portion of the program being run by a computer, including: (a) means for presenting the user with a battery of standard tasks; means for detecting and analyzing the brain waves of the user comprising an EEG (electroencephalograph) device having a plurality of electrodes adapted to be removably connected to the scalp of the user to determine a normative neurocognitive workload calibration function for the user while the user performs the tasks and means for recording the normative neurocognitive calibration function comprising a portion of computer memory; (b) muscle operated input control means to operate the computer; (c) means for simultaneously with the operation of (b) to detect and analyze the brain waves of the user comprising said EEG device to determine on-line neurocognitive workload scores from the user's normative neurocognitive calibration function; and (d) means to adjust a portion of the program being run by the computer if the user's on-line neurocognitive workload score is a predetermined amount below or above a threshold.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
36 words
A system as in claim 16 and means for simultaneouly with (a) and (c) detecting and measuring other physiological signals of the user selected from the group of facial muscle, eye muscle, heart activity and respiration.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
33 words
A system as in claim 16 wherein the workload calibration function of (a) includes the overall normative neurocognitive workload function and the workload score of (c) includes the overall on-line neurocognitive workload score.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
43 words
A system as in claim 16 wherein the neurocognitive workload function of (a) includes neurocognitive workload functions for each of a plurality of specialized brain systems and the neurocognitive workload score of (c) includes a score for each of the specialized brain systems.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
28 words
A system as in claim 16 and including a neural network pattern analyzer in which generic networks are created derived from a normal population performing the standard tasks.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
40 words
A system as in claim 20 and including means for obtaining a specific calibration for each user in (a) by transforming each user's brain wave data to Z-score variables and inputting the Z-score variables into the neural network pattern analyzer.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
22 words
A system as in claim 16 and including a hat having a plurality of electrodes to contact the scalp of the user.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
17 words
A system as in claim 16 wherein the computer is a portion of a computer-aided instruction system.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
30 words
A system as in claim 23 wherein the portion of the program is adjusted to a less difficult instruction level if the user's neurocognitive workload score is above a threshold.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
29 words
A system as in claim 23 wherein the portion of the program is adjusted to a more difficult level of the user's neurocognitive workload score is below a threshold.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
152 words
A system as in claim 23 wherein the portion of the program being run is changed depending on the user's use of regional brain systems involved with perception, action, and cognition which include: the planum temporale, superior temporal gyrus, Heschl's gyrus and associated structures involved with auditory processing and speech perception; the occipital and inferotemporal cortices and the parieto-occipito-temporal junction and associated structures involved in visual processing and pattern recognition; the precentral gyrus, lateral premotor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, and associated structures involved with the planning, initiation, and execution of motor movements; the dominant hemisphere frontal operculum, dorsalateral frontal cortex, and planum temporale and supramarginal gyrus and associated structures involved with language functions; and the networks of structures encompassing the prefrontal, parietal, and temporal association cortices and associated regions involved in processing spatial information, in preparation and sequential planning, in reasoning, in focusing and shifting attention, in learning, and in working memory.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
17 words
A system as in claim 16 wherein the computer is part of a computer based controlled system.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
44 words
A system as in claim 27 and including means for the computer-based controlled system to react to the user's neurocognitive workload score being above a threshold by the computer adjusting a portion of the program so that the user is presented with less-demanding tasks.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
45 words
A system as in claim 27 and including means for the computer based controlled system to react to the user's neurocognitive workload score being below a threshold by the computer adjusting a portion of the program so that the user is presented with more-demanding tasks.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
152 words
A system as in claim 27 and including means for the computer based controlled system to react to the user's use of regional brain systems involved with perception, action, and cognition which include: the planum temporale, superior temporal gyrus, Heschl's gyrus and associated structures involved with auditory processing and speech perception; the occipital and inferotemporal cortices and the parieto-occipito-temporal junction and associated structures involved in visual processing and pattern recognition; the precentral gyrus, lateral premotor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, and associated structures involved with the planning, initiation, and execution of motor movements; the dominant hemisphere frontal operculum, dorsalateral frontal cortex, and planum temporale and supramarginal gyrus and associated structures involved with language functions; and the networks of structures encompassing the prefrontal, parietal, and temporal association cortices and associated regions involved in processing spatial information, in preparation and sequential planning, in reasoning, in focusing and shifting attention, in learning, and in working memory.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-09-04 | 1999-03-06 | 1999-09-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-09-04 | 2003-03-06 | 2003-09-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-09-04 | 2007-03-06 | 2007-09-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |